Low Voltage-Directed Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
NCT ID: NCT03355456
Last Updated: 2024-06-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
250 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-07-14
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. specified low voltage-directed with pulmonary vein isolation (LD+PVI) approach compared to ,
2. an approach of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Study of the CardioFocus Endoscopic Ablation System - Adaptive Contact (EAS-AC) for the Treatment of Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation
NCT00971204
Catheter Ablation for Recently Diagnosed Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
NCT01505296
HeartLight Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF)
NCT01456000
Single Center Pilot Study Using the ECGenius System to Collect Electrogram Data to Test an Ablation Impact Algorithm
NCT05458648
Bipolar Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) Study
NCT02374476
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* PVI with additional total left atrial low voltage-directed ablation.
* PVI alone.
All patients will receive the best conventional medical therapy and anticoagulation use based upon HRS consensus recommendations taking into account their baseline risk factors for stroke. The need for interruption of anticoagulation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy for the procedure will be determined by the operator and their center guidelines.
The trial requires continuous monitoring for atrial arrhythmias. Investigators will recommend the use of implantable loop recorders (ILR) but continuous 30 day monitoring with auto-trigger function may be substituted at the 6, 9 and 12 month time points. The ILR device will be implanted under sterile conditions at the manufacture's recommended site on the precordium for arrhythmia monitoring. Implantation will occur between 1 month prior and 3 months post ablation since there will be a 3 month post ablation blanking period. If a dual chamber device is already present, implantation will not be required. iWatch, Kardia or other non-FDA approved cardiac monitoring can be used to preliminarily identify AF recurrence but AF recurrence must be separately verifiable by ECG or other FDA-certified monitoring system.
One year follow-up is planned. Post procedure care is per standard of care with follow-up at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months. ECG at every follow-up is performed. Download of arrhythmia data will occur at each of these visits as well. Investigators will use the typical post ablation blanking period for recurrence of atrial fibrillation of 3 months. Antiarrhythmic medications can be used during the typical "blanking period" of 3 months post procedure. But per protocol are stopped at 3 months post procedure (2 months post procedure in case of amiodarone).
Investigators will compare time freedom from first arrhythmia event, defined as a sustained episode of atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia. Secondary endpoints will be compared as well (see secondary end point defined). Re-initiation of an antiarrhythmic drug after 3 months will be considered a failure of primary endpoint of arrhythmia free survival. However, Anti-arrhythmic medication use after the blanking period for ventricular arrhythmias will not be included as an event. Anticoagulation is continued and monitored based on previous guidelines with use stratified by baseline stroke risk. A recording (CD) of the mapping during the procedure is to be obtained and retained for possible future analysis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
1. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone to
2. PVI plus total left atrial low voltage-directed ablation.
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone
Radiofrequency ablation procedure to isolate pulmonary veins without other intervention performed..
Radiofrequency ablation
Ablation procedure to eliminate atrial fibrillation
PVI+Total LT Atrial low voltage ablation
PVI radiofrequency ablation along with ablation of areas of "low voltage" identified.
Radiofrequency ablation
Ablation procedure to eliminate atrial fibrillation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Radiofrequency ablation
Ablation procedure to eliminate atrial fibrillation
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.
2. Failed or intolerable to at least 1 one antiarrhythmic drug (AAD).
3. 18-85 year of age at time of consent.
4. Scheduled to undergo a clinically indicated AF ablation procedure.
5. Able and willing to comply with all protocol visit requirements.
6. Signed Patient Informed Consent (ICF).
7. Presence of low voltage in the left atrium on 3-D map during index catheter ablation procedure
Exclusion Criteria
1. History of prior left-sided catheter or surgical ablation for AF or atypical atrial flutter, including MAZE or mini MAZE.
* Prior ablation for typical atrial flutter or left-sided ablation for WPW, AV node reentry tachycardia or focal ectopic atrial tachycardia may be included.
