Impact of Local Lidocaine Paravertebral Cervical Injection on Cervicogenic Dizziness Symptoms
NCT ID: NCT07053176
Last Updated: 2025-07-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
PHASE4
42 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-08-01
2025-09-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Does Low-does Cervical Epidural Lidocaine Cause Transient Weakness?
NCT03382925
Efficacy and Safety of Diclofenac 1.16% Gel in Subjects With Acute Neck Pain
NCT01335724
Evaluation of the Impact of Tractions vs. Placebo Tractions in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy
NCT05952167
Repeated Transforaminal Anesthetic Injections With or Without Glucocorticoid in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy
NCT03541681
Effect of Cervical Traction on Balance in Cervical Radiculopathy Patients
NCT04598113
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lidocaine
patients will received lidocaine paravertebral injection
0.5% Lidocaine
0.5% lidocaine injection will be administered in the paravertebral intramuscular region with 12 mm, 30 G needle from C2 to C7 bilaterally
Sham
patients will received saline solution paravertebral injection
Saline Solution (NaCl 0,9%)
saline solution will be administered bilaterally in the paravertebral intamuscular region from C2 to C7 with 12 mm 30 G needle
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
0.5% Lidocaine
0.5% lidocaine injection will be administered in the paravertebral intramuscular region with 12 mm, 30 G needle from C2 to C7 bilaterally
Saline Solution (NaCl 0,9%)
saline solution will be administered bilaterally in the paravertebral intamuscular region from C2 to C7 with 12 mm 30 G needle
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. presence of trauma or recent surgery in the head, face, neck, or chest; an otorhinolaryngological diagnosis of central or peripheral vertigo, and receiving physiotherapy or other treatment during the study period.
3. allergy to lidocaine
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Uniter Onlus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alessandro Micarelli
UNITER ONLUS
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Uniter Onlus
Fara in Sabina, Rieti, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ferrara PE, Ronconi G, Viscito R, Pascuzzo R, Rosulescu E, Ljoka C, Maggi L, Ferriero G, Foti C. Efficacy of mesotherapy using drugs versus normal saline solution in chronic spinal pain: a retrospective study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017 Jun;40(2):171-174. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000214.
Micarelli A, Viziano A, Augimeri I, Micarelli B, Capoccia D, Alessandrini M. Diagnostic route of cervicogenic dizziness: usefulness of posturography, objective and subjective testing implementation and their correlation. Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Jun;43(12):1730-1737. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1680747. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
Micarelli A, Viziano A, Carlino P, Granito I, Micarelli RX, Alessandrini M. Reciprocal roles of joint position error, visual dependency and subjective perception in cervicogenic dizziness. Somatosens Mot Res. 2020 Dec;37(4):262-270. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2020.1803257. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
Karadas O, Inan LE, Ulas U, Odabasi Z. Efficacy of local lidocaine application on anxiety and depression and its curative effect on patients with chronic tension-type headache. Eur Neurol. 2013;70(1-2):95-101. doi: 10.1159/000350619. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
Raeissadat SA, Rayegani SM, Sadeghi F, Rahimi-Dehgolan S. Comparison of ozone and lidocaine injection efficacy vs dry needling in myofascial pain syndrome patients. J Pain Res. 2018 Jun 29;11:1273-1279. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S164629. eCollection 2018.
Mellick LB, Mellick GA. Treatment of acute orofacial pain with lower cervical intramuscular bupivacaine injections: a 1-year retrospective review of 114 patients. J Orofac Pain. 2008 Winter;22(1):57-64.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NeuralCGD1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.