Evaluation of the Analgesic Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Epidural Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgeries

NCT ID: NCT03463083

Last Updated: 2018-05-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-04

Study Completion Date

2018-05-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine if the epidural route provide an acceptable analgesia in spine surgeries and avoided the need for excessive IV analgesics. Also to determine whatever dexmedetomidine or fentanyl is more better neuroaxial adjuvant regarding providing early onset and prolonged analgesia and stable cardiorespiratory parameters

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Relieving post-operative pain of spine surgeries has become an indispensable component in anesthesiology. Various methods have been tried for the management of post-operative pain in spine surgeries out of which regional techniques are becoming most promising. The quality of regional anesthesia has been reported to improve with the addition of opioids (such as morphine, fentanyl, and sufentanil) and other drugs (such as dexmedetomidine, clonidine, magnesium sulfate, neostigmine, ketamine, and midazolam), but no drug to inhibit nociception is without associated adverse effects . α2 adrenergic agonists have both analgesic and sedative properties when used as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine is an S-enantiomer of medetomidine with a higher specificity for α2-adrenoreceptor (α2 : α1, 1620 : 1) compared to clonidine (α2 : α1, 220 : 1). It was first introduced into practical use as intravenous sedative after the approval of U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1999. Since then it has been investigated as the anxiolytic, sympatholytic, and analgesic properties related to α2-adrenoceptor binding, and it is now being used as a co-analgesic drug. As adjuvant, neuroaxial administration is the appropriate route to dexmedetomidine, because the analgesic effect of α2-agonists mostly occurs at spinal level, and dexmedetomidin's high lipophilicity facilitates rapid absorption into the cerebrospinal fluid and binding to the spinal cord α2-adrenoreceptor. regional-administeration of dexmedetomidine has been shown to exert potent antinociceptive effects in animals. To date, a few studies have reported on the effects of epidural dexmedetomidine combined with local anesthetics in humans. . Administration of an α2-agonist via an intrathecal or epidural route provides an analgesic effect in postoperative pain without severe sedation. This effect is due to the sparing of supraspinal CNS sites from excessive drug exposure, resulting in robust analgesia without heavy sedation . The adverse effects of dexmedetomidine include hypotension, hypertension, nausea, bradycardia, atrial fibrillation, and hypoxia. Fentanyl is one of the short-acting narcotic analgesics with potent morphine-like action . Neuroaxial administration of lipophilic opioids such as Fentanyl and sufentanyl tends to provide a rapid onset of analgesia. Their rapid clearance from cerebrospinal fluid may limit cephalic spread and the development of certain side effects such as delayed respiratory depression

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dexmedetomidine VS Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Epidural Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgeries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This double-blind, prospective, randomised clinically controlled study is designed to study the efficacy of epidural analgesia of dexmedetomidine and compare the analgesic effect of its epidural injection with bupivacaine versus fentanyl with bupivacaine in the post operative period of elective spine surgeries.

To determine if the epidural route provide an acceptable analgesia in spine surgeries and avoided the need for excessive IV analgesics. Also to determine whatever dexmedetomidine or fentanyl is more better neuroaxial adjuvant regarding providing early onset and prolonged analgesia and stable cardiorespiratory parameters.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers
An online randomization program (http://www.randomizer.org) will be used to generate random list and to allocate patients into the study groups. Random allocation numbers will be concealed in opaque closed envelops. The patient and investigator assessing study outcomes will all be blinded to the study groups allocation. The study drugs will be prepared by a separate investigator not involved in outcome assessment

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bupivacaine dexmedetomidine group

Group 1 (bupivacaine + dexmedetomidine (BD) group); will Receive an epidural study solution of 18 ml of 0.25% of bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 1 ml of dexmedetomidine (1 mcg/kg) plus 1 ml normal saline keeping the total volume of 20 ml in a syringe pump .

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

All cases of spine surgery will be done under G.A with the patient in prone position. After surgery an epidural catheter will be placed through a separate skin puncture above the incision The catheter will be positioned up to 7 cm from skin entry directing downwards in the epidural space . Once the patient in the post-operative room will be noted to have pain (VAS) of\>4, the study will start. A test dose of 3 ml lignocaine with adrenaline will be injected the following parameters will be noted .

1. The pain score, by using VAS
2. Onset of analgesia (fall of VAS\<4 ).
3. Peak level of analgesia ( VAS score 0).
4. Duration of analgesia (once the patient asks fwith VAS\>4).
5. Monitoring of NIBP, pulse rate, respiratory rate every 30 min.
6. Side-effects such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, Motor blockade "Bromage scale\>1" Also deep sedation "Ramsay sedation scale\>3" , And shivering and hypotension.

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

All cases of spine surgery will be done under G.A with the patient in prone position. After surgury an epidural catheter will be placed through a separate skin puncture above the incision The catheter will be positioned up to 7 cm from skin entry directing downwards in the epidural space . Once the patient in the post-operative room will be noted to have pain (VAS) of\>4, the study will start. A test dose of 3 ml lignocaine with adrenaline will be injected the following parameters will be noted .

1. The pain score, by using VAS
2. Onset of analgesia (fall of VAS\<4 ).
3. Peak level of analgesia ( VAS score 0).
4. Duration of analgesia (once the patient asks fwith VAS\>4).
5. Monitoring of NIBP, pulse rate, respiratory rate every 30 min.
6. Side-effects such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, Motor blockade "Bromage scale\>1" Also deep sedation "Ramsay sedation scale\>3" , And shivering and hypotension.

Bupivacaine fentanyl group

Group 2 (bupivacaine + fentanyl (BF) group) ; will Receive an epidural study solution of 18 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine plus 2 ml fentanyl (1 mcg/kg) keeping the total volume of 20 ml in a syringe pump .

