Prospective Assessment of Premature Ventricular Contractions Suppression in Cardiomyopathy(PAPS)
NCT ID: NCT03228823
Last Updated: 2021-04-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-08-01
2021-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This clinical pilot study will enroll 36 patients with frequent PVCs (burden \>10%) and CM (LVEF \<45%) and randomize them to either: 1) RFA or 2) AADs. Prior to treatment, patients will undergo a baseline cardiac MR if clinically indicated followed by 3-month observation period (optimal HF medical therapy). Changes in LV function/scar, PVC burden/arrhythmias and clinical/functional status (QOL, HF symptoms and admissions, NYHA class) and adverse events will be assessed throughout the observation period and compare with PVC suppression strategies (RFA or AAD). Similar comparison will be made between RFA and AAD treatment groups during a 12-month follow up using a Prospective Randomized Open, Blinded End-point (PROBE) study design. The treatment regimens will be compared in an intention-to-treat analysis. In addition, a total of 20,000 consecutive ambulatory ECG Holter monitors from all participating centers will be screened to identify all patients with probable diagnosis of PVC-CM.
This pilot study is intended to estimate the prevalence of this clinical entity and pave the way for a large full scale randomized trial to identify best treatment strategy for patients with PVC-CM. Treating and reversing this underestimated PVC-CM may improve patient's health and subsequently decrease HF healthcare spending.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Study of the CardioFocus Endoscopic Ablation System - Adaptive Contact (EAS-AC) for the Treatment of Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation
NCT00971204
Video Assisted Pericardioscopic Surgery: Minimal-invasive Implantation of Epimyocardial Pacemaker Leads in Humans
NCT03387488
Bipolar Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) Study
NCT02374476
His-pacing and AV-node Ablation vs. Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation
NCT04512586
Pulmonary Vein Isolation To Reduce Future Risk Of Atrial Fibrillation In Patients Undergoing Typical Flutter
NCT01710150
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective. PAPS pilot study is a randomized clinical trial to assess the feasibility of enrolling, randomizing treatment strategies and retaining participants with frequent PVCs and associated CM.
Hypotheses. Our main hypotheses of the PAPS pilot study are:
1. A large-scale randomized PAPS clinical study is feasible with minimal barriers of enrollment, treatment crossover and drop out due to a unique design including a short observation period and PVC suppression strategy in all participants.
2. The rate of responders (defined as improvement of LVEF ≥ 10% points) with HF medical therapy alone during observation period will be less than 15%. In contrast, RFA and AADs will have a responder rate of at least 35% in the same population. Furthermore, RFA will have a greater 1-year response rate when compared to AAD therapy.
3. RFA will have a lower rate of composite adverse events (worsening NYHA class, HF admission, treatment side effects \& complications, and death), arrhythmia burden and a better long-term tolerance than AADs.
Methods. A prospective clinical pilot study is planned to prove the feasibility of a large-scale multicenter clinical trial (PAPS study) of patients with probable PVC-CM. This pilot study will enroll 36 patients with frequent PVCs (burden ≥10%) and CM (LVEF ≤45%) and randomize them to either: 1) RFA or 2) AADs. Prior to treatment, all patients will undergo a baseline cardiac MR if clinically indicated and be allowed a 3-month observation period (optimal HF medical therapy). To assess the effects of PVC suppression, changes in LV function, rate of responders (defined above), PVC burden/arrhythmias and clinical/functional status (QOL, HF symptoms and admissions, NYHA class) and adverse events will be compared between observation period and both PVC suppression strategies (RFA or AAD). To identify the best PVC suppression strategy, similar comparisons between RFA and AAD treatment groups will be performed at 12-month follow up using a Prospective Randomized Open, Blinded End-point (PROBE) study design. The treatment regimens will be compared in an intention-to-treat analysis.
In summary, the multicenter PAPS pilot study is intended to better estimate the prevalence of PVC-CM, prove feasibility and rates of clinical outcomes. This pilot study with a multidisciplinary approach will pave the way for a large-scale randomized PAPS trial to identify the best treatment strategy for patients with PVC-CM. Treating and reversing PVC-CM with its associated HF morbidity and mortality will impact not only healthcare spending, but most importantly it will improve patient's health, quality of life and long-term prognosis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Radiofrequency Ablation
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) will be performed after 3-month observation period. EPS and RFA will be performed using standard techniques and protocols similar to those patients that do not participate in this clinical study. In the event of polymorphic PVCs, all morphologies are to be targeted for ablation
Radiofrequency ablation
RFA to achieve PVC suppression will be performed using standard techniques and protocols similar to those patients that do not participate in this clinical study.
Antiarrhythmic Drug
Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) will be only initiated after 3-month observation period. AAD therapy of choice is amiodarone. Amiodarone loading dose of 10 grams is recommended, followed by maintenance dose of 200-400mg daily to achieve successful PVC suppression. Investigators define successful PVC suppression only if ≥ 80% absolute reduction in PVC burden is achieved after a drug or intervention. Alternatively, sotalol and/or propafenone could be considered at discretion of electrophysiologists (sotalol dose of at least 120mg twice daily, propafenone 150-300mg tid) if there is a significant concern of safety profile of amiodarone.
Amiodarone (Antiarrhythmic drug)
AAD therapy of choice is amiodarone. Amiodarone loading dose of 10 grams is recommended, followed by maintenance dose of 200-400mg daily to achieve successful PVC suppression. Alternatively, sotalol and/or propafenone could be considered at discretion of electrophysiologists (sotalol dose of at least 120mg twice daily, propafenone 150-300mg tid) if there is a significant concern of safety profile of amiodarone.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Radiofrequency ablation
RFA to achieve PVC suppression will be performed using standard techniques and protocols similar to those patients that do not participate in this clinical study.
Amiodarone (Antiarrhythmic drug)
AAD therapy of choice is amiodarone. Amiodarone loading dose of 10 grams is recommended, followed by maintenance dose of 200-400mg daily to achieve successful PVC suppression. Alternatively, sotalol and/or propafenone could be considered at discretion of electrophysiologists (sotalol dose of at least 120mg twice daily, propafenone 150-300mg tid) if there is a significant concern of safety profile of amiodarone.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* PVC burden \> or equal to 10% by at least a 24-hr ambulatory Holter monitor (within 150 days of Enrollment (Day 0)
Exclusion Criteria
* Current amiodarone use or within last 2 months
* Current use of antiarrhythmic drugs class I or III
* Contraindication to amiodarone use or any other class III antiarrhythmic
* Severely symptomatic PVCs (unable to complete 3-month observation period)
* Severe/significant CAD with planned revascularization in the near future
* Complete AV block and pacemaker dependent
* Pacemaker or ICD with \>10% RV pacing
* Severe valvular heart disease or planned valvular/cardiac surgery
* Uncontrolled / untreated endocrinopathies
* Uncontrolled HTN, (systolic BP \>180mmHg or diastolic \>110 mmHg)
* Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
* Systemic infiltrative and immune disorders
* Family history of dilated CM in a first degree relative
* Alcohol abuse or illicit drug use
* Contraindication to short-term acute anticoagulation (due to possible randomization to ablation)
* Atrial fibrillation and flutter with rapid ventricular response with possible tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy
* Possible infectious etiology of cardiomyopathy
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Previous PVC ablation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Virginia Commonwealth University
OTHER
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
University of Calgary
OTHER
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
OTHER
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
Hunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical Center
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jose Huizar
Director, Arrhythmia and Device Clinic
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jose F Huizar, M.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
McGuire VA Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California Los Angeles Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital
Tampa, Florida, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Roxbury VA Medical Center
West Roxbury, Massachusetts, United States
Northwell Health System-Staten Island University Hospital
Staten Island, New York, United States
University of Pennsylvania Medical Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
McGuire VA Medical Center
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Torrado J, Sima A, Comstuck C, Kaszala K, Tan A, Koneru J, Frankel DS, Marchlinski F, Kowalski M, Sharma P, Gerstenfeld EP, Vaseghi M, Shivkumar K, Malhotra R, Morillo C, Ellenbogen KA, Huizar JF. Prevalence of frequent premature ventricular contractions and left-ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients receiving Holter monitoring. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan;36(1):54-61. doi: 10.1111/jce.16478. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NIH ID 9372611
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.