Intrathecal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine and Clonidine in Paediatrics Age Group:A Comparative Evaluation
NCT ID: NCT01661803
Last Updated: 2012-08-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-11-30
2012-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clonidine and Morphine in Caudal Anesthesia
NCT00672347
Age-Based and Weight-Based Bupivacaine Dosing for Pediatric Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Infra-Umbilical Surgeries
NCT06801600
Comparison of Low-dose Epidural With Intravenous Narcotic Versus Intravenous Narcotic Alone
NCT00287326
Pain Injection Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Hip Surgery in Pediatric Patients With Cerebral Palsy
NCT06189781
Neuroinflammatory and Neurocognitive Effects of Spinal vs. Inhalational Anesthesia for Elective Surgery in Infants
NCT02521831
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade I patients aged between 3-10 years were scheduled for the surgeries below T8 dermatome up to two hrs duration. The patients were randomly allocated in - Group A-who received 0.5%of hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.4mg/kg for 5 to15 kg or 0.3 mg/kg for more than 15 kg intrathecally.
Group B-who received 0.5%of hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.4mg/kg for 5 to15 kg or 0.3 mg/kg for more than 15 kg and 1µg/kg preservative free clonidine intrathecally.
The patients studied across the group did not vary much with respect to age, weight and sex distribution.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
group-A and group-B
Group-A (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.4 mg/kg for 5-15 kg or 0.3mg/kg for \>15kg) and Group-B (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.4 mg/kg for 5-15 kg or 0.3mg/kg for \>15 with 1 mcg/kg preservative free clonidine).
No interventions assigned to this group
group-A and group--B
Group-A (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.4 mg/kg for 5-15 kg or 0.3mg/kg for \>15kg) and Group-B (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.4 mg/kg for 5-15 kg or 0.3mg/kg for \>15 with 1 mcg/kg preservative free clonidine).
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. weight 5-35kg
3. age-3 to 10 yrs
Exclusion Criteria
2. gross spinal deformity
3. patients in whom regional anesthesia is contraindicated.
4. patients with peripheral neuropathy.
5. patient with hemodynamic instability.
3 Years
10 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ACPM Medical College
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
DR.NAGESH JAMBURE
resident,anesthesia department,a.c.p.m.medical college,dhule,maharashtra,india
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
acpm anesthesia.dhule.
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.