Effect of Regional Versus General Anesthesia on Thirty-day Outcomes Following Carotid Endarterectomy: a Matched-pairs Cohort Study.
NCT ID: NCT05706688
Last Updated: 2023-01-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
37204 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-01-01
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Is regional anesthesia associated with lower incidence of major morbidity and mortality?
* Is regional anesthesia associated with lower incidences of secondary adverse events?
Participants will be sampled from the 2015-2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Regional anesthesia
4,152 patients undergoing elective carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia
Anesthetic technique (regional versus general)
Anesthetic technique (regional versus general)
General anesthesia
4,152 matched controls undergoing elective carotid endarterectomy under general anesthesia
Anesthetic technique (regional versus general)
Anesthetic technique (regional versus general)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anesthetic technique (regional versus general)
Anesthetic technique (regional versus general)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Regional anesthesia
* General anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
* Acute kidney injury (preoperative)
* End-stage renal disease (preoperative)
* Metastatic disease (preoperative)
* Wound infection (preoperative)
* Sepsis (preoperative)
* ASA 5
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Virginia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zhiyi Zuo, MD
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Zhiyi Zuo, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Virginia
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kline LA, Kothandaraman V, Knio ZO, Zuo Z. Effect of regional versus general anesthesia on thirty-day outcomes following carotid endarterectomy: a cohort study. Int J Surg. 2023 May 1;109(5):1291-1298. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000356.
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Document Type: Individual Participant Data Set
View DocumentOther Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HSRZOKZZ
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id