Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
33 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-03-26
2019-12-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Integration of the Cervical Proprioceptive Signals in Patients With Cervical Dystonia
NCT02834871
Scapular and Cervical Neuromuscular Control Deficits in Musicians With and Without Playing Injuries.
NCT02267395
Identification of Optimal Stimulation Site for Cervical Dystonia Symptoms: An Exploratory Study
NCT01859247
Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Patients With Isolated Cervical Dystonia (CD)
NCT07014384
Effect of Vibro-tactile Stimulation Intensity on Head Posture in Cervical Dystonia
NCT07245615
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators hypothesize that a distinct combination of non-motor symptoms will be more prevalent in the CD group, and therefore this set of symptoms may be indicative of disease development. This combination will be identified through analysis of the concurrence of the non-motor features across the three groups of participants. This study will fill an important unmet need, as to the investigators' knowledge there are no published studies assessing the comorbid presentation of these four non-motor symptoms in a single cervical dystonia population. The exploration of a distinct combination of concurrent non-motor symptoms as a marker for the development of cervical dystonia will improve the ability of movement disorders neurologists to diagnose the condition.
The results of this study will facilitate the investigators' longstanding aim of improving rates of cervical dystonia diagnosis. Cervical dystonia is currently diagnosed based upon the exclusion of other movement disorders; therefore, characterization of non-motor features in cervical dystonia patients will help to refine the diagnostic criteria for this condition. This investigation will also improve understanding of the factors associated with CD. Future studies can examine the source of these associated factors in order to help understand the cause of CD, since the etiology is currently unknown.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CD Patients
Subjects must have a prior diagnosis of cervical dystonia and be capable of participating in all study procedures. Subjects will undergo assessment of non-motor features.
Assessment of Non-Motor Features
All subjects will be assessed for four non-motor symptoms, including (1) spatial discrimination threshold, (2) temporal discrimination threshold, (3) vibration-induced illusion of movement, and (4) kinesthesia.
Family Members
Subjects must be a first order relation of a Vanderbilt patient diagnosed with cervical dystonia. The subject must pass a short neurological examination to ensure the subject does not have cervical dystonia or any sensory deficits. Subjects will undergo assessment of non-motor features.
Neurological Examination
The family members and healthy volunteers will undergo elements of the neurological examination during which the movement disorders neurologist will look specifically for the presence of cervical dystonia and other sensory abnormalities. If the subject is found to have cervical dystonia or any other sensory abnormalities, the subject will be excluded from the study.
Assessment of Non-Motor Features
All subjects will be assessed for four non-motor symptoms, including (1) spatial discrimination threshold, (2) temporal discrimination threshold, (3) vibration-induced illusion of movement, and (4) kinesthesia.
Healthy volunteers
Subjects must be healthy volunteers who are neurologically normal. The subject must pass a short neurological examination to ensure the subject does not have cervical dystonia or any sensory deficits. Subjects will undergo assessment of non-motor features.
Neurological Examination
The family members and healthy volunteers will undergo elements of the neurological examination during which the movement disorders neurologist will look specifically for the presence of cervical dystonia and other sensory abnormalities. If the subject is found to have cervical dystonia or any other sensory abnormalities, the subject will be excluded from the study.
Assessment of Non-Motor Features
All subjects will be assessed for four non-motor symptoms, including (1) spatial discrimination threshold, (2) temporal discrimination threshold, (3) vibration-induced illusion of movement, and (4) kinesthesia.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neurological Examination
The family members and healthy volunteers will undergo elements of the neurological examination during which the movement disorders neurologist will look specifically for the presence of cervical dystonia and other sensory abnormalities. If the subject is found to have cervical dystonia or any other sensory abnormalities, the subject will be excluded from the study.
Assessment of Non-Motor Features
All subjects will be assessed for four non-motor symptoms, including (1) spatial discrimination threshold, (2) temporal discrimination threshold, (3) vibration-induced illusion of movement, and (4) kinesthesia.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Capable of participating in all study procedures
* Willing and able to provide written or verbal informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects who are not considered competent to make their own medical decisions
* Subjects who display sensory deficits during a short screening examination prior to study enrollment
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mallory Hacker
Research Instructor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center Clinical Research Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Crowner BE. Cervical dystonia: disease profile and clinical management. Phys Ther. 2007 Nov;87(11):1511-26. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060272. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
Stacy M. Epidemiology, clinical presentation, and diagnosis of cervical dystonia. Neurol Clin. 2008 May;26 Suppl 1:23-42. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8619(08)80003-5. No abstract available.
