Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Conventional Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Repeat PVI in Patients With Paroxysmal AF

NCT ID: NCT06199180

Last Updated: 2024-12-10

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: RECRUITING
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 154 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2024-09-20
• Study Completion Date: 2028-09-30

Brief Summary

Various methods exist for performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), including thermal ablation and pulse-field ablation (PFA). However, in cases requiring a second PVI for recurrent AF, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is utilized in nearly 95% of instances post-acquiring a 3D high-density map from the left atrium (LA). Up to 85% of patients experiencing recurrent AF after the initial PVI exhibit pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections, often identified as the cause of AF.

PFA has demonstrated its safety and efficiency compared to RFA as a swift technique for performing ablation. Yet, whether PFA or RFA stands out as superior or safer when applied for a second PVI remains unclear, as no randomized controlled trial has investigated this comparison. The proposed REPEAT-AF trial aims to randomize 154 AF patients experiencing recurrent AF after the initial PVI, assigning them in a 1:1 ratio to either RFA or PFA. Each patient will receive an implantable cardiac monitor to precisely detect any AF recurrences.

Detailed Description

All participating patients are required to provide written (or equivalent) informed consent, indicated by a dated signature of the subject or legal representative. The consent process must comply with applicable national regulations and use language understandable by the patient.

The study will be conducted at 6 clinical centres/investigational sites across the Netherlands. Patients will be randomized (1:1) into a PFA or point-by-point RF ablation arm. Randomization will occur prior to the ablation procedure. A implantable cardiac monitor will be implanted in all randomised patients one month before ablation to accurately monitor any AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/ atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. Treatment allocation will be processed through the Dutch 'National Heart Registry' (NHR) data platform.

Patients randomized to both arms of the study will be evaluated for PV isolation at the start of the ablation procedure. If PV reconnection is identified in patients in the point-by-point RF arm, re-ablation will occur according to the study protocol. Patients in the PFA arm will have PV reconnection determined using the FARAWAVE catheter. Those with no PV reconnection (100% PV isolation/durable PVI) will be followed in an observational registry.

The PFA ablation arm involves the use of the Farastar generator system, Farawave ablation catheter, and Faradrive steering catheter for the procedure. The RF point-by-point ablation arm (control) involves RF ablation following standard practice.

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation Recurrent

Keywords

pulmonary vein isolation; pulsed field ablation; radiofrequency ablation; implantable cardiac monitor

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

Pulsed field ablation

In this group, pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection is identified by the FARAWAVE system. If reconnection is observed, pulsed field ablation (PFA) will be employed for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Should PV reconnection not be detected, the operator will have the discretion to determine the necessary ablation strategies. Patients falling into this category will be included in a concurrent registry.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

pulmonary vein isolation with PFA

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Patients randomised to PFA will undergo PVI with PFA.

Radiofrequency ablation

In this group, patients will undergo the acquisition of a 3D high-density map. If pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection is identified, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) will be employed for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Should PV reconnection not be detected, the operator will have the discretion to determine the necessary ablation strategies. Patients falling into this category will be included in a concurrent registry.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

pulmonary vein isolation with RFA

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Patients randomised to RFA will undergo PVI with point-by-point RFA.

Interventions

pulmonary vein isolation with RFA

Patients randomised to RFA will undergo PVI with point-by-point RFA.

Intervention Type: DEVICE

pulmonary vein isolation with PFA

Patients randomised to PFA will undergo PVI with PFA.

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Patient had 1 previous PVI with either cryoballoon, RF ablation or PFA
• Index PVI occurred within <5 years prior to enrolment
• Documented AF recurrence >30 seconds
• Symptomatic AF
• Paroxysmal AF
• Age >18 and <80 years
• Willing and capable to provide informed consent
• Able and willing to participate in all examinations and follow-up visits and tests associated with this clinical study

Exclusion Criteria

• Persistent AF (by diagnosis of duration >7 days)
• Concomitant/ prior diagnosis for atrial tachycardia (AT) and/or atrial flutter (AFl). Note typical cavotricuspid isthmus dependent flutter is not an exclusion criterium.
• Underwent additional ablations outside the pulmonary veins during index AF ablation
• AF secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, alcohol abuse, or other reversible/non-cardiac causes
• Contraindication to, or unwillingness to use, systematic anticoagulation
• Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30% as documented by transthoracic echo (TTE) (within <3 months prior)
• Left atrial volume index >60 ml/m2
• Clinically significant arrhythmias other than AF
• Previous surgery for AF
• New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class III or IV
• Presence of intramural thrombus, tumour or other abnormality that precludes safe catheter introduction or manipulation
• BMI >35 kg/m2
• Significant or symptomatic hypotension, bradycardia, or chronotropic incompetence
• Chronic renal insufficiency of <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 or any history of renal dialysis, or history of renal transplant
• Hemodynamically significant valvular disease
• Presence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) or atrial septal defect (ASD) closure device
• History of abnormal bleeding and/or clotting disorder
• History of rheumatic fever
• Severe lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, or any lung disease. Only if involving abnormal blood gases or significant dyspnoea
• Clinically significant systemic infection or sepsis
• Life expectancy <1 year
• Sensitivity to contrast media not controlled by pre-medication
• Any of the following within the 3 months prior to enrolment:

• Myocardial infarction
• Unstable angina
• Percutaneous coronary intervention
• Heart failure hospitalization
• Stroke or TIA
• Significant bleeding
• Pericarditis/effusions
• Left atrial thrombus
• Coronary artery bypass grafting/atriotomy within 6 months prior
• Organ or haematologic transplant, or currently being evaluated for an organ transplant
• Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 80 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role: collaborator

University Medical Center Groningen

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Yuri Blaauw, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UMCG

Locations

UMCG

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Yuri Blaauw, Dr.

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +31503616161

Email: y.blaauw01@umcg.nl

Nick van Vreeswijk, drs.

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +31503616161

Email: n.l.van.vreeswijk@umcg.nl

Facility Contacts

Yuri Blaauw, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Nick van Vreeswijk, MD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

REPEAT-AF trial

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id