Caudal Block With Tramadol and Levobupivacaine or Bupivacaine

NCT ID: NCT01974843

Last Updated: 2014-02-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

68 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Caudal block is the regional anesthetic technique that is used most frequently in pediatric surgery. Opioid drugs have been added to local anesthetic solutions to prolong duration of analgesia but ideal combination were not found that has minimal adverse effect. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of equal concentrations of bupivacaine plus tramadol or levobupivacaine plus tramadol in pediatric patients undergoing minor urological surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sixty-eight children aged 2 to 7 years who were undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy or orchidopexy received bupivacaine 0.25% plus tramadol 2 mg/kg (BT group) or levobupivacaine 0.25% plus tramadol 2 mg/kg (LT group) by the caudal route after laryngeal mask anesthesia. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the duration and quality of postoperative analgesia. The postoperative pain relief was evaluated by the Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. In addition, the time of first analgesic requirement was noted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group BT

Bupivacaine-tramadol (BT) group received a caudal injection of bupivacaine 0.25% plus tramadol 2 mg/kg

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

in the bupivacaine-tramadol (BT) group received a caudal injection of bupivacaine 0.25% plus tramadol 2 mg/kg (maximum doses; 35 mg bupivacaine plus 35 mg tramadol)

Group LT

Levobupivacaine-tramadol (LT) group received a caudal injection of levobupivacaine 0.25% plus tramadol 2 mg/kg, resulting in a total volume of 1 ml/kg.

Levobupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

in the levobupivacaine-tramadol (LT) group received a caudal injection of levobupivacaine 0.25% plus tramadol 2 mg/kg (maximum doses; 35 mg levobupivacaine plus 35 mg tramadol), resulting in a total volume of 1 ml/kg at maximum volume of 15 ml

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Levobupivacaine

in the levobupivacaine-tramadol (LT) group received a caudal injection of levobupivacaine 0.25% plus tramadol 2 mg/kg (maximum doses; 35 mg levobupivacaine plus 35 mg tramadol), resulting in a total volume of 1 ml/kg at maximum volume of 15 ml

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine

in the bupivacaine-tramadol (BT) group received a caudal injection of bupivacaine 0.25% plus tramadol 2 mg/kg (maximum doses; 35 mg bupivacaine plus 35 mg tramadol)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Chirocaine, Abbott Lab, Nycomed Pharma, Norway Marcaine, Astra Zeneca, UK

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA I,
* 2 to 7 years old children
* Elective inguinal herniorrhaphy or orchidopexy operation

Exclusion Criteria

* Infection at the site of block, bleeding diathesis, pre-existing neurological or spinal disease, or abnormalities of the sacrum) or with a known allergy to local anesthetics were excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

7 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Duzce University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

gulbin sezen

assistant of professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duzce University Medicine School, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department

Düzce, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Silvani P, Camporesi A, Agostino MR, Salvo I. Caudal anesthesia in pediatrics: an update. Minerva Anestesiol. 2006 Jun;72(6):453-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16682915 (View on PubMed)

Locatelli B, Ingelmo P, Sonzogni V, Zanella A, Gatti V, Spotti A, Di Marco S, Fumagalli R. Randomized, double-blind, phase III, controlled trial comparing levobupivacaine 0.25%, ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25% by the caudal route in children. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Mar;94(3):366-71. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei059. Epub 2004 Dec 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15608043 (View on PubMed)

Yildiz TS, Ozdamar D, Bagus F, Solak M, Toker K. Levobupivacaine-tramadol combination for caudal block in children: a randomized, double-blinded, prospective study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Jun;20(6):524-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03296.x. Epub 2010 Apr 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20412459 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.paccjournal.com/

caudal block usage in pediatric patients

http://www.nysora.com/

performing of caudal block in pediatric patients

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DZC-160

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Caudal Versus Rectus Sheath Study
NCT01394523 TERMINATED PHASE2/PHASE3