Perioperative Use of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in Anesthetic Management of Spinal Surgery in Children

NCT ID: NCT06965933

Last Updated: 2025-05-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

68 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-31

Study Completion Date

2026-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Testing the hypothesis that in children undergoing spinal surgery, ESP-block will increase the time to emergency anesthesia in the postoperative period compared with intravenous lidocaine infusion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Interventions for congenital or acquired spinal anomalies are usually voluminous and traumatic, which causes a high level of pain stimulation during the perioperative period. Thus, the problem of pain in spinal surgery is extremely important and is one of the main components of successful treatment.

Combined anesthesia using regional techniques (local anesthesia is added to general anesthesia) can be a significant alternative to performing traditional combined anesthesia with high doses of opioids (narcotic painkillers with undesirable side effects). It allows you to follow the principles of multimodal analgesia, with the possibility of rapid recovery of the patient in the postoperative period.

The use of ESPB (spinal straightening plane blockade) in vertebrology has currently been studied only in adult patients. ESPB is effective and safe for postoperative pain relief after lumbar spine surgery. ESPB can reduce the consumption of opioids (narcotic painkillers) after surgery, increase patient satisfaction, and shorten the length of hospitalization.

Currently, the use of the local anesthetic lidocaine as a medicinal agent for intravenous infusion in children, as an alternative to narcotic anesthesia, is also being actively discussed.

A large number of studies indicate the effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine infusion for perioperative anesthesia in adult patients. In pediatric practice, this technique is not widely used due to the lack of evidence base for efficacy and safety.

Intravenous infusion of lidocaine consistently improves analgesic parameters in the adult and pediatric populations in the first 24 hours, while an effective decrease in the consumption of narcotic painkillers is noted by 48 hours.

Intravenous lidocaine has demonstrated antineuropathic, antihyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory effects and is a new method. Numerous studies in adults have demonstrated the beneficial effects of intravenous lidocaine, including improved pain relief with reduced postoperative use of narcotic painkillers, earlier activation, and shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit. To date, the dose ranges studied in the pediatric population have not been associated with serious side effects, and current evidence suggests that intravenous lidocaine administration will be well tolerated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Regional Anesthesia Lidocaine Infusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Blockade of the plane straightening the spine (Erector Spinae Plane Block, ESPB).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ESP block group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The patient will undergo an ESP blockade under the control of ultrasound during the implementation of anesthetic support. A local anesthetic will be injected into the fascial space of the muscles straightening the spine: ropivacaine 0.375%, 3 mg / kg, on both sides.

IV Lidocaine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

IV Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

During the implementation of anesthetic support, the patient will receive a constant intravenous infusion of lidocaine: a loading dose of 1.5 mg/kg/ h (1 hour), followed by an infusion of 1 mg/kg/h for 24 hours during the perioperative period.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ESP block group

The patient will undergo an ESP blockade under the control of ultrasound during the implementation of anesthetic support. A local anesthetic will be injected into the fascial space of the muscles straightening the spine: ropivacaine 0.375%, 3 mg / kg, on both sides.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

IV Lidocaine

During the implementation of anesthetic support, the patient will receive a constant intravenous infusion of lidocaine: a loading dose of 1.5 mg/kg/ h (1 hour), followed by an infusion of 1 mg/kg/h for 24 hours during the perioperative period.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1\. Elective surgery on the thoracic and lumbosacral spine. 2. Signed informed consent to participate in the study; 3. Age 3-17 years.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Contraindications to the use of local anesthetics;
2. Operations on the cervical spine;
3. Contraindications to performing ESPB;
4. The patient's refusal to participate in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Saint Petersburg State University, Russia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Maxim Monastirniy

Anesthesiologist-Intensivist, Research Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maxim Sergeevich Monastirniy

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Saint Petersburg State University, Russia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

SaintPetersburgSU

Saint Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg, Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Maxim Sergeevich Monastirniy

Role: CONTACT

+79818870151

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Maxim Sergeevich Monastyrnyi, Medicinae Doctor (M.D.)

Role: primary

+79818870151

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SaintPetersburgSU

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ESP Block for Post Cesarean Analgesia
NCT05664958 COMPLETED PHASE4
Erector Spinae Block for Spine Surgery
NCT05417113 TERMINATED PHASE4