Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthesia in Quadratus Lumborum Block After Cesarean Delivery
NCT ID: NCT04748224
Last Updated: 2022-07-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-02-02
2022-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
in this double blinded randomized controlled trial, the investigators compare the analgesic efficacy of adding dexmedetomidine to local anesthetic in quadratus lumborum block and their role in reduction postoperative opioid consumption after cesarean section
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Adding Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to The Local Anesthetic in Quadratus Lumborum Block in Patient Undergoing Caesarean Section
NCT07072650
Dexmedetomidine in Obturator Nerve Block as an Analgesic in Transurethral Surgeries
NCT06229054
DEXMEDETOMIDINE in NORMAL VAGINAL DELIVERY
NCT05840328
Dexmedetomidine Added to Bupivacaine for ESP Block in Children Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgeries
NCT07023991
Bupivacaine With Dexmedetomidine Versus Bupivacaine Alone for Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Caesarean Section
NCT06292273
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All participants, investigators, care providers and outcome assessors will be blinded to the study group allocation.
The day Prior to surgery, all patients will have pre anesthesia check-up with routine and subjective investigations and explained about the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0-10 (0 indicating no pain and 10 for severe intractable pain) The patients will be pre medicated by 40mg oral pantoprazole at night and in the morning of the surgery.
On arrival to the operating room, patients will be monitored by peripheral pulse oximetry, five-lead electrocardiogram and non-invasive blood pressure monitor. Two 18-gauge intravenous cannulae will be inserted in the nondominant arm and 1500 ml crystalloid will be infused as acoload plus ephedrine infusion 4mg/min. to prevent post spinal hypotension.
Random allocation of patients into one of two groups using concealed closed envelope method, the patients' envelope which contain the number of group will be opened and recorded in the data collection sheet as a number of group because the data collector will be blinded to the intervention on the patient, only the anesthetist knows each number is referring to which intervention.
Spinal anesthesia will be performed with the patient in the sitting position at the level of L2 to 3 or L3 to 4 intervertebral spaces using a 25-gauge Quincke Bevel type needle (Spinocan®, Braun Melsungen AG,Germany) with 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine(AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, UK) and 25μ g of fentanyl. Patients will be placed in the supine position with left uterine displacement and a face-mask will be applied to deliver oxygen at rate of 6 L/minute.
Five minutes after spinal injection, Spinal anesthesia level will be assessed by loss of cold (ice cube) and touch (blunt pin) discrimination and will be considered successful if a bilateral sensory blockade to T4-T6 is established. Anesthesia and surgical management will be performed in the usual manner.
At the end of surgery, all patients will receive 1 gm of intravenous paracetamol. After the abdomen will be cleaned with surgical solution, covering the wound and while the patient is still fully monitored, the patient will be placed in the lateral decubitus position and the QLB will be performed.
A convex (5-8 MHz) ultrasound probe (Shenzhen Mindray BIO-Medical Electronics, Model: DP-20, China) with a protective sheath will be used after imaging depth and gain is adjusted. The procedure will be done under complete aseptic condition (facemask, gown, and gloves) after cleaning of the abdominal skin with antiseptic solution.
The probe will be placed in the mid axillary line cranially to the iliac crest to identify the three muscles of the anterior abdominal wall (transversus abdominis, internal oblique, and external oblique). Then, scan dorsally keeping the transverse orientation until observing that the transversus abdominus muscle became aponeurotic, and this aponeurosis will be followed until the QL muscle is clearly visualized with its attachment to the lateral edge of the transverse process of the L2 vertebral body and visualize the thoracolumbar fascia at the lateral edge of the QL muscle , followed by recognition of Shamrock pattern by viewing psoas major muscle (PM) anteriorly, the erector spinae muscle (ESM) posteriorly and the QL muscle adherent to the apex of the transverse process (trifoliate).
Stimuplex® A 21G 100-mm needle (B. BRAUN, Melsungen AG, Germany) will be inserted in plane under real time US guidance from anterolateral to posteromedial direction via the abdominal wall. Two milliliters of 0.9% saline will be injected to visualize the solution spread (hydro dissection) to determine the optimal point of injection over the lumbar interfacial triangle.
Group A will be injected with 20 ml of 0. 25% bupivacaine in each side. (14) Group B will be injected with 20 ml of 0. 25% bupivacaine in each side added to it dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg; (Precedex 100 μg/ml (Hospira, inc, lake forest, USA).
Patients will be transferred to the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) and discharged from PACU when fully conscious, hemodynamically stable and pain free.
