Depth of Anaesthesia and Long-term Survival: The Balanced Anaesthesia Follow-up Study
NCT ID: NCT04965324
Last Updated: 2021-07-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
6644 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-12-19
2021-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this large, international, randomised controlled trial that enrolled patients aged 60 years and over with significant comorbidity and at increased risk of complications after major surgery, we found no evidence that light general anaesthesia (bispectral index 50) was superior to deep general anaesthesia (bispectral index 35) in reducing 1-year mortality. The BALANCED long term follow up study will look at whether depth of anesthesia affects long term (beyond 1 year) survival.
The primary hypothesis is that targetting BIS 50 will result in superior long term survival compared to targetting BIS 35.
The two secondary hypotheses are that BIS titration to BIS 50 will
1. reduce local cancer recurrence or metastatic spread and consequently improve long-term survival
2. reduce postoperative delirium and associated cognitive impairment and consequently improve long-term survival
Both these mechanisms would be expected to take longer to manifest as reduced survival than 1-year all-cause mortality primary outcome in the Balanced trial. Trials of cancer outcomes often use 5-year survival or similar timeframes to determine evidence of clinical benefit. A steeper cognitive trajectory due to intermediate outcomes such as delirium and cognitive impairment may take longer than 1 year to produce a clinically important difference in survival 30. The 10.6% relative risk reduction seen in the Balanced trial could translate to a statistically and clinically meaningful survival difference in this high-risk population. This population may have 5-year survival of \~80% translating to an absolute survival difference of \~2% potentially (if the \~10% RRR is maintained beyond 1 year). The alternative is that there is no long-term mortality difference which would provide continuing clinical guidance of the safety of current practice in patients who are not at high risk of delirium. This study could provide a rationale for trials in larger populations (such as the total Balanced trial population) or targeted subgroups such as cancer and delirium to provide further mechanistic insights.
Long-term survival is an important patient-centred outcome. The mechanisms described above may manifest in longer-term outcomes providing a clear rationale for the current trial.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Administration of Local Anesthetics Via Two Catheters Placed During Surgery, and Study of the Benefits on Respiratory Function and Therefore on Recovery Time
NCT06463899
Influence of Sedation Strategies on Hospital LOS and ICU LOS in Patients Cardiac Surgery
NCT05809518
The Effect Site Concentration of Remifentanil for Preventing QTc Interval Prolongation During Intubation Under Propofol-remifentanil Anesthesia in Elderly Patients
NCT01720498
Comparison of General Anesthesia Hemodynamics Between R and P in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
NCT06714669
Preoperative Anxiety Level, Premedications and General Anaesthetic Proceedings
NCT03603873
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Anaesthesia Depth BIS 35
BIS 35
Anaesthesia Depth
Anaesthesia Depth BIS 50
BIS 50
Anaesthesia Depth
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anaesthesia Depth
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Age over 60 years and over
2. ASA physical status 3 or 4
3. Surgery expected to last over 2 hours
4. Hospital length of stay expected to be 2 nights or more
5. General anaesthesia with or without major regional block
6. Able to monitor BIS throughout anaesthesia
Exclusion
1. Unable to monitor BIS
2. Unable to consent
3. Surgery with 'wake up' test
4. Propofol infusion for part or all of maintenance of anaesthesia
5. Previous enrolment in Balanced study
Participants were allocated to the BIS=50 group if the achieved median BIS is between 45 and 55 inclusive, and to the BIS=35 group if the achieved median BIS is between 30 and 40 inclusive. Participants who are not within these ranges will be excluded from these analyses.
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Health Research Council, New Zealand
OTHER
Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists
OTHER
Auckland City Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Timothy Dr Short
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Auckland City Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Auckland City Hopsital
Auckland, , New Zealand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ACTRN12612000632897
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
A+9283
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.