Age-Based and Weight-Based Bupivacaine Dosing for Pediatric Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Infra-Umbilical Surgeries

NCT ID: NCT06801600

Last Updated: 2025-01-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-30

Study Completion Date

2025-06-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pediatric anesthesia presents distinctive challenges, particularly concerning appropriate dosage administration of local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia (SA). Spinal anesthesia in infants has been linked to a lower incidence of hypotension, hypoxia, bradycardia, and postoperative apnea in comparison to general anesthesia (GA); ensuring a high level of cardiovascular and respiratory stability.

Additionally, SA has been linked to lower operating room time, post-anesthesia care unit, hospital length of stay, corticosteroid administration, narcotic requirements, postoperative emesis, and cardiopulmonary complications in comparison to GA.

A reduction in systemic blood pressure frequently accompanies neuraxial blocks in adults, necessitating intervention. Nevertheless, spinal, caudal, or epidural blocks administered to children under six years old are not associated with any substantial alterations in blood pressure. In children aged 6 to 10, there is a linear decrease in blood pressure that will reach a plateau at approximately a 30% decrease in those beyond the age of 10. Conversely, younger children require no additional precautions.

Bupivacaine, has a narrow therapeutic index in children, and its dosing requires careful consideration to strike a balance between effective anesthesia and the risk of toxicity. The traditional method of dosing bupivacaine in pediatric spinal anesthesia is based on the child's body weight. This weight-based dosing considers the assumption that children's drug clearance correlates with their body mass. However, this approach might not account for the maturational changes in drug handling by pediatric patients or the variability in spinal column length and cerebrospinal fluid volumes, not always proportional to weight but may evolve with age.

Emerging evidence suggests that age-based dosing may be more effective. It hypothesizes that developmental pharmacokinetics, including changes in body composition, organ function, and drug-receptor differences, can influence bupivacaine metabolism and action more significantly than body mass alone. By accounting for the age-related anatomical and physiological changes, age-based dosing could result in more precise and effective anesthesia with a decreased risk of adverse outcomes.

To the authors knowledge, there is no study comparing age-based and weight-based bupivacaine dosing for pediatric spinal anesthesia in children undergoing elective infra-umbilical surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Anesthesia Local Anesthetic Bupivacaine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Weight-based dosing

Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% dosage will be calculated and administered intrathecally as 0.4 mg/kg or 0.08 ml/kg if body weight ≤ 15 kg and 0.3 mg/kg or 0.06 ml/kg if body weight \> 15 kg

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Weight-based dosing

Intervention Type DRUG

Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% dosage will be calculated and administered intrathecally as 0.4 mg/kg or 0.08 ml/kg if body weight ≤ 15 kg and 0.3 mg/kg or 0.06 ml/kg if body weight \> 15 kg

Age-based dosing group

Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% will be administered at the dose of age divided by 5 (in ml). The age in months after the completion of a year was noted and considered as the next age if it is more than 6 months and the same age if it is ≤ 6 months.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Age-based dosing

Intervention Type DRUG

Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% will be administered at the dose of age divided by 5 (in ml). The age in months after the completion of a year was noted and considered as the next age if it is more than 6 months and the same age if it is ≤ 6 months.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Weight-based dosing

Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% dosage will be calculated and administered intrathecally as 0.4 mg/kg or 0.08 ml/kg if body weight ≤ 15 kg and 0.3 mg/kg or 0.06 ml/kg if body weight \> 15 kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Age-based dosing

Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% will be administered at the dose of age divided by 5 (in ml). The age in months after the completion of a year was noted and considered as the next age if it is more than 6 months and the same age if it is ≤ 6 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA I and II
* Both genders
* Elective infra-umbilical surgeries with anticipated duration ≤ 90 minutes.

Exclusion Criteria

* Guardian refusal.
* Children with major congenital heart disease, including septal defects.
* Patients with neuromuscular disorders or high intracranial pressure.
* Children with spinal deformities or morbid obesity (BMI above the 99th percentile).
* Children with a history or family history of coagulation disorders.
* Children with local infection at the site of skin puncture for spinal anesthesia.
* Children with known allergy to bupivacaine.
* Surgeries requiring head down (Trendelenburg) or prone position.
* Unexpected prolongation of surgery \> 90 minutes.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kareem Mohammed Assem Nawwar

Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Manal M Elgohary, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Cairo University

Hany M Elhady, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cairo University

Kareem MA Nawwar, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cairo University

Bassant A Heikal, M.B.B.Ch.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cairo University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Kareem MA Nawwar, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

+201003878369

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MS-503-2024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.