General Versus Regional Anesthesia in Peripheral Arterial Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06953128

Last Updated: 2025-06-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

594 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-01

Study Completion Date

2028-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effects of spinal (neuraxial) anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation versus general anesthesia with mechanical ventilation on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in adult patients undergoing elective lower limb revascularization surgery. A total of 594 patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease will be randomly assigned to receive either spinal anesthesia with sedation or general anesthesia with mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome is the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications within 30 days or until hospital discharge, including pneumonia, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, atelectasis, and other defined respiratory events. Secondary outcomes include cardiovascular events, hemodynamic instability, renal injury, delirium, extrapulmonary complications, adverse events in the operated limb, ICU and hospital length of stay, and mortality. The study will be conducted at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, and other participating Brazilian centers, with an expected start date in July 2025 and completion in December 2029.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial designed to evaluate the impact of the anesthetic technique-general anesthesia with mechanical ventilation versus spinal (neuraxial) anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation-on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing elective peripheral arterial revascularization surgery. The study population will include 594 adult patients (ASA II-IV) with symptomatic critical limb ischemia, scheduled for elective lower limb revascularization at tertiary hospitals in Brazil. Patients will be randomized into two groups: Group 1 will receive spinal anesthesia with intravenous sedation and supplemental nasal oxygen; Group 2 will receive general anesthesia with controlled mechanical ventilation using lung-protective strategies (tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg and PEEP 5 cmH₂O).

The primary outcome is the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications within 30 days after surgery or until hospital discharge. These include pneumonia, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, atelectasis, pneumothorax, aspiration pneumonitis, bronchospasm, ARDS, pulmonary embolism, and exacerbation of preexisting respiratory disease, defined according to internationally recognized criteria.

Secondary outcomes include:

1. major cardiovascular complications (nonfatal myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, cardiogenic shock);
2. hemodynamic complications (prolonged hypotension or distributive shock requiring vasopressors);
3. other extrapulmonary complications such as acute kidney injury, stroke, delirium, sepsis, surgical limb complications (e.g., graft thrombosis, amputation), and thromboembolic events (e.g., DVT, PE);
4. ICU and hospital length of stay, PACU time, and 30-day or in-hospital mortality.

Data collection will include perioperative gasometric evaluation, detailed intraoperative hemodynamic and ventilatory monitoring, analgesia and antiemetic usage, and adverse events tracking through predefined time points (intraoperative, immediate postoperative, and up to 30 days after surgery). Sample size calculation is based on detecting a reduction in pulmonary complications from 25% in the general anesthesia group to 15% in the spinal anesthesia group, with a power of 80% and a two-tailed alpha of 0.05. Randomization will be performed using computer-generated block sequences, and outcome assessors and statisticians will be blinded. The statistical analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle and include regression modeling to control for potential confounders such as comorbidities and operative duration.

The study will begin in July 2025 and is expected to be completed by December 2029. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and used to inform perioperative management strategies in vascular surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Complications Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Study Model Interventional (Clinical Trial) Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Prevention This model reflects the trial's aim to compare two standard anesthetic strategies in parallel groups to determine which is more effective in preventing postoperative pulmonary complications after peripheral arterial revascularization.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
Single-blinded (Outcomes Assessor)

Participants and anesthesiologists will not be blinded due to the nature of the interventions (general vs. spinal anesthesia).

However, postoperative outcome assessors and statisticians performing data analysis will be blinded to group allocation to reduce detection and assessment bias.

Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated block sequence and managed via the REDCap platform. Allocation concealment will be maintained using sealed envelopes.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Spinal Anesthesia

Patients in this group will receive spinal (neuraxial) anesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine (15-20 mg) and intrathecal morphine (100 μg), with optional clonidine as an adjuvant. Sedation may be provided with intravenous midazolam, fentanyl, and/or propofol, as per anesthesiologist discretion. Supplemental oxygen will be administered via nasal cannula. Patients will breathe spontaneously and will not be mechanically ventilated.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Spinal Anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants will receive subarachnoid (spinal) anesthesia with 15-20 mg of isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% and 100 μg of intrathecal morphine. Clonidine (1 μg/kg) may be added at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. Sedation will be achieved with intravenous midazolam (up to 5 mg), fentanyl (up to 100 μg), and/or target-controlled infusion of propofol. Patients will remain spontaneously breathing throughout the procedure and receive supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula.

