The Effectiveness of Acrylic and Clear Aligners in the Treatment of Anterior Crossbite in Children

NCT ID: NCT06792513

Last Updated: 2025-01-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-10

Study Completion Date

2024-11-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the treatment efficacy, treatment duration, and cephalometric changes, as well as the impact on quality of life, of clear aligners and labiolingual spring Hawley appliances in the treatment of pediatric patients with anterior crossbite.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Two groups were treated with clear aligners and labiolingual springs Hawley and the study consisted of 30 patients, 15 patients in each group. Cast analysis and cephalometric analysis were performed at pretreatment and posttreatment. Quality of life was assessed at the end of treatment for both groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anterior Crossbite

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Clear aligner (group treated with clear aligner)

2 parallel groups one treated with clear aligner and other treated using labiolingual spring Hawley appliances

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Clear Aligner

Intervention Type DEVICE

In this intervention, clear aligners were digitally designed using three-dimensional models for the upper jaw. Attachments were applied to the patients, specifically placed on the incisors exhibiting a crossbite relationship and on the permanent first molars in the posterior region. The series of clear aligners were replaced every 10 days. The aligners were used full-time, except during meals and tooth brushing.

Labiolingual spring Hawley appliances (group treated with labiolingual spring Hawley appliances)

2 parallel groups one treated with clear aligner and other treated using labiolingual spring Hawley appliances

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Labiolingual Spring Hawley Appliance

Intervention Type DEVICE

In this intervention, a custom-made labiolingual spring Hawley appliance was designed for the upper jaw. It included two Adams clasps, a vestibular arch, and an active labiolingual spring positioned on the palatal side of the incisor in crossbite. The spring was activated every 10 days. The appliance was used full-time, except during meals and tooth brushing.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Clear Aligner

In this intervention, clear aligners were digitally designed using three-dimensional models for the upper jaw. Attachments were applied to the patients, specifically placed on the incisors exhibiting a crossbite relationship and on the permanent first molars in the posterior region. The series of clear aligners were replaced every 10 days. The aligners were used full-time, except during meals and tooth brushing.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Labiolingual Spring Hawley Appliance

In this intervention, a custom-made labiolingual spring Hawley appliance was designed for the upper jaw. It included two Adams clasps, a vestibular arch, and an active labiolingual spring positioned on the palatal side of the incisor in crossbite. The spring was activated every 10 days. The appliance was used full-time, except during meals and tooth brushing.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Z spring appliance

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. In the mixed dentition phase, aged between 7-12 years
2. With a dental Class I molar relationship according to Angle's classification
3. ANB within the normal range i.e. (the crossbite will be diagnosed as dental)
4. Exhibiting anterior crossbite (AC) in at least one permanent incisor in the sagittal plane
5. No prior orthodontic treatment for any reason
6. No history of maxillofacial trauma
7. No systemic diseases or syndromes that may interfere with treatment
8. Able to attend regular appointments and cooperate with instructions throughout the treatment process

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with functional anterior crossbite associated with mandibular functional shift
2. Patients with clinically evident retrognathia or prognathia of the maxilla or mandible
3. Patients with severe gingivitis or periodontitis
4. Patients with known allergies to the materials to be used in the treatment
5. Patients with severe dental anomalies (e.g., supernumerary teeth, missing teeth, dental malformations)
6. Patients with serious emotional or psychological issues that may hinder treatment compliance
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Akdeniz University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ozge Gungor

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ozge Gungor

PhD, DDS, Clinical Associate Professor of Pedodontics

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Özge Güngör, PhD, DDS, Assoc. Prof.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Akdeniz University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Akdeniz University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry

Antalya, Konyaaltı, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AUBNG001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Early Orthodontic Treatment of Dental Crowding
NCT04756843 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA