Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Patients With Isolated Cervical Dystonia (CD)
NCT ID: NCT07014384
Last Updated: 2025-06-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-15
2025-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
tDCS in Cervical Dystonia
NCT02180139
Computer Modelling of the Cervical Spine Movements in Cervical Dystonia
NCT02894359
Identification of Optimal Stimulation Site for Cervical Dystonia Symptoms: An Exploratory Study
NCT01859247
Integration of the Cervical Proprioceptive Signals in Patients With Cervical Dystonia
NCT02834871
Non-Motor Features of Cervical Dystonia (CD)
NCT03471923
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One of the challenges in treating CD is the incomplete understanding of its underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. Recently, CD has been recognized as a network disorder, affecting the basal ganglia, the brainstem, the sensorimotor cortex and the cerebellum. So far, there is increasing evidence supporting the role of the cerebellum in the pathophysiology of dystonia, including animal models, neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies, but the exact the role in the proposed dystonia network is only incompletely understood.
TDCS is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation modulating the excitability of superficially located neurons. CtDCS is known to modulate the excitability of neurons of the cerebellar cortex, while the cerebellar nuclei and the brain stem remain unaffected. It has been shown that anodal ctDCS increases and cathodal ctDCS decreases the excitability of the cerebellum.
This randomized and sham-controlled clinical trial aims to investigate the effects of anodal and cathodal ctDCS in CD patients, focusing on both the sensorimotor network excitability and motor symptom severity. Participants will undergo three separated experimental sessions separated by one week, each with a different stimulation condition: anodal, cathodal, and sham ctDCS. Both, the study participants and the experimenter will be blinded to the order of stimulation mode.
The outcome measures will include:
1. Changes in the sensorimotor network before and after ctDCS stimulation, assessed by TMS. Measurements include four main metrics to determine the neurophysiological properties of the sensorimotor network in different ways:
1. Single-pulse TMS (SP-TMS) of the left primary motor cortex, used to quantify the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to unconditioned stimuli,
2. Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI),
3. Short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI),
4. Cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI).
2. Clinical motor symptom severity, assessed with the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) before and after each session.
This study aims to improve the understanding of the neurophysiological mechanisms and clinical effects of ctDCS in isolated CD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Anodal ctDCS
Patients receive anodal ctDCS stimulation for 20 minutes with 2 mA
Anodal and cathodal ctDCS
CtDCS will be delivered using an DC-stimulator and two saline-soaked sponge electrodes: one electrode placed 3 cm lateral to the right of the inion, the other electrode on the right buccinator muscle. A 2 mA current will be delivered through these electrodes for a duration of 20 minutes with a 8-second fade-in and fade-out.
Cathodal ctDCS
Patients receive cathodal ctDCS stimulation for 20 minutes with 2 mA
Anodal and cathodal ctDCS
CtDCS will be delivered using an DC-stimulator and two saline-soaked sponge electrodes: one electrode placed 3 cm lateral to the right of the inion, the other electrode on the right buccinator muscle. A 2 mA current will be delivered through these electrodes for a duration of 20 minutes with a 8-second fade-in and fade-out.
Sham stimulation
Patients receive ctDCS stimulation for 20 minutes with 0 mA
Sham stimulation
The tDCS procedure will be identical to the active (anodal and cathodal) stimulation condition, but stimulation will cease after 30 seconds.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anodal and cathodal ctDCS
CtDCS will be delivered using an DC-stimulator and two saline-soaked sponge electrodes: one electrode placed 3 cm lateral to the right of the inion, the other electrode on the right buccinator muscle. A 2 mA current will be delivered through these electrodes for a duration of 20 minutes with a 8-second fade-in and fade-out.
Sham stimulation
The tDCS procedure will be identical to the active (anodal and cathodal) stimulation condition, but stimulation will cease after 30 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Written informed consent by the patient
Exclusion Criteria
* Secondary dystonia
* Severe head tremor
* Intake of centrally acting medication
* Contraindications to TMS, such as metallic implants, pregnancy and history of seizures
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Simone Zittel
Dr. med.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ugawa Y, Uesaka Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Kanazawa I. Magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum in humans. Ann Neurol. 1995 Jun;37(6):703-13. doi: 10.1002/ana.410370603.
Porcacchia P, Alvarez de Toledo P, Rodriguez-Baena A, Martin-Rodriguez JF, Palomar FJ, Vargas-Gonzalez L, Jesus S, Koch G, Mir P. Abnormal cerebellar connectivity and plasticity in isolated cervical dystonia. PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211367. eCollection 2019.
Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3(Pt 3):633-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.
Hamada M, Strigaro G, Murase N, Sadnicka A, Galea JM, Edwards MJ, Rothwell JC. Cerebellar modulation of human associative plasticity. J Physiol. 2012 May 15;590(10):2365-74. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.230540. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
Grimm K, Prilop L, Schon G, Gelderblom M, Misselhorn J, Gerloff C, Zittel S. Cerebellar Modulation of Sensorimotor Associative Plasticity Is Impaired in Cervical Dystonia. Mov Disord. 2023 Nov;38(11):2084-2093. doi: 10.1002/mds.29586. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
Brighina F, Romano M, Giglia G, Saia V, Puma A, Giglia F, Fierro B. Effects of cerebellar TMS on motor cortex of patients with focal dystonia: a preliminary report. Exp Brain Res. 2009 Feb;192(4):651-6. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1572-9. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
Albanese A, Bhatia K, Bressman SB, Delong MR, Fahn S, Fung VS, Hallett M, Jankovic J, Jinnah HA, Klein C, Lang AE, Mink JW, Teller JK. Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):863-73. doi: 10.1002/mds.25475. Epub 2013 May 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Cereb_tDCS_in_CD
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.