Efficacy of Flow Restrictors in Limiting Access of Liquid Medicines by Young Children
NCT ID: NCT06938620
Last Updated: 2025-04-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-04-30
2012-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Design Factors for Evaluating Child Resistant Packaging
NCT03925623
Parental Adherence of a Mobile Application
NCT06672042
Study of the Impact of Parental Note Taking on the Effectiveness of Anticipatory Guidance
NCT01014169
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a School Disinfection and Hand Hygiene Program
NCT00514670
Epilepsy Adherence in Children and Technology (eACT)
NCT03817229
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study sought to determine whether adding flow restrictors, adapters added to the neck of a bottle to limit the release of liquid, to liquid medicine bottles can provide additional protection against unsupervised medicine ingestions by young children. A modified version of the standard child test protocol for re-closeable packages outlined in the Poison Prevention Packaging Act (PPPA protocol) was used to assess the efficacy of flow restrictors in limiting children's access to liquid medicines. Preschool-aged children participated in two 10-minute trials in which they were asked to try to "get everything out" of bottles filled with test liquid (a food product with similar flow characteristics to liquid medicine). Randomized block design was used to assign specific bottles to participants. Each child tested an uncapped bottle with a flow restrictor (FR-bottle) for one trial (1 of 3 designs randomly assigned). For the other trial, the child tested a control bottle (a traditional bottle either no cap or an incompletely-closed child-resistant cap). The amount of liquid the child removed from each bottle was measured and the time required to empty bottles was recorded. If flow restrictors limit the amount of liquid a young child can access, even when the outer child-resistant cap is not fully secured, their use could potentially be expanded to other liquid medicines.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bottle with a flow restrictor
Bottle with 1 of 3 randomly assigned flow restrictor designs (FR-bottle)
Bottle with a flow restrictor
Flow restrictors added to liquid medicine bottles to determine whether they limit accessibility of liquid bottle contents to young children compared with control bottles without flow restrictors.
Control bottle
Traditional bottle either no cap or an incompletely-closed child-resistant cap
Control bottle
Traditional bottle either no cap or an incompletely-closed child-resistant cap
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bottle with a flow restrictor
Flow restrictors added to liquid medicine bottles to determine whether they limit accessibility of liquid bottle contents to young children compared with control bottles without flow restrictors.
Control bottle
Traditional bottle either no cap or an incompletely-closed child-resistant cap
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Is between 36 - 59 months of age
* Is an English speaker
Exclusion Criteria
* Has known allergies/restrictions to ingesting any ingredients in the test liquid
36 Months
59 Months
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Grady Health System
OTHER
Emory University
OTHER
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniel S Budnitz, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDC-NCEZID-6162
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.