Analgesic Efficacy of Lidocaine Plus Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Alone Caudally
NCT ID: NCT03911648
Last Updated: 2019-04-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
86 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-07-01
2018-08-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Hemodynamic Effects of Different Volumes of Bupivacaine 0.25% Caudal Blocks in Pediatrics Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgeries as Measured by Electrical Cardiometry
NCT05133687
Age-Based and Weight-Based Bupivacaine Dosing for Pediatric Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Infra-Umbilical Surgeries
NCT06801600
Caudal Ketamine-bupivacaine More Effective Than Bupivacaine-saline
NCT05444036
The Use of Lignocaine and Bupivacaine Mix in Adult Safe Male Circumcision
NCT02245126
Caudal Block With Tramadol and Levobupivacaine or Bupivacaine
NCT01974843
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group B;
Patients had 0.5 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.25% caudally, the maximum given volume was 20 ml. N=42
0.5 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.25%
Caudally
Group L;
Patients had 0.5 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.25% with the addition of 3 mg/kg lidocaine 1% caudally, the maximum given volume was 20 ml. N=44
0.5 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.25% with the addition of 3 mg/kg lidocaine 1%
Caudally
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
0.5 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.25%
Caudally
0.5 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.25% with the addition of 3 mg/kg lidocaine 1%
Caudally
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient underwent elective circumcision operation under general anesthesia and caudal analgesia.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who had unsuccessful caudal block.
2 Years
11 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ayancık State Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ayse Gulsah Atasever
Resident Anesthesiologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
ayse gulsah atasever, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ayancık State Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ayancık State Hospital
Sinop, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Atasever AG, Ermis O, Demir BS, Kasali K, Karadeniz MS. Comparison of bupivacaine alone and in a combination with lidocaine for caudal block in patients undergoing circumcision: A historical cohort study. Turk J Urol. 2019 Nov 29;46(3):243-248. doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.19191. Print 2020 May.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Brennan J. Modern day-case anaesthesia for children. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:91-103.
Suresh S et al. Are Caudal Blocks for Pain Control Safe in Children? An Analysis of 18,650 Caudal Blocks from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN) Database. Anesth Analgesia. 2015;120:151-156
Nancy B et al. Regional anesth and Pain Management for the Pediatric Patient. ınternatıonal anesthesıology clınıcs:2012; 50,4,83-95
Corliss A, Alyssa A, Timothy J, Danielle A Hamilton. Buffered lidocaine and bupivacaine mixture - the ideal local anesthetic solution? Plast Surg 2015: 23; 2, 87-90
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019/366
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.