Pulsed Field or Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure

NCT ID: NCT07181291

Last Updated: 2026-02-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

700 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-01

Study Completion Date

2026-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) are at particularly high cardiovascular risk. Rhythm-control by means of catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) reduces all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for worsening heart failure in these patients. Considering the globally increasing use of the novel "pulsed-field ablation", it is necessary to determine whether this technique can be performed with the same safety and efficacy as the established cryoballoon ablation (CRYO) in this critically ill patient population.

This retrospective, international, multicenter study compares the efficacy and safety of PFA versus CRYO in patients with AF and HFrEF (LVEF ≤40%) undergoing a first-time PVI-only procedure.

Using propensity-score matching to minimize selection bias, the study will retrospectively evaluate whether a non-thermal PFA approach is non-inferior to the established thermal CRYO technique regarding rhythm control, while comparing procedural safety and efficiency in this high-risk population. Non-inferiority is tested against the assumption of a 12-month recurrence rate of 30% with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 12% (corresponding to a hazard ratio of 1.53).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cryoballoon pulmonary-vein isolation

Electrical isolation of the pulmonary-veins using cryoenergy

PVI

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

pulmonary-vein isolation

Pulsed field pulmonary-vein isolation

Electrical isolation of the pulmonary-veins using pulsed field energy

PVI

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

pulmonary-vein isolation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PVI

pulmonary-vein isolation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF and echocardiographically confirmed HFrEF (LVEF ≤ 40%)
2. Patients who underwent their first PVI using pulsed field or cryoballoon ablation as part of clinical routine
3. Patients with regular follow-up via 12-lead ECG or Holter ECG following PVI
4. Patients with at least three months of follow-up

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients who did not undergo pulsed field or cryoballoon ablation for first-time PVI
2. Patients with LVEF \> 40%
3. Patients who declined the use of their data during initial collection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St. Josefs-Hospital Wiesbaden GmbH

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joachim Ehrlich, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St. Josefs-Hospital Wiesbaden GmbH

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vancouver General Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Montreal Heart Institute

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Kerckhoff-Klinik Bad Nauheim

Bad Nauheim, , Germany

Site Status

Vivantes Klinikum am Urban

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main

Frankfurt am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Fürth

Fürth, , Germany

Site Status

Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe

Hagen, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Hamburg-Eppendorf, , Germany

Site Status

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

St. Josefs-Hospital Wiesbaden

Wiesbaden, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PFA vs CRYO for AF-HFrEF

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.