the Clinical Efficacy of Robotic and Laparoscopic Radical Total Gastrectomy in Locally Advanced Middle and Upper Gastric Cancer

NCT ID: NCT05235932

Last Updated: 2022-02-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

570 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-20

Study Completion Date

2027-02-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the clinical efficacy (safety, feasibility and long-term efficacy) of robotic radical total gastrectomy and laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy in patients with locally advanced middle and upper gastric adenocarcinoma (CT2-4A, N-/+, M0) .

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the field of gastrectomy, Hashizume et al. first reported robotic gastrectomy in 2002. Since then, reports on the safety and feasibility of the application of robotic surgical system in the treatment of gastric cancer (GC) have gradually increased. Reports of robotic surgery for GC are increasing, especially in Asia. Several studies confirmed the advantages of robotic gastrectomy when compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy. However, whether robotic radical total gastrectomy is noninferior to laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy remains unclear. The investigator first carried out this study in the world to evaluate the efficacy of robotic radical total gastrectomy versus laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy for GC.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastric Cancer Robotic Gastrectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Robotic radical total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy

After exploration and randomization, patients received robotic radical total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Robotic radical total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Most surgical procedures are performed using the robot system.

Laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy

After exploration and randomization, patients received laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Without the robot system, Most surgical procedures are performed using laparoscopic equipment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robotic radical total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy

Most surgical procedures are performed using the robot system.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy

Without the robot system, Most surgical procedures are performed using laparoscopic equipment.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1.Age between 18 and 75 years 2.The primary gastric lesion was histopathologically diagnosed as middle and upper gastric adenocarcinoma (papillary adenocarcinoma PAP, tubular adenocarcinoma TUB, mucinous adenocarcinoma MUC, signed-ring cell carcinoma SIG, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma POR) by endoscopic biopsy.

3.Preoperative clinical stages were CT2-4A、 N-/+、and M0 (according to AJCC-8th TNM tumor staging) 4.Excepting to perform radical total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection can achieve R0 resection.

5.American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score class I, II, or III 6.Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Preoperative examination suggested disease staging cT1, N-/+, and M0 (according to AJCC-8th TNM tumor staging )
2. Women during pregnancy or breast-feeding
3. Severe mental disorder
4. History of previous upper abdominal surgery (except laparoscopic cholecystectomy)
5. History of previous gastrectomy(except for ESD/EMR for gastric cancer )
6. Enlarged or bulky regional lymph node over 3 cm by preoperative imaging
7. History of other malignant disease within the past five years
8. History of previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy
9. History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within past six months
10. History of cerebrovascular accident within past six months
11. History of continuous systematic administration of corticosteroids within one month
12. Requirement for simultaneous surgery for other disease(except laparoscopic cholecystectomy)
13. Emergency surgery due to complication (bleeding, obstruction or perforation) caused by gastric cancer
14. FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second)\<50% of predicted values
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese PLA General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lanzhou Military Region General Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gansu Provincial Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Southwest Hospital, China

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hebei Medical University Fourth Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fujian Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Chang-Ming Huang, Prof.

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chang-ming Huang, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Chang-ming Huang, MD

Role: CONTACT

+86-13805069676

Hua-long Zheng, MD

Role: CONTACT

+86-18359190587

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

RATME Vs LATME in Middle and Low Rectal Cancer
NCT06105203 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Bioinformation Therapy for Gastric Cancer
NCT03350477 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3