Single-port Robotic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

NCT ID: NCT07237126

Last Updated: 2025-11-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-11-20

Study Completion Date

2027-11-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a single-center, phase 2a exploratory clinical study based on IDEAL framework. The intraoperative and postoperative complications were analyzed to evaluate the safety, feasibility and clinical efficacy of single-port robot-assisted gastric tumor resection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study assessed the intraoperative adverse events (device-related and/or procedure-related), postoperative complications, perioperative recovery outcomes, surgical specimen quality, and pathological indices of Single-port robot-assisted radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single-port Robotic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Single-port Robotic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Single-port Robotic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Single-port Robotic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Single-port Robotic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Single-port Robotic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* (1) Age: 18-75 years; (2) Histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma by endoscopic biopsy; (3) Preoperatively staged as either endoscopically unresectable T1, or cT2-4a with or without nodal involvement (N-/+), and no distant metastasis (M0), according to the 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual; (4) Eligible for potentially curative surgical resection; (5) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0-1; (6) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I-III; (7) Provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* (1) Pregnant or lactating women; (2) Severe psychiatric disorder; (3) History of prior upper abdominal surgery; (4) Previous gastrectomy, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR); (5) Preoperative imaging showing regional lymphadenopathy with lymph node(s) larger than 3 cm in diameter; (6) History of another primary malignancy within the past 5 years; (7) Prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy; (8) History of cerebrovascular or cardiovascular event (e.g., stroke or myocardial infarction) within the past 6 months; (9) Systemic corticosteroid use for more than one month within the past month; (10) Requirement for concomitant surgery for other conditions; (11) Need for emergency surgery due to gastric cancer-related complications (e.g., bleeding, obstruction, or perforation); (12) Participation in another interventional clinical trial previously; (13) Active severe infectious disease; (14) Severe systemic disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Daping Hospital

Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Fan Li MD

Role: CONTACT

0008602368757350

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Chuan Huang

Role: primary

86-13140290998

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ito A, Nakauchi M, Fujita M, Umeki Y, Suzuki K, Serizawa A, Akimoto S, Watanabe Y, Tanaka T, Shibasaki S, Inaba K, Uyama I, Suda K. Initial clinical experiences of robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the Da Vinci SP system: a single-center retrospective study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Mar 29;410(1):110. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03685-w.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 40156763 (View on PubMed)

Park SH, Kim YN, Hwang J, Kim KY, Cho M, Kim YM, Hyung WJ, Kim HI. Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial using the da Vinci Single Port(SP) robotic system. Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 30;13(1):18578. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45655-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37903856 (View on PubMed)

Shang L, Zhang R, Dong K, Xiao K, Zheng C, Shi Y, Liu H, Jing C, Li L. The world's first pure single-port robotic radical total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Dec 20;137(24):3151-3152. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003380. Epub 2024 Nov 28. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39604102 (View on PubMed)

Qiu WW, Huang ZN, Li TY, Zhang L, She JJ, Jia BQ, Qin XG, Ren SY, Yao HL, Liu DN, Liang H, Shi FY, Li P, Li BP, Zhang XS, Liu KJ, Zheng CH, Lin JX, Huang CM, Li P. Comparison of short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy in high-risk patients with gastric cancer: a nationwide, multicentre cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025 Oct;51(10):110294. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110294. Epub 2025 Jul 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 40651456 (View on PubMed)

Keller DS, Reif de Paula T, Ikner TP, Saidi H, Schoonyoung H, H Marks J. Perioperative outcomes for single-port robotic versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a comparative analysis in colorectal cancer surgery. Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1568-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10629-2. Epub 2024 Jan 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38177611 (View on PubMed)

Cheng X, Huang C, Jia W, Guo Z, Shi Y, Song Z, Feng H, Huang H, Xu S, Li H, Wang S, Zhang Y, Zhang T, Liu K, Ji X, Zhao R. Clinical status and future prospects of single-incision robotic-assisted surgery: a review. Int J Surg. 2023 Dec 1;109(12):4221-4237. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000944.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37988410 (View on PubMed)

Cianchi F, Staderini F, Badii B. Single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: state of art. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 May 28;20(20):6073-80. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6073.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24876729 (View on PubMed)

Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Di Franco F, Harris AM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus conventional multiport appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 2013 Dec;100(13):1709-18. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9296.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24227355 (View on PubMed)

Haueter R, Schutz T, Raptis DA, Clavien PA, Zuber M. Meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis. Br J Surg. 2017 Aug;104(9):1141-1159. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10574. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28569406 (View on PubMed)

Seo HS, Lee HH. Is the 5-ports approach necessary in laparoscopic gastrectomy? Feasibility of reduced-port totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study. Int J Surg. 2016 May;29:118-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.03.035. Epub 2016 Mar 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27034118 (View on PubMed)

Liu Y, Yun H, Zhang W, Zou H, Chen N, Wang Y, Luo Z, Xu X, Sun Y, Chen Y, Beznosenko A, ALMasri H, McClure MA, Ma H, Yu J, Lv Q. Robotic versus laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Int J Surg. 2025 Sep 1;111(9):6397-6411. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002761. Epub 2025 Jun 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 40549444 (View on PubMed)

Li Z, Zhou W, Yang W, Miao Y, Zhang Y, Duan L, Niu L, Chen J, Fan A, Xie Q, Wei S, Bai H, Wang C, Chen X, Han Y, Hong L. Efficacy and safety of robotic vs. laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8045-8056. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001826.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38874467 (View on PubMed)

Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J. Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1569-1580. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7219.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29067426 (View on PubMed)

Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Hyung WJ; Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Effect of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-term Survival Among Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;5(4):506-513. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6727.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30730546 (View on PubMed)

Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Morita S, Yamada T, Bando E, Ito S, Takagi M, Takagane A, Teshima S, Koeda K, Nunobe S, Yoshikawa T, Terashima M, Sasako M. Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Feb;5(2):142-151. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30332-2. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31757656 (View on PubMed)

Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Park YK, Lee HJ, An JY, Kim W, Kim HI, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Hur H, Kim MC, Kong SH, Cho GS, Kim JJ, Park DJ, Ryu KW, Kim YW, Kim JW, Lee JH, Han SU; Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study Group. Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-02-RCT Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 1;38(28):3304-3313. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01210. Epub 2020 Aug 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32816629 (View on PubMed)

Wang FH, Zhang XT, Tang L, Wu Q, Cai MY, Li YF, Qu XJ, Qiu H, Zhang YJ, Ying JE, Zhang J, Sun LY, Lin RB, Wang C, Liu H, Qiu MZ, Guan WL, Rao SX, Ji JF, Xin Y, Sheng WQ, Xu HM, Zhou ZW, Zhou AP, Jin J, Yuan XL, Bi F, Liu TS, Liang H, Zhang YQ, Li GX, Liang J, Liu BR, Shen L, Li J, Xu RH. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2023. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2024 Jan;44(1):127-172. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12516. Epub 2023 Dec 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38160327 (View on PubMed)

Sun D, Mulder DT, Li Y, Nieboer D, Park JY, Suh M, Hamashima C, Han W, O'Mahony JF, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. The Effect of Nationwide Organized Cancer Screening Programs on Gastric Cancer Mortality: A Synthetic Control Study. Gastroenterology. 2024 Mar;166(3):503-514. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.11.286. Epub 2023 Nov 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38007053 (View on PubMed)

Chen Y, Jia K, Xie Y, Yuan J, Liu D, Jiang L, Peng H, Zhong J, Li J, Zhang X, Shen L. The current landscape of gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction cancer diagnosis and treatment in China: a comprehensive nationwide cohort analysis. J Hematol Oncol. 2025 Apr 15;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13045-025-01698-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 40234884 (View on PubMed)

Yang WJ, Zhao HP, Yu Y, Wang JH, Guo L, Liu JY, Pu J, Lv J. Updates on global epidemiology, risk and prognostic factors of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 28;29(16):2452-2468. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i16.2452.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37179585 (View on PubMed)

Park JY, Georges D, Alberts CJ, Bray F, Clifford G, Baussano I. Global lifetime estimates of expected and preventable gastric cancers across 185 countries. Nat Med. 2025 Sep;31(9):3020-3027. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03793-6. Epub 2025 Jul 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 40624406 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SPORTS-04

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.