Caudal Block Versus Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Plus Ring Block for Pain Management of Different Surgical Techniques of Circumcision in Infants and Children
NCT ID: NCT05233683
Last Updated: 2022-02-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-31
2023-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Comparison of the Efficacy of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block and Penile Block in Circumcision Surgery
NCT07097844
Posthectomy in Pediatric Elective Surgery : a Comparison of Perioperative Analgesia Using Echo-guided Penile Block and Pudendal Block With neurostimuLation Technique
NCT07191938
Pudendal Block Versus Penian Block For Circumcision In Children
NCT03046290
Evaluating Pain Outcomes of Caudal vs Ilioinguinal Nerve Block in Children Undergoing Hernia Repair
NCT03041948
Comparison of Caudal Blockade and Dorsal Penile Nerve Block With and Without the Intravenous Administration of Dexamethasone for Analgesia After Paediatric Male Circumcision
NCT05598255
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are very few randomized controlled trials comparing these two methods of intra-OP and post-OP pain relief, for different surgical techniques of circumcision and there is a lack of well-conducted studies comparing the quality of analgesia, need for rescue analgesia in the early post-OP period, complications, and parental satisfaction comparing these blocks. Furthermore, there is a lot of contradiction in the literature regarding the duration of analgesia produced with these techniques.
Poorly treated postoperative pain leads to fatigue and metabolic, endocrine, and immunological changes can lead to prolonged convalescence following surgery and is traumatic to the pediatric patients and their parents. In this study, the investigators planned to compare the two most popular methods of pain relief during and after circumcision, along with parents' satisfaction.
This research will guide the anesthetists regarding the selection of appropriate techniques of intra-OP and post-OP analgesia and in light of intra and post-OP data; and parents' satisfaction.
In this prospective randomized study the investigators plan to compare the quality of intra and post OP analgesia and the duration of post-OP analgesia produced by CB and DPNB +RB, need of rescue analgesia with both of the techniques of surgery, intra-OP hemodynamic variations, residual motor block, and adverse effects and parents' satisfaction with both of the anesthesia and the surgical techniques.
Research Objectives:
To evaluate and compare the intra and post-OP pain relief under CB and DPNB plus RB in pediatric patients undergoing circumcision with different surgical techniques and assessment of parents' satisfaction
This study may guide the anesthetists for the selection of appropriate techniques of intra and post-OP analgesia and their complications for different surgical techniques of circumcision and also about parent's satisfaction with the anesthetic technique.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
* Group 1 will receive are caudal block (CB) and circumcision with Plastibell,
* Group 2 will receive CB and circumcision with conventional dissection method (CDM),
* Group 3 will receive dorsal penile block (DPNB) and ring block (RB) and circumcision with Plastibell, and
* Group 4 will receive DPNB+ RB and circumcision with CDM.
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Caudal block and circumcision with Plastibell,
Caudal block will be performed with 0.75ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine containing 1 mic/kg dexmedetomidine. Circumcision will be done using plastibell. Paracetamol suppository will also be inserted per rectum in the dose of 15 mg/kg before the start of surgery. The surgery will be started 10 minutes after block placement to allow adequate time for the block to be effective.
Caudal block
Caudal block will be performed in lateral position with 0.25% bupivacaine in the dose of 0.75 ml/kg containing 1 mic/kg dexmedetomidine. The patients will be turned back to the supine position after the block placement and the head of the patient will be placed in the neutral position. Paracetamol suppository will also be inserted per rectum in the dose of 15 mg/kg before the start of surgery. The surgery will be started 10 minutes after block placement to allow adequate time for the block to be effective.
Circumcision with Plastibell
Circumcision with Plastibell
Caudal block and circumcision with conventional dissection method
Caudal block will be performed with 0.75ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine containing 1 mic/kg dexmedetomidine. Circumcision will be done using the conventional dissection method. Paracetamol suppository will also be inserted per rectum in the dose of 15 mg/kg before the start of surgery. The surgery will be started 10 minutes after block placement to allow adequate time for the block to be effective.
Caudal block
Caudal block will be performed in lateral position with 0.25% bupivacaine in the dose of 0.75 ml/kg containing 1 mic/kg dexmedetomidine. The patients will be turned back to the supine position after the block placement and the head of the patient will be placed in the neutral position. Paracetamol suppository will also be inserted per rectum in the dose of 15 mg/kg before the start of surgery. The surgery will be started 10 minutes after block placement to allow adequate time for the block to be effective.
Conventional Dissection Method
Conventional Dissection Method
Dorsal penile nerve block plus ring block and circumcision with Plastibell
Dorsal penile nerve block plus ring block with 0.25% bupivacaine. Circumcision will be done using plastibell.
