Does the Generation to Which the Operator Belongs Influence the Orthodontic Miniscrew Insertion Accuracy in Dynamic Computer-guided Surgery?

NCT ID: NCT06661551

Last Updated: 2024-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-12-01

Study Completion Date

2024-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to access the miniscrew accuracy insertion via dynamic computer-guided systems, inserted by three different clinicians belonging to three different generations, in childern in late mixed dentition or permanent dentition that need for orthodontic treatment, with good oral hygiene and absence of acute infection in the oral cavity and good general healt. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Are there statistically significant differences between accuracy parameters and generation to which the clinician belongs?
* Does exist a significant correlation between the deviation parameters and the number of surgeries, and between the duration of interventions and the number of surgeries? Researchers wirll compare the deviation parameters to see if there are statistically significant differences in terms of accuracy.

Participants will undergo a surgical procedure of placement of 2 orthodontic miniscrews in the palatal region, and then a post-operative CBCT to assess the accuracy and presence or absence of damage to adjacent structures

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study will be conducted to evaluate intergenerational differences regarding orthodontic miniscrew placement accuracy in the palatine vault through dynamic computer-guided surgery. The secondary outcome will be to assess, for each operator, the correlation between the number of miniscrews inserted, i.e. surgeries, and the accuracy variables as well as the duration of interventions.

The clinical investigation will be conducted between December 2022 and September 2024, adhering to the ethical standards outlined in the seventh revision of the Declaration of Helsinki. Parents and guardians are going to be informed about the details of the study, including the benefits and potential risks, and provided written consent. The investigation is approved by the local ethics committee (no. 5951).

The eligibility criteria are: (1) children in late mixed dentition or permanent dentition, (2) need for orthodontic treatment, (3) good oral hygiene, (4) absence of acute infection in the oral cavity, (5) good general health. The exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) syndromic patients, (2) uncontrolled systemic disease.

Miniscrews will be placed by three different clinicians, belonging to three different generations and levels of experience in implant and orthodontic miniscrew placement in free-hand and static computer-guided surgery.

A block randomization sequence is going to be generated using the Sealed Envelope online tool (https://www.sealedenvelope.com) to allocate the subjects into three groups. The random allocation sequence generation, enrollment, and assignment of the participants to interventions will be done by an external researcher not involved in the research. The allocation ratio of the subjects will be balanced, based on the generation to which the researchers belong.

Group A is going to be treated by operator number 1, an oral surgeon with more than 30 Years of experience, which belongs to "Generation X"; operator number 2 (MG) will treat Group B and is a dentist with 15 years of experience in oral surgery and belonged to "Generation Y"; Group C will be treated by operator number 3 (DB), a final year dental student with no previous experience in oral surgery, that belonged to "Generation Z". However, all three were novices in the use of dynamic computer-guided surgical systems, and no pre-clinical training phase was done.

In order to achieve skeletal anchorage for orthodontic or orthopedic treatment, the miniscrews (BENEfit®, Benefit system; PSM Medical Solutions, Tuttlingen, Germany) will be inserted under local anesthesia, in the paramedian area of the hard palate at the level of the third palatine rugae, and to guarantee a minimally-invasive, flapless and pre-drilling free approach, the miniscrews will be inserted using the Navident dynamic navigation system (ClaroNav Technology Inc., Toronto, Canada), through a NSK iSD900 cordless battery screwdriver (Nakanishi INC., Tochigi, Japan).

The patients will undergo to optical scanning, using a Medit i700 intraoral scanner (Medit Corp., Seoul, South Korea) and CBCT imaging of the upper jaw, captured using a Scanora 3Dx cone-beam device (Soredex, Tuusula, Finland).

The resulting STL (Standard Triangulation Language) and DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) files are going to be superimposed to precisely determine the insertion site, diameter, and length of the miniscrews to achieve bicortical anchorage.

To evaluate the accuracy of miniscrew placement and to detect any potential root injury, a postoperative CBCT scan was conducted immediately after each surgical procedure.

The preoperative and postoperative images were superimposed, through the use of EvaluNav software (ClaroNav Technology Inc., Toronto, Canada), employing coordinated automatically given by the software as previously described \[3, 10, 26\]. To assess the differences between the planned position and the actual placement of miniscrews, five deviation parameters will be analyzed: Entry-3D, Entry-2D, Apex-3D, Apex vertical (vertical deviation), Angular deviation (Figure 2) The duration of the surgeries will be calculated by an external researcher using the Navident Software (ClaroNav Technology Inc., Toronto, Canada) from the moment when the Navigation View appears to the end of the navigation phase.

The sample size was calculated based on a previous study using G\*Power software (version 3.1.9.6; Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany). The significance level was set at 0.05 and the power at 0.8. A total sample size of thirty-three os considered acceptable, with an actual power of 0.81.

To reduce the risk of statistical analysis bias, the operator variable will be coded, and a blinded statistician will perform the statistical analysis, using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA) to create a database to allocate the subjects, and the statistical software package SPSS version 27.0 (IBM Corp., New York, USA).

Descriptive statistics analysis (including mean, minimum, maximum values, confidence interval at 95% and standard deviations) is going to be performed for each variable within each group.

