Caudal Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine Plus Two Doses of Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia in Children

NCT ID: NCT02385435

Last Updated: 2015-03-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

91 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this prospective randomized double-blind study was to compare the analgesic efficacy and the side effects of two doses of dexmedetomidine (1 and 2 µg.kg-1) co-administered with bupivacaine with bupivacaine alone for caudal analgesia in children undergoing infra-umbilical surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

* Quality assurance plan for data validation and registry: After Data was registered, it was reviewed by a second person who compared it to the Data in patient data collection forms.
* Data check: carried out using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) variable definition protocols. Also data were entered in EXCEL sheets for comparisons to guarantee consistency.
* Source data verification: Paper case report forms and medical records.
* Standard Operating Procedures to address registry operations and analysis activities: Eligible patients were recruited after obtaining consent. Data was collected by qualified personnel rained on the process. Data was entered into Excel sheets and SPSS programs and compared for consistency. Analysis of Data was carried out by a qualified statistician. Adverse events were reported as yes/no variables. Data of patients who had Change in management was omitted from analysis.
* Sample size assessment: Sample size was calculated to detect a 65% reduction in the analgesic requirement during the first 24 h from 75% in the bupivacaine group with α= 0.05 and β=0.80.
* Plan for missing data: Patients with missing Data were omitted from statistical analysis.
* Statistical analysis plan: carried out using International Business Machines (IBM) statistics 19.0 statistical package for windows. Data were compared using analysis of variance for continuous variables, Kruskal-Wallis test for ordinal, and chi square test for categorical ones. Post hoc analyses were carried out as appropriate.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bupivacaine

single shot caudal plain bupivacaine at a dose of 2mg/kg is used as a reference control drug.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Caudal Bupivacaine 2 mg/kg single shot

dexmedetomidine 1μg.kg-1

Single shot Caudal dexmedetomidine 1μg.kg-1 used as the second arm intervention

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

dexmedetomidine 1μg.kg-1

Intervention Type DRUG

Caudal dexmedetomidine 1μg.kg-1, single shot

dexmedetomidine 2μg.kg-1

Single shot Caudal dexmedetomidine 2 μg.kg-1 used as the second arm intervention

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

dexmedetomidine 2μg.kg-1

Intervention Type DRUG

Caudal dexmedetomidine 2μg.kg-1, single shot

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bupivacaine

Caudal Bupivacaine 2 mg/kg single shot

Intervention Type DRUG

dexmedetomidine 1μg.kg-1

Caudal dexmedetomidine 1μg.kg-1, single shot

Intervention Type DRUG

dexmedetomidine 2μg.kg-1

Caudal dexmedetomidine 2μg.kg-1, single shot

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Broup B Group BD1 Group BD2

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) - I
* Scheduled for lower abdominal and perineal surgery
* Under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* history of developmental delay or mental retardation
* known or suspected coagulopathy or recent use of anticoagulant/antiplatelet drugs.
* known allergy to any of the study drugs.
* any signs of infection or congenital abnormalities at the site of the proposed caudal block
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Jordan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Khaled Radian Al-zaben

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

khaled R Al-zaben

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Jordan

Ibraheem Y Qudaisat

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Jordan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tong Y, Ren H, Ding X, Jin S, Chen Z, Li Q. Analgesic effect and adverse events of dexmedetomidine as additive for pediatric caudal anesthesia: a meta-analysis. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Dec;24(12):1224-30. doi: 10.1111/pan.12519. Epub 2014 Sep 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25203847 (View on PubMed)

She YJ, Zhang ZY, Song XR. Caudal dexmedetomidine decreases the required concentration of levobupivacaine for caudal block in pediatric patients: a randomized trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Dec;23(12):1205-12. doi: 10.1111/pan.12278. Epub 2013 Oct 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24383602 (View on PubMed)

Bharti N, Praveen R, Bala I. A dose-response study of caudal dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine in pediatric day care patients undergoing lower abdominal and perineal surgeries: a randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Nov;24(11):1158-63. doi: 10.1111/pan.12478. Epub 2014 Jul 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25040840 (View on PubMed)

Saadawy I, Boker A, Elshahawy MA, Almazrooa A, Melibary S, Abdellatif AA, Afifi W. Effect of dexmedetomidine on the characteristics of bupivacaine in a caudal block in pediatrics. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Feb;53(2):251-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01818.x. Epub 2008 Dec 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19076110 (View on PubMed)

El-Hennawy AM, Abd-Elwahab AM, Abd-Elmaksoud AM, El-Ozairy HS, Boulis SR. Addition of clonidine or dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine prolongs caudal analgesia in children. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Aug;103(2):268-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep159. Epub 2009 Jun 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19541679 (View on PubMed)

Findlow D, Aldridge LM, Doyle E. Comparison of caudal block using bupivacaine and ketamine with ilioinguinal nerve block for orchidopexy in children. Anaesthesia. 1997 Nov;52(11):1110-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.204-az0346.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9404178 (View on PubMed)

Xiang Q, Huang DY, Zhao YL, Wang GH, Liu YX, Zhong L, Luo T. Caudal dexmedetomidine combined with bupivacaine inhibit the response to hernial sac traction in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Mar;110(3):420-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes385. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23161357 (View on PubMed)

Konakci S, Adanir T, Yilmaz G, Rezanko T. The efficacy and neurotoxicity of dexmedetomidine administered via the epidural route. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 May;25(5):403-9. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507003079. Epub 2007 Dec 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18088445 (View on PubMed)

Wu HH, Wang HT, Jin JJ, Cui GB, Zhou KC, Chen Y, Chen GZ, Dong YL, Wang W. Does dexmedetomidine as a neuraxial adjuvant facilitate better anesthesia and analgesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 26;9(3):e93114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093114. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24671181 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

University of jordan

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Spinal Analgesia in Labour Pain
NCT07332130 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1