Dorsal penile nerve block plus ring block
It will be performed with the child in the supine position. Following skin preparation and palpation of the arch of the lower border of the symphysis pubis, the base of the penis will be gently pulled down, and a 25-G needle will be inserted at 10 and 2.0 "O" clock position to a depth of 0.25-0.5 cm (under Bucks' fascia) and 1 ml + 0.1ml X weight of the patient) of local anesthetic (0.25% bupivacaine) will be injected at each point after negative aspiration and then RB will be done in the form of a circumferential subcutaneous ring at the level of the base of the penis. Paracetamol suppository will also be inserted per rectum in the dose of 15 mg/kg before the start of surgery. The surgery will be started 10 minutes after block placement to allow adequate time for the block to be effective.
Circumcision with Plastibell
Circumcision with Plastibell
Dorsal penile nerve block plus ring block and circumcision with conventional dissection method
Dorsal penile nerve block plus ring block with 0.25% bupivacaine. Circumcision will be done using the conventional dissection method
Dorsal penile nerve block plus ring block
It will be performed with the child in the supine position. Following skin preparation and palpation of the arch of the lower border of the symphysis pubis, the base of the penis will be gently pulled down, and a 25-G needle will be inserted at 10 and 2.0 "O" clock position to a depth of 0.25-0.5 cm (under Bucks' fascia) and 1 ml + 0.1ml X weight of the patient) of local anesthetic (0.25% bupivacaine) will be injected at each point after negative aspiration and then RB will be done in the form of a circumferential subcutaneous ring at the level of the base of the penis. Paracetamol suppository will also be inserted per rectum in the dose of 15 mg/kg before the start of surgery. The surgery will be started 10 minutes after block placement to allow adequate time for the block to be effective.
Conventional Dissection Method
Conventional Dissection Method
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Caudal block
Caudal block will be performed in lateral position with 0.25% bupivacaine in the dose of 0.75 ml/kg containing 1 mic/kg dexmedetomidine. The patients will be turned back to the supine position after the block placement and the head of the patient will be placed in the neutral position. Paracetamol suppository will also be inserted per rectum in the dose of 15 mg/kg before the start of surgery. The surgery will be started 10 minutes after block placement to allow adequate time for the block to be effective.
Dorsal penile nerve block plus ring block
It will be performed with the child in the supine position. Following skin preparation and palpation of the arch of the lower border of the symphysis pubis, the base of the penis will be gently pulled down, and a 25-G needle will be inserted at 10 and 2.0 "O" clock position to a depth of 0.25-0.5 cm (under Bucks' fascia) and 1 ml + 0.1ml X weight of the patient) of local anesthetic (0.25% bupivacaine) will be injected at each point after negative aspiration and then RB will be done in the form of a circumferential subcutaneous ring at the level of the base of the penis. Paracetamol suppository will also be inserted per rectum in the dose of 15 mg/kg before the start of surgery. The surgery will be started 10 minutes after block placement to allow adequate time for the block to be effective.
Circumcision with Plastibell
Circumcision with Plastibell
Conventional Dissection Method
Conventional Dissection Method
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Male,
3. Ages 3 months to 4 years,
4. Scheduled for circumcision for various indications under GA.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with hypospadias, other penile or sacral anomalies
3. Patients weight \<3kg.
4. Allergy to Local Anesthetic
5. Infection at the site of block
6. Pre-existing spinal or neurological disease
7. Pain medication within the previous 48 hours
3 Months
4 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
King Saud University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mansoor Aqil
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mansoor Aqil, FCPS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
King Saud University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
King Saud University
Riyadh, , Saudi Arabia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rossi S, Buonocore G, Bellieni CV. Management of pain in newborn circumcision: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Jan;180(1):13-20. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03758-6. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
Bawazir OA. A controlled trial of Gomco versus Plastibell for neonatal circumcisions in Saudi Arabia. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2020 Sep;7(3):132-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
Jiang ZL, Sun CW, Sun J, Shi GF, Li H. Subcutaneous tissue-sparing dorsal slit with new marking technique: A novel circumcision method. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(16):e15322. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015322.
Weksler N, Atias I, Klein M, Rosenztsveig V, Ovadia L, Gurman GM. Is penile block better than caudal epidural block for postcircumcision analgesia? J Anesth. 2005;19(1):36-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-004-0287-8.
Soltany S, Ardestanizadeh A. The study of the factors affecting the time of ring fall off in circumcision using Plastibell. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Jun 30;9(6):2736-2740. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1261_19. eCollection 2020 Jun.
O'Sullivan MJ, Mislovic B, Alexander E. Dorsal penile nerve block for male pediatric circumcision--randomized comparison of ultrasound-guided vs anatomical landmark technique. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011 Dec;21(12):1214-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03722.x.