2. Uncontrolled heart Failure or NYHA Class IIIb or IV heart failure.
3. Ejection Fraction \< 0.20.
4. Active ventricular tachycardia requiring treatment with catheter ablation or anti-arrhythmic drug within the last 6 months.
5. Left atrial size \> 60 mm diameter on echocardiogram.
6. "Long standing" persistent AF defined as \> or = 1 year of continuous atrial fibrillation at the time of enrollment.
7. Severe pulmonary hypertension (PAP \> 70 mmHg)
8. Unstable valvular disease.
9. AF secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease or reversible non- cardiac cause.
10. Poor candidate for general anesthesia.
11. Anticipated survival \< 1 year.
12. MI or CABG within 3 months.
13. Left atrial thrombus in pre-procedure imaging within 4 weeks of the ablation procedure.
14. Any documented thromboembolic event within 6 months of the ablation procedure.
15. Contraindication to anticoagulation.
16. Inability to have implantable monitoring device for atrial fibrillation burden with no pre-existing cardiac device that can monitor atrial arrhythmias OR inability to wear external Holter Monitor continuously for 4 weeks.
17. Significant congenital anomaly or medical condition that may affect the integrity of study data.
18. Women who are pregnant - pregnancy test required if pre-menopausal or non-sterile.
19. Active enrollment in another investigational study involving a drug or device.
20. Inability to undergo complete voltage mapping in normal sinus rhythm - see intraprocedural protocol.
21. Presence of any medical or psychological condition or medical non-compliance history that may adversely impact study outcomes.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Biosense Webster, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Ohad Ziv
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ohad Ziv
Director, Cardiac Electrophysiology, Principal Investigator, Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ohad Ziv, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MetroHealth System, Ohio
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MetroHealth Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, Conti JB, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Murray KT, Sacco RL, Stevenson WG, Tchou PJ, Tracy CM, Yancy CW; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):e1-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Mar 28. No abstract available.
Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen SA, Crijns HJ, Damiano RJ Jr, Davies DW, DiMarco J, Edgerton J, Ellenbogen K, Ezekowitz MD, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Hindricks G, Iesaka Y, Jackman W, Jalife J, Jais P, Kalman J, Keane D, Kim YH, Kirchhof P, Klein G, Kottkamp H, Kumagai K, Lindsay BD, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, McCarthy PM, Mont JL, Morady F, Nademanee K, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Packer DL, Pappone C, Prystowsky E, Raviele A, Reddy V, Ruskin JN, Shemin RJ, Tsao HM, Wilber D. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Mar;33(2):171-257. doi: 10.1007/s10840-012-9672-7.
Themistoclakis S, Raviele A, China P, Pappone C, De Ponti R, Revishvili A, Aliot E, Kuck KH, Hoff PI, Shah D, Almendral J, Manolis AS, Chierchia GB, Oto A, Vatasescu RG, Sinkovec M, Cappato R; Atrial Fibrillation Survey Investigators. Prospective European survey on atrial fibrillation ablation: clinical characteristics of patients and ablation strategies used in different countries. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Oct;25(10):1074-81. doi: 10.1111/jce.12462. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
Lin YJ, Chang SL, Lo LW, Hu YF, Chong E, Chao TF, Chung FP, Liao J, Li CH, Tsao HM, Kao T, Chen YY, Huang JL, Chen SA. A prospective and randomized comparison of limited versus extensive atrial substrate modification after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Aug;25(8):803-812. doi: 10.1111/jce.12407. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
Nademanee K, McKenzie J, Kosar E, Schwab M, Sunsaneewitayakul B, Vasavakul T, Khunnawat C, Ngarmukos T. A new approach for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: mapping of the electrophysiologic substrate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jun 2;43(11):2044-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.054.
Hwang C, Chen PS. Ligament of Marshall: why it is important for atrial fibrillation ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2009 Dec;6(12 Suppl):S35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.08.034.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB17-00025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.