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

All cases of spine surgery will be done under G.A with the patient in prone position. After surgury an epidural catheter will be placed through a separate skin puncture above the incision The catheter will be positioned up to 7 cm from skin entry directing downwards in the epidural space . Once the patient in the post-operative room will be noted to have pain (VAS) of\>4, the study will start. A test dose of 3 ml lignocaine with adrenaline will be injected the following parameters will be noted .

1. The pain score, by using VAS
2. Onset of analgesia (fall of VAS\<4 ).
3. Peak level of analgesia ( VAS score 0).
4. Duration of analgesia (once the patient asks fwith VAS\>4).
5. Monitoring of NIBP, pulse rate, respiratory rate every 30 min.
6. Side-effects such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, Motor blockade "Bromage scale\>1" Also deep sedation "Ramsay sedation scale\>3" , And shivering and hypotension.

Fentanyl

Intervention Type DRUG

All cases of spine surgery will be done under G.A with the patient in prone position. After surgury an epidural catheter will be placed through a separate skin puncture above the incision The catheter will be positioned up to 7 cm from skin entry directing downwards in the epidural space . Once the patient in the post-operative room will be noted to have pain (VAS) of\>4, the study will start. A test dose of 3 ml lignocaine with adrenaline will be injected the following parameters will be noted .

1. The pain score, by using VAS
2. Onset of analgesia (fall of VAS\<4 ).
3. Peak level of analgesia ( VAS score 0).
4. Duration of analgesia (once the patient asks fwith VAS\>4).
5. Monitoring of NIBP, pulse rate, respiratory rate every 30 min.
6. Side-effects such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, Motor blockade "Bromage scale\>1" Also deep sedation "Ramsay sedation scale\>3" , And shivering and hypotension.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexmedetomidine

All cases of spine surgery will be done under G.A with the patient in prone position. After surgery an epidural catheter will be placed through a separate skin puncture above the incision The catheter will be positioned up to 7 cm from skin entry directing downwards in the epidural space . Once the patient in the post-operative room will be noted to have pain (VAS) of\>4, the study will start. A test dose of 3 ml lignocaine with adrenaline will be injected the following parameters will be noted .

1. The pain score, by using VAS
2. Onset of analgesia (fall of VAS\<4 ).
3. Peak level of analgesia ( VAS score 0).
4. Duration of analgesia (once the patient asks fwith VAS\>4).
5. Monitoring of NIBP, pulse rate, respiratory rate every 30 min.
6. Side-effects such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, Motor blockade "Bromage scale\>1" Also deep sedation "Ramsay sedation scale\>3" , And shivering and hypotension.

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine

All cases of spine surgery will be done under G.A with the patient in prone position. After surgury an epidural catheter will be placed through a separate skin puncture above the incision The catheter will be positioned up to 7 cm from skin entry directing downwards in the epidural space . Once the patient in the post-operative room will be noted to have pain (VAS) of\>4, the study will start. A test dose of 3 ml lignocaine with adrenaline will be injected the following parameters will be noted .

1. The pain score, by using VAS
2. Onset of analgesia (fall of VAS\<4 ).
3. Peak level of analgesia ( VAS score 0).
4. Duration of analgesia (once the patient asks fwith VAS\>4).
5. Monitoring of NIBP, pulse rate, respiratory rate every 30 min.
6. Side-effects such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, Motor blockade "Bromage scale\>1" Also deep sedation "Ramsay sedation scale\>3" , And shivering and hypotension.

Intervention Type DRUG

Fentanyl

All cases of spine surgery will be done under G.A with the patient in prone position. After surgury an epidural catheter will be placed through a separate skin puncture above the incision The catheter will be positioned up to 7 cm from skin entry directing downwards in the epidural space . Once the patient in the post-operative room will be noted to have pain (VAS) of\>4, the study will start. A test dose of 3 ml lignocaine with adrenaline will be injected the following parameters will be noted .

1. The pain score, by using VAS
2. Onset of analgesia (fall of VAS\<4 ).
3. Peak level of analgesia ( VAS score 0).
4. Duration of analgesia (once the patient asks fwith VAS\>4).
5. Monitoring of NIBP, pulse rate, respiratory rate every 30 min.
6. Side-effects such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, Motor blockade "Bromage scale\>1" Also deep sedation "Ramsay sedation scale\>3" , And shivering and hypotension.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Dexmedetomidine bupivacaine versus fentanyl bupivacaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. All male patients between the age group of 18 and 65 years
2. Patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II.
3. Patients who will undergo lumbar spine surgeries (laminectomy ± discectomy for PIVD (Prolapse of intervertebral disc), will be enrolled for this study

Exclusion Criteria

1. All Patients below the age of 18 years and above 65 years. Also All female patient are excluded from the study.
2. Other spine surgeries rather than laminectomy, also surgeries on more than two levels.
3. Patients with haematological disease, bleeding or coagulation test abnormalities, psychiatric diseases.

4 .Patiensts with history of drug abuse, allergy to any study medication. . 4 .Patients with cervical and thoracic spine surgeries, tubercular spine , any permanent neurological disorders and vertebral deformeties such as scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.

5\. Pregnant and lactating patients .

Withdrawal criteria :

Accidental Dural puncture.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mohamed, Ahmed A., M.D.

INDIV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tarek Ahmed Radwan

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mohamed Mahmoud Mohamed

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

ismaiel saied hammad

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Abdalla

Assistant Professor of Anesthesia &I.C.U and Pain Clinic

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ahmed Abdalla Mohamed

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

N-115-2017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.