Wang X, Dong C, Beekoo D, Qian X, Li J, Shang-Guan WN, Jiang X. Dorsal Penile Nerve Block via Perineal Approach, an Alternative to a Caudal Block for Pediatric Circumcision: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 27;2019:6875756. doi: 10.1155/2019/6875756. eCollection 2019.
Teunkens A, Van de Velde M, Vermeulen K, Van Loon P, Bogaert G, Fieuws S, Rex S. Dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision in pediatric patients: A prospective, observer-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial for the comparison of ultrasound-guided vs landmark technique. Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Aug;28(8):703-709. doi: 10.1111/pan.13429. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
Heller GZ, Manuguerra M, Chow R. How to analyze the Visual Analogue Scale: Myths, truths and clinical relevance. Scand J Pain. 2016 Oct;13:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
Chan KH, Shah A, Moser EA, Szymanski K, Whittam BM, Misseri R, Kaefer M, Rink R, Cain MP. Comparison of Intraoperative and Early Postoperative Outcomes of Caudal vs Dorsal Penile Nerve Blocks for Outpatient Penile Surgeries. Urology. 2018 Aug;118:164-171. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.08.062. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
Panda A, Bajwa SJ, Sen S, Parmar SS. Penile block for paediatric urological surgery: A comparative evaluation with general anaesthesia. Indian J Urol. 2011 Oct;27(4):457-64. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.91432.
Sandeman DJ, Reiner D, Dilley AV, Bennett MH, Kelly KJ. A retrospective audit of three different regional anaesthetic techniques for circumcision in children. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 May;38(3):519-24. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1003800317.
Yao Y, Yu C, Zhang X, Guo Y, Zheng X. Caudal and intravenous dexmedetomidine similarly prolong the duration of caudal analgesia in children: A randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Oct;28(10):888-896. doi: 10.1111/pan.13469.
Sharara-Chami R, Lakissian Z, Charafeddine L, Milad N, El-Hout Y. Combination Analgesia for Neonatal Circumcision: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatrics. 2017 Dec;140(6):e20171935. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1935. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
Munevveroglu C, Gunduz M. Postoperative pain management for circumcision; Comparison of frequently used methods. Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Jan-Feb;36(2):91-95. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.2.505.
Cyna AM, Middleton P. Caudal epidural block versus other methods of postoperative pain relief for circumcision in boys. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD003005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003005.pub2.
Sinkey RG, Eschenbacher MA, Walsh PM, Doerger RG, Lambers DS, Sibai BM, Habli MA. The GoMo study: a randomized clinical trial assessing neonatal pain with Gomco vs Mogen clamp circumcision. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):664.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.029. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
Mehmood T, Azam H, Tariq M, Iqbal Z, Mehmood H, Shah SA. Plastibell Device Circumcision versus Bone Cutter Technique in terms of Operative Outcomes and Parent's Satisfaction. Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Mar-Apr;32(2):347-50. doi: 10.12669/pjms.322.9510.
Margetts L, Carr A, McFadyen G, Lambert A. A comparison of caudal bupivacaine and ketamine with penile block for paediatric circumcision. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Dec;25(12):1009-13. doi: 10.1017/S0265021508004833. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
Atasever AG, Ermis O, Demir BS, Kasali K, Karadeniz MS. Comparison of bupivacaine alone and in a combination with lidocaine for caudal block in patients undergoing circumcision: A historical cohort study. Turk J Urol. 2019 Nov 29;46(3):243-248. doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.19191. Print 2020 May.
Sottas CE, Anderson BJ. Dexmedetomidine: the new all-in-one drug in paediatric anaesthesia? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Aug;30(4):441-451. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000488.
Li S, Liu T, Xia J, Jia J, Li W. Effect of dexmedetomidine on prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in pediatric strabismus surgery: a randomized controlled study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 5;20(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01359-3.
Mahmoud M, Mason KP. Dexmedetomidine: review, update, and future considerations of paediatric perioperative and periprocedural applications and limitations. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Aug;115(2):171-82. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev226.
Bellon M, Le Bot A, Michelet D, Hilly J, Maesani M, Brasher C, Dahmani S. Efficacy of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Compared with Placebo for Postoperative Pain Management: A Meta-Analysis of Published Studies. Pain Ther. 2016 Jun;5(1):63-80. doi: 10.1007/s40122-016-0045-2. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
Mittino I, Sangalli M, Fabbri F, Sozzi F, Ghezzi M, Zanni G, Cestari A. Ischemia of the glans 24 hours after circumcision: A case report and therapeutic solution. Urologia. 2018 Nov;85(4):174-176. doi: 10.1177/0391560318761288. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
Ozen V, Yigit D. A comparison of the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of low dose caudal epidural block and US-guided dorsal penile nerve block with in-plane technique in circumcision. J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Feb;16(1):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
E-21-5965
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.