Comparison of T-loop vs Opus Loop in Canine Retraction Efficacy and Anchorage Loss Control

NCT ID: NCT06945575

Last Updated: 2025-07-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-04

Study Completion Date

2025-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary aim of this split-mouth randomized control trial is to compare the rate of canine retraction between the T loop and the Opus loop. The secondary objectives are to compare the angulation of the canine, changes in the first molar position in terms of anchorage loss, and molar rotation for the two loops used T-loop and Opus loop will be placed randomly on the right and left quadrants of patients for canine retraction and outcomes will be measured before and after completion of canine retraction

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

T-loop and Opus loop will be placed in the right and left quadrants of the patient for canine retraction after initial leveling and alignment. canine retraction rate will be measured by using a calibrated caliper every month. canine angulation will be evaluated by periapical x-ray which will be taken before and after completion of canine retraction and anchorage loss and molar rotation will be assessed by model analysis

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Space Closure, Orthodontic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Opus loop

Opus loop will be inserted from 1st molar to canine for canine retraction. it will be activated every month

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Opus loop

Intervention Type OTHER

17X25SS will used to fabricate opus loop which is L shaped loop with helix

T-loop

T loop will be inserted from 1st molar to canine for canine retraction. it will be activated every month

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

T loop

Intervention Type OTHER

17X25SS wire will be used to fabricate T-loop which is a T shaped loop

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Opus loop

17X25SS will used to fabricate opus loop which is L shaped loop with helix

Intervention Type OTHER

T loop

17X25SS wire will be used to fabricate T-loop which is a T shaped loop

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

opus

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Age between 14 -40 years Extractions of maxillary 1st premolars Class 1, 1/4th, 1/2, and 3/4th unit Class II molar relation Presence of all teeth up to the second molar Good oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria

Full cusp Class II Developmental, medical, or genetic problems Patient using bisphosphonates Spacing in dentition Grossly carious upper molars that cannot be restored Patient with active periodontal disease Severe crowding
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dow University of Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Maria Moin

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bahria University Health Sciences

Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DowUHS 2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.