Subsequently, the Shapiro-Wilk normality test will be conducted to assess the distribution of the data. For variables following a normal distribution, the ANOVA test will be employed; whereas, for variables exhibiting a non-normal distribution, a non-parametric test, namely the Kruskal-Wallis H test, is performed. In cases where the tests indicated statistically significant differences, post-hoc tests will be subsequently conducted. The Tukey test is going to be used for variables with a normal distribution, and the Dunn's for a non-normal distribution.

Furthermore, the Pearson Correlation will be utilized to analyze whether the number of surgeries influenced the deviation variables (Entry-3D, Entry-2D, Apex-3D, Apex Vertical, Angular deviation, duration of the intervention).

The level of significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malocclusion Malocclusion in Children Malocclusion; Displaced or Missing Teeth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A (Generation X operator)

Group A is going to be treated by operator number 1, an oral surgeon with more than 30 Years of experience, which belongs to "Generation X"

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The intervention more executed in the literature is by using static computer-guided systems (s-CAS) . However, the s-CAS has limitations, including the time and cost associated with guide production, furthermore, the guide's bulk prevents its use in patients with limited mouth opening, and reduced irrigation potentially leads to overheating and bone burns during implant placement. Additionally, the inability to adjust the surgical plan intraoperatively, the lack of real-time visualization during implant site preparation and implant insertion, and the requirement for specific surgical kits for each implant system present further challenges.

Dynamic navigation systems offer several benefits as highlighted in the literature, including: real-time feedback of the position of surgical drill or implant, allowing intraoperative changes adjusting the implant position during the surgery, reduction of risk of injury to adjacent anatomical structures, promotion of accuracy in novices

Group B (Generation Y operator)

Operator number 2 (MG) will treat Group B and is a dentist with 15 years of experience in oral surgery and belonged to "Generation Y".

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The intervention more executed in the literature is by using static computer-guided systems (s-CAS) . However, the s-CAS has limitations, including the time and cost associated with guide production, furthermore, the guide's bulk prevents its use in patients with limited mouth opening, and reduced irrigation potentially leads to overheating and bone burns during implant placement. Additionally, the inability to adjust the surgical plan intraoperatively, the lack of real-time visualization during implant site preparation and implant insertion, and the requirement for specific surgical kits for each implant system present further challenges.

Dynamic navigation systems offer several benefits as highlighted in the literature, including: real-time feedback of the position of surgical drill or implant, allowing intraoperative changes adjusting the implant position during the surgery, reduction of risk of injury to adjacent anatomical structures, promotion of accuracy in novices

Group C (Generation Z operator)

Group C will be treated by operator number 3 (DB), a final year dental student with no previous experience in oral surgery, that belonged to "Generation Z".

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The intervention more executed in the literature is by using static computer-guided systems (s-CAS) . However, the s-CAS has limitations, including the time and cost associated with guide production, furthermore, the guide's bulk prevents its use in patients with limited mouth opening, and reduced irrigation potentially leads to overheating and bone burns during implant placement. Additionally, the inability to adjust the surgical plan intraoperatively, the lack of real-time visualization during implant site preparation and implant insertion, and the requirement for specific surgical kits for each implant system present further challenges.

Dynamic navigation systems offer several benefits as highlighted in the literature, including: real-time feedback of the position of surgical drill or implant, allowing intraoperative changes adjusting the implant position during the surgery, reduction of risk of injury to adjacent anatomical structures, promotion of accuracy in novices

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgery

The intervention more executed in the literature is by using static computer-guided systems (s-CAS) . However, the s-CAS has limitations, including the time and cost associated with guide production, furthermore, the guide's bulk prevents its use in patients with limited mouth opening, and reduced irrigation potentially leads to overheating and bone burns during implant placement. Additionally, the inability to adjust the surgical plan intraoperatively, the lack of real-time visualization during implant site preparation and implant insertion, and the requirement for specific surgical kits for each implant system present further challenges.

Dynamic navigation systems offer several benefits as highlighted in the literature, including: real-time feedback of the position of surgical drill or implant, allowing intraoperative changes adjusting the implant position during the surgery, reduction of risk of injury to adjacent anatomical structures, promotion of accuracy in novices

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children in late mixed dentition or permanent dentition;
* Need for orthodontic treatment;
* Good oral hygiene;
* Absence of acute infection in the oral cavity;
* Good general health.

Exclusion Criteria

* Syndromic patients;
* Uncontrolled systemic disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Roma La Sapienza

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michele Cassetta

DDS, PhD, Full Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Policlinico Umberto I

Rome, Italy, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Brilli D, Cauli I, Cassetta M. How palatal vault morphology and screw length influence the accuracy of dynamic computer-guided orthodontic miniscrew insertion. A prospective clinical study. J Dent. 2024 Jul;146:105093. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105093. Epub 2024 May 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38788916 (View on PubMed)

S. Bertoldo, D. Brilli, I. Cauli, M. Cassetta, Dynamic navigation for miniscrew insertion in the palatal vault: a pilot study, Dental Cadmos 7 (2024). https://doi.org/10.19256/d.cadmos.07.2024.06.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Brilli D, Giansanti M, Cassetta M. Does the operator's generational cohort influence the accuracy of orthodontic miniscrews insertion in the palatine vault in dynamic computer-guided surgery? A randomized prospective study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Jun 10;29(1):120. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01414-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40493264 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

URomLS_5951

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Early Orthodontic Treatment of Dental Crowding
NCT04756843 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA