MedDataX Logo

Effects of a Finishing Protocol Implementation in Orthodontic Patients

NCT ID: NCT02290158

Last Updated: 2015-12-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-06-30

Study Completion Date

2015-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates the effects of a finishing protocol in orthodontic outcomes using ABO-OGS scores. Patients who finish orthodontic treatment and fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria receive a treatment using a finishing protocol and their scores are compare with 40 patients who don't receive a finishing protocol

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The phase of finishing is the most demanding and detailed of all phases of the orthodontic treatment. American Board of Orthodontics- Objective Grading system is a detailed and objective method that evaluates the quality of the final outcome of orthodontic treatment. In order to evaluate and compare the effects of a protocol implementation on the ABO-OGS scores, standardize cast models and Pan X-Ray from by convenience patients of Orthodontic Postgraduate Program of University of Antioquia who finish orthodontic treatment and receive the protocol are digitized, eight variables are evaluate and ABO-OGS score is calculate. A comparison with 40 no-protocol ABO-OGS scores by convenience-selected patients is done. The protocol includes an educate residents program about finishing problems , an standardized clinical and X-ray assessment , brackets reposition and frequent clinical evaluation. The percentage of the protocol implementation is calculate in every patient and reliability test is make . The descriptive analysis and the ABO-OGS score comparison is done by Pearson or Spearman correlation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malocclusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Orthodontic finishing

Patients receiving a complete orthodontic finishing protocol according to the ABO-OGS

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Finishing Protocol

Intervention Type OTHER

Students education, cast models and Panoramic X-ray assessment, brackets reposition and frequent clinical evaluation.

No orthodontic finishing

Patients receiving orthodontic treatment without the finishing protocol according to the ABO-OGS

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Finishing Protocol

Students education, cast models and Panoramic X-ray assessment, brackets reposition and frequent clinical evaluation.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who finish orthodontic treatment by orthodontic criteria
* Receive finishing protocol
* Accept and sign inform consent
* Records ( Panoramic Xray and cast models) taken immediately or 7 days after orthodontic appliances are remove

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who don't accept being at the study
* Bad quality records
* Prosthodontic, periodontic and surgical needs treatment after orthodontic treatment
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad de Antioquia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alvaro Carvajal

Asociated Pofessor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uniersidad de Antioquia

Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Colombia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BACAZA1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id