Poul Gjessing Versus T Loops for Orthodontic Maxillary Canine Retraction

NCT ID: NCT05727124

Last Updated: 2023-02-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-08-01

Study Completion Date

2025-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Poul Gjessing versus T loops for orthodontic maxillary canine

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Split mouth study one side using Poul Gjessing spring and other side using T loops

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Canine Retraction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Evaluation of Poul Gjessing spring for orthodontic maxillary canine retraction

20 Orthodontic patient treated by Poul Gjessing spring for canine retraction split mouth.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Poul Gjessing

Intervention Type DEVICE

maxillary canine retraction

Evaluation of T loop for orthodontic maxillary canine retraction

20 Orthodontic patient treated by T loop for canine retraction split mouth

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

T loops

Intervention Type DEVICE

T loops

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Poul Gjessing

maxillary canine retraction

Intervention Type DEVICE

T loops

T loops

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* \- Class I or II div 1, orthodontic patients, with moderate to severe crowding who are indicated for maxillary first premolar extraction. 2- All permanent teeth are erupted (3rd molars are not included). 3- Good oral and general health. 4- No previous orthodontic treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

\- 1- Orthodontic cases that could be treated with no indication for extraction therapy.

2- Orthodontic cases that are indicate for the extraction of any tooth other than maxillary first premolars. 3- Patients with systemic diseases that might interfere with the of orthodontic tooth movement.
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Al-Azhar University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Saleh Abdullah Mohammed Abdulsalam

BDS(2018) ,Faculty of dentistry, Aden university, Yemen

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alazhar university

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

790/2251

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.