All patients will receive IV paracetamol 1gm every 8 hours. As a rescue analgesic, IV morphine (0.05 mg/kg) will be given when Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) \> 3, maximum dose of morphine will be given 30 mg per day.
the following data will be recorded:
* Total morphine consumption at predetermined time intervals (4, 8, 12, and 24) hrs. after surgery
* Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0-10 (0 indicating no pain and 10 for severe intractable pain) will be recorded and compared at 4,8,12, and 24h after surgery.
* Incidence of post-operative complications as nausea, vomiting or abdominal distension will also be recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
group A (bupivacaine only)
Group A will be injected with 20 ml of 0. 25% bupivacaine in each side
Bupivacaine 0.25% Injectable Solution
a local anesthetic drug
group B (bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine)
Group B will be injected with 20 ml of 0. 25% bupivacaine in each side added to it dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg; (Precedex 100 μg/ml (Hospira, inc, lake forest, USA).
bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine
bupivacaine is a local anesthetic drug plus dexmedetomidine is a new generation highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor (α2-AR) agonist that is associated with sedative and analgesic sparing effects
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bupivacaine 0.25% Injectable Solution
a local anesthetic drug
bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine
bupivacaine is a local anesthetic drug plus dexmedetomidine is a new generation highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor (α2-AR) agonist that is associated with sedative and analgesic sparing effects
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Normal uncomplicated pregnancies (ASA II).
3. BMI 18.5 to 34.9 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
2. ASA III - IV patients.
3. Coagulation disorders.
4. Skin lesions or infection at site of proposed needle.
5. Known allergy to any of study drugs.
6. inability to comprehend or use the verbal rating pain scoring system
7. Difficulty in Ultrasonographic identification.
8. Opioid abuse.
9. BMI \> 35 Kg/m2.
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed Sayed elaraby
assistant lecturer of anesthesia,icuand pain management
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nesrine M. El-Refai, professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Cairo University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Medicine Cairo University
Cairo, , Egypt
Faculty of Medicine
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
1. Snell P, Hicks C. An exploratory study in the UK of the effectiveness of three different pain management regimens for post-cesarean section women. Midwifery. 2006; 22(3):249-61. 2. Betrán A, Ye J, Moller A, et al. The Increasing Trend in Cesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 2016;11(2) 3. Gadsden J, Hart S, Santos A. Post-cesarean delivery analgesia. Anesth Analg 2005; 101(5 Suppl): S62-S69. 4. Karlström A, Engström-Olofsson R, Norbergh K, et al. Postoperative pain after cesarean birth affects breastfeeding and infant care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2007; 36: 430-40. 5. Stephan B, Parsa F. Avoiding Opioids and Their Harmful Side Effects in the Postoperative Patient: Exogenous Opioids, Endogenous Endorphins, Wellness, Mood, and Their Relation to Postoperative Pain. Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health: a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health. 2016 Mar; 75(3):63-7. 6.Mieszkowski M, Zawadzka E, Tuyakov B, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Quadratus Lumborum Block type I using ropivacaine in postoperative analgesia after a cesarean section - a controlled clinical study. Ginekologia Polska 2018; 89: 89-96. 7. Blanco R, Ansari T, Girgis E. Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain after cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anesthesiol. 2015; 32: 812-8. 8. Blanco R, Ansari T, Riad W, et al. Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016; 41: 757-62. 9. Singh R, Kumar N, Jain A, et al. Addition of clonidine to bupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane block prolongs postoperative analgesia after cesarean section. J Anesthesiol ClinPharmacol 2016; 32:501-4. 10. Sarvesh B, Shivaramu B, Sharma K, et al. Addition of Dexmedetomidine to Ropivacaine in Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Potentiates Postoperative Analgesia among Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Patients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Essays Res. 2018; 12(4):809-813. 11.Kirksey M, Haskins S, Cheng J, et al. Local Anesthetic Peripheral Nerve Block Adjuvants for Prolongation of Analgesia: A Systematic Qualitative Review. PLoS One. 2015; 10(9). 12. Varshney A, Prabhu M, Periyadka B, et al. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with levobupivacaine versus levobupivacaine with dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia following cesarean delivery. J Anesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019; 35(2):161-164. 13- Qianchuang S, Shuyan L, Huiying u, et.al. Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthetics in Transversus Abdominis Plane Block. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Clin J Pain. 2019 Apr; 35(4): 375-384. 14. Carline L, McLeod G, Lamb C. A cadaver study comparing spread of dye and nerve involvement after three different quadratus lumborum blocks. Br J Anesth. 2016; 117(3):387-394. 15. Kılıç E, Bulut E. Quadratus Lumborum Block III for Postoperative Pain AfterPercutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Turk J Anesthesiol Reanim. 2018; 46(4):272-275.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MD-75-2020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.