RATME Vs LATME in Middle and Low Rectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT06105203

Last Updated: 2025-02-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1026 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-11-01

Study Completion Date

2031-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multicenter, superior, randomized controlled trial designed to compare Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (RATME) and laparoscopic-assisted total mesorectal excision (LATME) for middle and low rectal cancer. The primary endpoint is the incidence of intersphincteric resection (ISR). The secondary outcomes are coloanal anastomosis (CAA), conversion to open, conversion to transanal TME (TaTME), incidence of abdominoperineal resection (APR), postoperative morbidity and mortality within 30 days after surgery, pathological outcomes, long-term survival outcomes, functional outcomes, and quality of life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (RATME) has been gradually applied by colorectal surgeons. Most surgeons consider RATME a safe method and believe it can facilitate total mesorectal excision (TME) in rectal cancer, especially middle and low rectal cancer with a narrow pelvis. Therefore, this trial investigates whether RATME has technical advantages and increase intersphincteric resection rate compared with laparoscopic-assisted TME (LATME) in middle and low rectal cancer.

This is a multicenter, superior, randomized controlled trial designed to compare RATME and LATME for middle and low rectal cancer. The primary endpoint is the incidence of intersphincteric resection (ISR). The secondary outcomes are coloanal anastomosis (CAA), conversion to open, conversion to transanal TME (TaTME), incidence of abdominoperineal resection (APR), postoperative morbidity and mortality within 30 days after surgery, pathological outcomes, long-term survival outcomes, functional outcomes, and quality of life. In addition, certain measures will be conducted to ensure quality and safety, including centralized photography review and semiannual assessment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Total Mesorectal Excision Rectal Neoplasms Robotic Surgical Procedures Laparoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RATME

In RaTME groups, the low anterior resection and TME was finished with the assistance of robot (da Vinci Xi surgical system)

Group Type OTHER

Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TME will be performed with the assistance of robot in rectal cancer

LATME

In LaTME groups, the low anterior resection and mesorectal excision procedures was completed under laparoscopy.

Group Type OTHER

laparoscopic-assisted total mesorectal excision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TME will be performed with the assistance of laparoscopy in rectal cancer

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision

TME will be performed with the assistance of robot in rectal cancer

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

laparoscopic-assisted total mesorectal excision

TME will be performed with the assistance of laparoscopy in rectal cancer

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. male patients diagnosed with rectal cancer by pathological biopsy;
2. abdominal contrast-enhanced and chest computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) revealed no distal metastasis;
3. Preoperative rectal magnetic resistance (MR) evaluation showed that the tumor was located at or below the peritoneal reflux plane, and at least 1cm above the anal sphincter groove, and did not invade the external anal sphincter;
4. Tumors located above the hiatus of levator ani muscle were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging as cT1-3, cN0-1, M0, and MRF (-); The tumors located below the hiatus of levator ani muscle were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging as cT1-2, cN0-1, M0, and MRF (-). After neoadjuvant treatment, the tumor above the hiatus of levator ani muscle is ycT3NxM0 or below; The tumor below the hiatus of levator ani muscle is ycT2NxM0;
5. The patient underwent laparoscopic assisted TME surgery or robotic assisted TME surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

1. multiple primary cancers;
2. history of open surgery;
3. no preoperative MR evaluation and inadequate evaluation of tumor stage;
4. Patients with rectal cancer who undergo endoscopic resection first and need subsequent transabdominal resection;
5. Pregnant or patients with concomitant inflammatory bowel disease;
6. Patients with preoperative complete bowel obstruction or requiring emergency surgery;
7. Preoperative evaluation indicates that patient may require combined organ resection;
8. Recently receiving treatment for other malignant tumors;
9. Bordeaux type IV low rectal cancer;
10. The preoperative pathological types are signet ring cell carcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, or poorly differentiated carcinoma.

Exit Criteria

1. Refuse surgical treatment after randomization;
2. Open surgery was performed for treatment after randomization;
3. Patients request to withdraw from the study at any time during the entire study process after randomization
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jilin Provincial Tumor Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The First Hospital of Jilin University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Quan Wang

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Quan Wang, Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

The First Hospital of Jilin University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The First Hospital of Jilin University

Changchun, Jilin, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yuchen Guo, Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

+8613630598312

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yuchen Guo, Ph.D.

Role: primary

+8613630598312

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Guo Y, He L, Tong W, Chi Z, Ren S, Cui B, Wang Q. A study of intersphincteric resection rate following robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic-assisted total mesorectal excision for patients with middle and low rectal cancer: study protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2024 Oct 21;25(1):703. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08561-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39434171 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STARS-RC05

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.