Classifying Fully Guided Surgical Guides

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-20

Study Completion Date

2025-05-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Surgical guides can be classified according to support into tooth-supported, mucosa-supported, bone-supported, or a combination of these. Tooth-supported templates are further divided into unilateral or bilateral tooth support. Bilateral tooth-supported guides refer to templates that are supported by templates on both sides while unilateral tooth support refers to templates that is supported by teeth on one side and mucosa or bone from the other side. Usually, mucosa-supported guides are utilized in full arch cases in which there is no need for bone reduction. Stackable guides are the best option when bone reduction is indicated because they allow for the planning of both implant osteotomies and bone sculpturing using a single template made up of different components. This study compare all static guided protocols( bilateral tooth supported, unilateral tooth supported, full arch mucosa supported, stackable bone supported ) with each other under homogenous conditions.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Fully Guided Dental Implant Placement and Primary Stability

NCT07149987

Dental Implant Dental Implant Failure Peri Implantitis +1 more

COMPLETED NA

A Study of Surgical Guide Assisted Dental Implantation in Bangladesh

NCT05983718

Partially Edentulous Mandible Dental Implantation

UNKNOWN NA

Peri-implant Soft Tissue and Bone Evaluation in Fully Computer Guided Immediate Implants

NCT06733870

Soft Tissue Healing

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA

DLP Versus SLM Stackable Surgical Guide

NCT05617443

Accuracy of Stackable Guide

COMPLETED NA

Accuracy of Computer Guided Four Implants Placement in Completely Edentulous Mandible

NCT06571968

Implant Placement

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Surgical guides can be classified according to support into tooth-supported, mucosa-supported, bone-supported, or a combination of these. Tooth-supported templates are further divided into unilateral or bilateral tooth support. Bilateral tooth-supported guides refer to templates that are supported by templates on both sides while unilateral tooth support refers to templates that is supported by teeth on one side and mucosa or bone from the other side. Usually, mucosa-supported guides are utilized in full arch cases in which there is no need for bone reduction. Stackable guides are the best option when bone reduction is indicated because they allow for the planning of both implant osteotomies and bone sculpturing using a single template made up of different components.

Theoretically, bilateral tooth-supported guides offer the most accuracy since they offer the best retention and biomechanical stability with anchorage on hard tissues. According to a recent systematic review, unilateral tooth guides exhibited higher deviations except in global coronal deviation where unilateral tooth-supported guides exhibited slightly lower distribution than bilateral guides, and in in vivo global apical deviation where bilateral and unilateral tooth-supported guides showed a similar data range.

Despite the increasing predictability of guided surgery, there will always be differences between the virtual plan and actual performance. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant operations was assessed in the 2018 International Team for Implantology consensus document. According to the study, the variations for the mean crestal point, apical point, angle, coronal depth, and apical depth were 1.2 mm, 1.4 mm, 3.5 o, 0.2 mm, and 0.5 mm, respectively. A safety margin of 2 mm ought to be taken into account at all times, based on the previously indicated precision.

For the purposes of this study, accuracy is defined as the closeness of spatial agreement between any given implant as planned (reference) and as inserted (measurement), expressed by four spatial deviation parameters

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Prostheses

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Unilateral tooth supported

Unilateral guided implant placement

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR