Preservation Vs. Dissection of No. 253 Lymph Nodes of Robotic Resection for Mid/Low Rectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT06956976
Last Updated: 2025-05-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
1596 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-06-01
2031-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Mid/Low Rectal Cancer
NCT02817126
A Trial of Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection for Treating Low Rectal Cancer
NCT01985698
Single-port Robotic Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision
NCT06591572
Robotic Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery Compared to Robotic Assisted Surgery for Median Rectal Cancer
NCT06454201
Short Term Outcomes of Robotic-assisted Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer
NCT03597126
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Does preserving IMA-LN achieve non-inferior 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) compared to IMA-LN dissection?
2. Does preserving IMA-LN reduce postoperative complications (e.g., anastomotic leakage, urinary/defecation dysfunction) and improve quality of life?
Researchers will compare two surgical strategies:
1. IMA-LN preservation group: No dissection of IMA root lymph nodes, with ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) distal to the left colic artery.
2. IMA-LN dissection group: Complete dissection of IMA root lymph nodes, with high or low ligation of the IMA.
Both groups will undergo robotic surgery following total mesorectal excision (TME) principles.
Participants will:
1. Be randomly assigned to either the preservation or dissection group. Receive standardized preoperative evaluations (imaging, biopsies) and postoperative follow-up for 3 years.
2. Undergo regular clinical assessments, including tumor marker tests, imaging (CT/MRI), colonoscopy, and quality-of-life questionnaires (evaluating urinary/sexual/defecation function).
3. Have surgical outcomes (e.g., complications, lymph node counts) and survival data recorded.
The trial aims to provide high-level evidence for optimizing surgical strategies in mid/low rectal cancer treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
IMA-LN Preservation
Patients underwent robotic radical resection for rectal cancer, adhering to the principles of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) or Tumor-Specific Mesorectal Excision (TSME), but preserving the lymph nodes at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA).
Preservation of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Root Lymph Node
Patients underwent robotic radical resection for rectal cancer, adhering to the principles of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) or Tumor-Specific Mesorectal Excision (TSME), but preserving the lymph nodes at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA).
IMA-LN Dissection
Patients underwent robotic radical resection for rectal cancer, adhering to the principles of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) or Tumor-Specific Mesorectal Excision (TSME), and dissecting the lymph nodes at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA).
Dissection of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Root Lymph Node
Patients underwent robotic radical resection for rectal cancer, adhering to the principles of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) or Tumor-Specific Mesorectal Excision (TSME), and dissecting the lymph nodes at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dissection of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Root Lymph Node
Patients underwent robotic radical resection for rectal cancer, adhering to the principles of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) or Tumor-Specific Mesorectal Excision (TSME), and dissecting the lymph nodes at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA).
Preservation of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Root Lymph Node
Patients underwent robotic radical resection for rectal cancer, adhering to the principles of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) or Tumor-Specific Mesorectal Excision (TSME), but preserving the lymph nodes at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma by colonoscopic biopsy
3. Tumor located ≤10 cm from the anal verge
4. No metastasis at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and no lateral lymph node metastasis confirmed by pelvic ultrasound, contrast-enhanced CT, and/or PET-CT (diagnostic criteria per the 2024 Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology \[CSCO\] Guidelines)
5. No distant metastasis (including pelvic, peritoneal, hepatic, pulmonary, cerebral, skeletal, or distant lymph node metastasis) confirmed by imaging
6. Pelvic MRI and/or transrectal ultrasound confirming cT1-T3 N0-1 stage, or ycT1-T3 Nx after neoadjuvant therapy (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy)
7. No history of other malignancies (except adequately treated basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ)
8. Suitable for robotic surgery
9. Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. cT1N0 tumors suitable for local excision
3. Emergency surgery required due to acute bowel obstruction, hemorrhage, or perforation
4. Multiple primary colorectal malignancies
5. Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Lynch syndrome, or inflammatory bowel disease
6. Concomitant conditions requiring concurrent colonic resection
7. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade \>III
8. Pregnancy or lactation
9. Preoperative short-course radiotherapy
10. Inability of the patient/family to comprehend the study protocol
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fudan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Xu jianmin
Chair of Colorectal Surgery Department
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jianmin Xu, Prof.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Fudan University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REAL2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.