Jinnah HA, Berardelli A, Comella C, Defazio G, Delong MR, Factor S, Galpern WR, Hallett M, Ludlow CL, Perlmutter JS, Rosen AR; Dystonia Coalition Investigators. The focal dystonias: current views and challenges for future research. Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):926-43. doi: 10.1002/mds.25567.
Stamelou M, Edwards MJ, Hallett M, Bhatia KP. The non-motor syndrome of primary dystonia: clinical and pathophysiological implications. Brain. 2012 Jun;135(Pt 6):1668-81. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr224. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
Bradley D, Whelan R, Kimmich O, O'Riordan S, Mulrooney N, Brady P, Walsh R, Reilly RB, Hutchinson S, Molloy F, Hutchinson M. Temporal discrimination thresholds in adult-onset primary torsion dystonia: an analysis by task type and by dystonia phenotype. J Neurol. 2012 Jan;259(1):77-82. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6125-7. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
Chen H, Zhao EJ, Zhang W, Lu Y, Liu R, Huang X, Ciesielski-Jones AJ, Justice MA, Cousins DS, Peddada S. Meta-analyses on prevalence of selected Parkinson's nonmotor symptoms before and after diagnosis. Transl Neurodegener. 2015 Jan 8;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2047-9158-4-1. eCollection 2015.
Frima N, Nasir J, Grunewald RA. Abnormal vibration-induced illusion of movement in idiopathic focal dystonia: an endophenotypic marker? Mov Disord. 2008 Feb 15;23(3):373-7. doi: 10.1002/mds.21838.
Molloy FM, Carr TD, Zeuner KE, Dambrosia JM, Hallett M. Abnormalities of spatial discrimination in focal and generalized dystonia. Brain. 2003 Oct;126(Pt 10):2175-82. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg219. Epub 2003 Jun 23.
Fiorio M, Gambarin M, Valente EM, Liberini P, Loi M, Cossu G, Moretto G, Bhatia KP, Defazio G, Aglioti SM, Fiaschi A, Tinazzi M. Defective temporal processing of sensory stimuli in DYT1 mutation carriers: a new endophenotype of dystonia? Brain. 2007 Jan;130(Pt 1):134-42. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl283. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
Bradley D, Whelan R, Walsh R, O'Dwyer J, Reilly R, Hutchinson S, Molloy F, Hutchinson M. Comparing endophenotypes in adult-onset primary torsion dystonia. Mov Disord. 2010 Jan 15;25(1):84-90. doi: 10.1002/mds.22889.
Westenberger A, Klein C. Genetics of dystonia. In: Dystonia and Dystonic Syndromes. ; 2015:27-48. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-1516-9_3.
Putzki N, Stude P, Konczak J, Graf K, Diener HC, Maschke M. Kinesthesia is impaired in focal dystonia. Mov Disord. 2006 Jun;21(6):754-60. doi: 10.1002/mds.20799.
Walsh R, O'Dwyer JP, Sheikh IH, O'Riordan S, Lynch T, Hutchinson M. Sporadic adult onset dystonia: sensory abnormalities as an endophenotype in unaffected relatives. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;78(9):980-3. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.105585.
Bradley D, Whelan R, Walsh R, Reilly RB, Hutchinson S, Molloy F, Hutchinson M. Temporal discrimination threshold: VBM evidence for an endophenotype in adult onset primary torsion dystonia. Brain. 2009 Sep;132(Pt 9):2327-35. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp156. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
Klingelhoefer L, Martino D, Martinez-Martin P, et al. Nonmotor symptoms and focal cervical dystonia: Observations from 102 patients. Basal Ganglia. 2014;4(3-4):117-120. doi:10.1016/j.baga.2014.10.002.
Lobbezoo F, Tanguay R, Thon MT, Lavigne GJ. Pain perception in idiopathic cervical dystonia (spasmodic torticollis). Pain. 1996 Oct;67(2-3):483-91. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(96)03153-3.
Defazio G, Jankovic J, Giel JL, Papapetropoulos S. Descriptive epidemiology of cervical dystonia. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2013 Nov 4;3:tre-03-193-4374-2. doi: 10.7916/D80C4TGJ. eCollection 2013.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
171717
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.