General Anesthesia

Patients in this group will receive general anesthesia with intravenous induction (propofol or etomidate), opioids (remifentanil), and neuromuscular blockade (rocuronium), followed by endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation using a protective strategy (tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight and PEEP 5 cmH₂O). Anesthesia maintenance will include inhaled sevoflurane and continuous opioid infusion.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

General Anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants will undergo general anesthesia induced with intravenous propofol (1.5-2.5 mg/kg) or etomidate (0.2-0.3 mg/kg), remifentanil (0.2-0.4 μg/kg/min), and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg), followed by endotracheal intubation and controlled mechanical ventilation. Maintenance will include continuous remifentanil infusion and inhaled sevoflurane. Ventilation parameters will follow a protective strategy (tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight and PEEP of 5 cmH₂O).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spinal Anesthesia

Participants will receive subarachnoid (spinal) anesthesia with 15-20 mg of isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% and 100 μg of intrathecal morphine. Clonidine (1 μg/kg) may be added at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. Sedation will be achieved with intravenous midazolam (up to 5 mg), fentanyl (up to 100 μg), and/or target-controlled infusion of propofol. Patients will remain spontaneously breathing throughout the procedure and receive supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

General Anesthesia

Participants will undergo general anesthesia induced with intravenous propofol (1.5-2.5 mg/kg) or etomidate (0.2-0.3 mg/kg), remifentanil (0.2-0.4 μg/kg/min), and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg), followed by endotracheal intubation and controlled mechanical ventilation. Maintenance will include continuous remifentanil infusion and inhaled sevoflurane. Ventilation parameters will follow a protective strategy (tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight and PEEP of 5 cmH₂O).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults aged ≥18 years
* ASA physical status II to IV
* Scheduled for elective peripheral arterial revascularization of the lower limbs
* Diagnosis of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease with critical limb ischemia
* Able and willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Body mass index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m²
* Emergency vascular surgery
* History of lung resection surgery
* Persistent hemodynamic instability preoperatively
* History of bronchial asthma or chronic corticosteroid therapy
* History of neuromuscular disorders
* Current use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents contraindicating spinal anesthesia
* Contraindications to spinal anesthesia (e.g., patient refusal, infection at puncture site, increased intracranial pressure, inability to cooperate due to agitation or cognitive impairment)
* Acute vascular obstruction or other vascular complications not consistent with elective revascularization
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Grupo Hospitalar Conceição

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andre P Schmidt, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Andre Prato Schmidt

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Andre P Schmidt, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

5551996412212

Sabrina Coelli, MD

Role: CONTACT

5551981481343

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schmidt AP, Silvello D, Filho CTB, Bergmann D, Ferreira LEC, Nolasco MF, Pires TD, Braga WC, Andrade CF. Effects of Neuraxial or General Anesthesia on the Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Peripheral Vascular Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2025 Mar;39(3):724-732. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.12.027. Epub 2024 Dec 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39779428 (View on PubMed)

Schmidt AP, Marques AJ, Reinstein AR, Bevilacqua Filho CT, Carmona MJC, Auler JOC Jr, Felix EA, Andrade CF. Effects of protective mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2020 May;61:109656. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.109656. Epub 2019 Nov 26. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31784303 (View on PubMed)

Li A, Dreksler H, Nagpal SK, Brandys T, Jetty P, Dubois L, Parsons Leigh J, Stelfox HT, McIsaac DI, Roberts DJ. Outcomes After Neuraxial or Regional Anaesthesia Instead of General Anaesthesia for Lower Limb Revascularisation Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised and Non-Randomised Studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Mar;65(3):379-390. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.10.046. Epub 2022 Nov 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36336286 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

86625325.0.1001.5327

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.