Comparative Study of Magnetocardiography and Emission Computed Tomography.
NCT ID: NCT07078266
Last Updated: 2025-07-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
218 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-07-31
2026-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Currently, the primary method for detecting myocardial ischemia is Emission Computed Tomography (ECT). However, it suffers from limitations such as low spatial resolution and radiation exposure risks.magnetocardiography(MCG) is a non-invasive, contactless medical imaging device that maps localized magnetic signals generated by cardiac electrical activity.The magnetocardiography (MCG) system constructs cardiac magnetic field images by recording biomagnetic signals via a multi-channel sensor array positioned above the thoracic region.MCGcan capture the spatial magnetic field changes of ischemic myocardial cells, and carry out early warning, early diagnosis and positioning detection of myocardial ischemia.
This study is a prospective, multicenter, controlled trial. The study will enroll adult patients presenting with myocardial ischemia symptoms suspected of having coronary heart disease (CHD) or coronary microvascular disease (CMVD), who are scheduled to undergo ECT examination.and a domestically manufactured "ultra-high sensitivity" cardiomagnetic detection device will be used to collect cardiac magnetic images. The ECT examination will be completed within one week. A consistency analysis will be conducted between the cardiac magnetic results and the ECT results to evaluate the early diagnostic efficacy of cardiac magnetic detection for myocardial ischemia. Subgroup analyses will also be performed based on resting and stress conditions.
Primary study endpoints:Diagnostic Performance of MCG in Detecting Myocardial Ischemia: Positive Predictive Value, Specificity, and Sensitivity.
Secondary study endpoint:Concordance and Discrepancies Between MCG and ECT in Diagnosing Myocardial Ischemia.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diagnosis of Myocardial Ischemia With MCG Using SPECT as a Reference Standard
NCT06255769
Research on Diagnosis and Prognosis of Myocardial Ischemia Level Using Magnetocardiography
NCT05718206
Magnetocardiography in the Accurate Identification of Myocardial Infarction
NCT05896826
Magnetocardiography in the Accurate Identification of Severe Coronary Lesions and Myocardial Necrosis
NCT05392712
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Diagnosis, Treatment Guidance and Prognosis of Cardiac Masses (CMR)
NCT07335770
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. Research Objectives This study aims to compare the domestically developed "ultra-sensitive" MCG device with ECT, the gold standard for myocardial ischemia detection, to determine whether the domestic "ultra-sensitive" MCG device can accurately identify myocardial ischemia, thereby exploring its clinical application value.
3. study design This study is a prospective, multi-center comparative study. 3.1 research contents 3.1.1 Recruit participants and collect data Patients who come to our hospital for treatment with myocardial ischemia symptoms such as chest tightness and chest pain and plan to undergo ECT will be informed by the receiving doctor of the clinical study. Patients who are willing to participate in the study will be further communicated with the patient by the investigator to evaluate and confirm whether they meet the inclusion conditions, and inform that the study will collect clinical diagnosis and treatment information such as basic conditions, medical history, laboratory examinations, as well as study-related precautions, and sign informed consent form.
3.1.2 Preparation before magnetic examination Before undergoing magnetic electrocardiogram, the patient's basic information was asked and checked, the past history, alcohol and tobacco status, and the current medical history (the onset time, inducement, symptom characteristics, duration, etc. of chest pain) were recorded, and the subject's blood pressure, height, and weight were measured.
3.1.3 Magnetocardiography and ECT examination MCG images were collected using a domestic "ultra-high-sensitive" MCG detection device, and ECG examinations were performed 10 minutes before and after. ECT examination was completed within 1 week.
3.1.4 Data Entry The subject's diagnostic results, myocardial damage markers, heart failure indicators, electrocardiogram, echocardiography, coronary CTA/angiography, ECT and other laboratory test results were recorded and entered into EDC.
3.2 Data Analysis The consistency of Magnetocardiographic results and ECT results was analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of magnetocardiographic testing in early diagnosis of myocardial ischemia.
3.3 Sample size Estimation In this project sample size calculation was performed to ensure the statistical reliability of the study. By considering factors such as the expected effect size and significance level, an appropriate sample size was determined. This ensures sufficient support for testing the study hypothesis, guarantees scientifically credible results, enhances study reproducibility, and boosts data analysis robustness, thereby making the study conclusions more convincing and reliable.
For testing the non - inferiority of cardiomagnetic evaluation of myocardial ischemia compared to ECT, the sample size estimation used the method for comparing paired two - sample rates in a non - inferiority design and was calculated as follows:
n=(Zα+Zβ)2×(p1(1-p1)+p2(1-p2))/(p1-p2-Δ)2 In the formula: Zα is the critical value of the standard normal distribution; Zβ is the critical value of the standard normal distribution corresponding to the power; P1 and P2 represent the positive rates of the control group and the intervention group, respectively; Δ:non-inferiority margin; α:significance level; β:power of the test. The preliminary experimental results indicated a 77% positive rate for cardiomagnetic detection and 71% for ECT, with α=0.05 (one - sided), β=0.2 (power 80%), and Δ=0.05. We calculated the minimum sample size to be 196 cases, with a total sample size of 196 cases. Considering a dropout rate of 10%, the final determined sample size was 218 cases.
3.4 Statistical Methods Unless otherwise stated, the following general principles will be used for statistical analysis of the study data.
For categorical variables, statistical descriptions will be provided as the number and percentage of participants in each category. For continuous variables, the mean, standard deviation, median, Q1,Q3 and extremes will be listed. Diagnostic efficiency will be evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, AUC, recall, and F1 score for discrimination. Calibration will be assessed via calibration curves and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) test. Subgroup analyses will be conducted for rest ECT and stress ECT groups to compare diagnostic efficiency and consistency. The Pearson correlation coefficient will assess the linear relationship between cardiomagnetic scores and ECT ischemic areas, with the correlation coefficient (r) and significance level (p value) reported. The Kappa coefficient will evaluate the consistency of cardiomagnetic detection with rest and stress ECT in diagnosing myocardial ischemia, with the consistency level reported.
All statistical tests will use a significance level of 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Magnetocardiography examination
Magnetocardiography (MCG) is a non-invasive, risk-free, and contactless technology that characterizes the local magnetic field signals generated by the electrical activity of the heart.
the magnetic signals used in magnetocardiograms can pass through the body with almost no interference. Therefore, magnetocardiography theoretically offers more clinically useful information, with the advantages of being non-invasive, safe, and fast, enabling earlier and more accurate diagnoses of potential heart diseases.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of myocardial ischemia-related symptoms (e.g., angina pectoris) with suspected CHD or CMVD, scheduled for ECT examination
* Signed informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* Cardiac arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, severe sinus bradycardia and sinus pauses, and second - degree or higher - degree atrioventricular block and other severe arrhythmias;
* Aortic dissection aneurysm, severe aortic valve stenosis or insufficiency;
* Elderly or frail patients with neuromuscular or osteoarticular diseases who cannot complete exercise stress ECT; Allergy to drugs used in pharmacologic stress ECT;
* Patients with severe renal insufficiency with an estimated glomerular 6.filtration rate (eGFR) \< 30 ml/min or those undergoing dialysis;
* Patients with malignant tumors and a life - expectancy of less than1 year;
* Pregnant or lactating women;
* Patients unable to undergo MCG examination due to inability to enter the chamber, metallic implant interference, or other conditions deemed unsuitable by researchers.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
OTHER
Yang Jing
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yang Jing
Associate Researcher
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2025-28
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.