Hemodynamic Impact of Epidural Anesthesia in Relation to Age in Pediatric Patients.
NCT ID: NCT05543824
Last Updated: 2022-09-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
15 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-09-12
2023-09-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, as it has been mentioned, the epidural carries risks both in the technique itself (wet or intravascular puncture) and subsequently after the injection of medication that generates a sympathetic blockade with arterial hypotension and an increase in compensatory heart rate. Unlike in adult patients, in pediatric patients epidural and subarachnoid anesthesia are better tolerated hemodynamically due to less vagal and sympathetic activity and almost no systemic venodilation. This lower activity of the autonomic nervous system is due to its immaturity, which is why, with the growth of the infant, this anesthetic technique increasingly affects its hemodynamics, being similar to the adult at the age of 8-12 years.
The study hypothesis does not differ from that stated in physiology books and studies, but the investigators seek to identify the direct correlation of age with the different hemodynamic parameters available with current technology (cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, blood pressure ) in pediatric patients after epidural anesthesia.
The study will be carried out in pediatric patients undergoing major surgery that requires the placement of an epidural catheter and invasive blood pressure, without modifying in any way the usual practice of the responsible anesthesiologist. The patient's hemodynamic data will be collected at time 0 (prior to catheter placement), one minute, 5 and 10 minutes after the bolus of local anesthetic administered to measure the child's hemodynamic response and relate it to their age and development. .
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pediatric Caudal Anesthesia Block. And Pain Control
NCT05581940
The Impact of Preemptive Epidural Analgesia on Acute Postoperative Pain in Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery
NCT02813018
Therapeutic Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion Compared With Epidural Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Control in Adult Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial
NCT04017013
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Levobupivacaine During Continuous Caudal Epidural Analgesia in Newborns
NCT06171295
Lidocaine VS Hemodynamic, Metabolic and Hormonal Response
NCT05238506
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Epidural and arterial catheter
Patients who require placement of an epidural catheter to control postoperative pain and invasive blood pressure will be identified, allowing advanced monitoring using the MostCare Up® device. After identification, the objective of the study will be explained and their consent will be requested to collect the data after the intervention, recording the hemodynamic data before and after the initial bolus of local anesthetic administered: 0.25% levobupivacaine, the dose of which is calculated with the Takasaki formula: 0.05ml x weight (kg) x number of dermatomes to anesthetize.
Levobupivacaine
Patients who require placement of an epidural catheter to control postoperative pain and invasive blood pressure will be identified, allowing advanced monitoring using the MostCare Up® device. After identification, the objective of the study will be explained and their consent will be requested to collect the data after the intervention, recording the hemodynamic data before and after the initial bolus of local anesthetic administered: 0.25% levobupivacaine, the dose of which is calculated with the Takasaki formula: 0.05ml x weight (kg) x number of dermatomes to anesthetize
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Levobupivacaine
Patients who require placement of an epidural catheter to control postoperative pain and invasive blood pressure will be identified, allowing advanced monitoring using the MostCare Up® device. After identification, the objective of the study will be explained and their consent will be requested to collect the data after the intervention, recording the hemodynamic data before and after the initial bolus of local anesthetic administered: 0.25% levobupivacaine, the dose of which is calculated with the Takasaki formula: 0.05ml x weight (kg) x number of dermatomes to anesthetize
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Congenital diseases which affect the central nervous system.
* Inability to place an invasive arterial catheter.
0 Years
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Universitario La Fe
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Daniel Pérez
M.D.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Daniel Perez Ajami
Valencia, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gootman PM, Gootman N, Buckley BJ. Maturation of central autonomic control of the circulation. Fed Proc. 1983 Apr;42(6):1648-55.
Martinez-Telleria A., Cano Serrano M.E.: Anestesia epidural lumbar. En Anestesia Locorregional en Pediatria, Blanco Vargas D., Reinoso Barbero F., Cruz Tejado J. Ed. ARAN, 2005, Madrid, Cap.9: 129-143.
Alonso-Inigo JM, Escriba FJ, Carrasco JI, Fas MJ, Argente P, Galvis JM, Llopis JE. Measuring cardiac output in children undergoing cardiac catheterization: comparison between the Fick method and PRAM (pressure recording analytical method). Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Nov;26(11):1097-1105. doi: 10.1111/pan.12997. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REHAEPP-2022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.