Safety and Efficacy Study of Single-port Robotic Versus Multi-port Robotic Radical Rectal Cancer Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06943690

Last Updated: 2025-04-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

212 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-31

Study Completion Date

2027-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of single-port robotic surgery compared to multi-port robotic surgery for rectal cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Surgical robots were born in the 1980s and have the advantages of being precise, flexible, less invasive and remotely operable than traditional surgical methods. The single-port robot is a further extension of minimally invasive surgery by placing multiple instruments through a single incision. Most studies have reported on the perioperative outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer. However, there are limited data comparing the perioperative outcomes of single-port robotics and multi-port robotics in the treatment of colorectal cancer,especially in rectal cancer surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of single-port robotic surgery compared to multi-port robotic surgery for rectal cancer.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rectal Cancer Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single-Port Robotic Surgery

Patients with rectal cancer undergo single-port robotic surgery.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Single-port robotic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In this group, patients will be operated using a single-port surgical robot system. In the single-port configuration, a four-channel trocar shall be used. The surgical tools are steered through the curved access channels in the trocar to enter a patient's abdomen. The surgical procedure followed the principle of total mesorectal excision.

Multi-Port Robotic Surgery

Patients with rectal cancer undergo multi-port robotic surgery.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Multi-port robotic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In this group, patients will be operated using a multi-port surgical robot system. Surgical instruments enter the abdominal cavity through 4 separate trocars. The surgical procedure followed the principle of total mesorectal excision.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Single-port robotic surgery

In this group, patients will be operated using a single-port surgical robot system. In the single-port configuration, a four-channel trocar shall be used. The surgical tools are steered through the curved access channels in the trocar to enter a patient's abdomen. The surgical procedure followed the principle of total mesorectal excision.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Multi-port robotic surgery

In this group, patients will be operated using a multi-port surgical robot system. Surgical instruments enter the abdominal cavity through 4 separate trocars. The surgical procedure followed the principle of total mesorectal excision.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SPRS MPRS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years \< age ≤80 years
* Tumor located in the mid to high rectum (lower edge of tumor ≥ 5 cm from anal verge)
* Pathological rectal carcinoma
* Clinically diagnosed c/ycT1-3N0-1M0 lesions according to the 8th Edition of AJCC Cancer Staging Manual
* Tumor size of 10 cm or less
* No history of other malignant tumors
* ECOG score is 0-1
* ASA score is Ⅰ-Ⅲ
* Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Body mass index (BMI) \>35 kg/m2
* Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)
* Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
* Multiple malignant colorectal tumors
* Pregnant woman or lactating woman
* Severe mental disease
* Previous gastrointestinal surgery (except appendectomy )
* Combination of intestinal obstruction, bleeding, perforation requiring emergency surgery
* Requirement of simultaneous surgery for other disease
* Serious disorders of liver and kidney function, coagulation function, or severe underlying diseases that cannot tolerate the surgery.
* Patients or family members who cannot understand the study program.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shandong Provincial Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ruijin Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zhao Ren

Chief Physicion

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ren Zhao, MD, PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ruijin Hospitlal , Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

Leping Li, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Shandong Provincial Hospital

Xian Shen, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

Jingming Zhai, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science & Technology

Luoyang, Henan, China

Site Status

Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University

Jinan, Shandong, China

Site Status

Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ren Zhao, MD, PHD

Role: CONTACT

+8618917762018

Kun Liu, MD

Role: CONTACT

+8618121263082

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jingming Zhai, MD

Role: primary

Leping Li, MD

Role: primary

Kun Liu, MD

Role: primary

+8618121263082

Xian Shen, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Guo Z, Shi Y, Song Z, Jia W, Wang S, Zhang Y, Ji X, Liu K, Zhang T, Cheng X, Zhao R. Single-incision robotic assisted surgery: a nonrandomized cohort pilot study on a novel surgical platform in colorectal surgery. Int J Surg. 2023 Nov 1;109(11):3417-3429. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000612.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37526117 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RASILS-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.