Use of Facility Ratings to Improve Satisfaction With Heath Care for Children
NCT ID: NCT06304831
Last Updated: 2025-01-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
559 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-11
2024-10-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of an Intervention on Vaccine Hesitancy Among Pediatric Nurses and Pediatricians
NCT06489236
Presumptively Initiating Vaccines and Optimizing Talk With Motivational Interviewing (PIVOT With MI)
NCT03885232
Quality of Life in Cardiac Pediatric Patients Attending Assuit Univeristy Hospital
NCT04354844
Improving Pediatric COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Using an mHealth Tool
NCT05386355
Effect of Preoperative Information to Parents Before Ear-nose-throat Pediatric Surgery
NCT03763292
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Expanding access has also resulted in increasing options for public and private health care providers. Selecting a health provider or a facility, however, is difficult because timely and reliable information about providers is not readily available. People often rely on social networks or previous experiences to select providers. However, in Lao PDR, only 28% describe their recent visit to a health care provider as high-quality, suggesting that while there are increasing options for care, people may need support to find providers that meet their quality needs.
In order to inform efforts to improve people's access to high-quality care, there is a need for evidence on mechanisms to empower people to identify and use high-quality care. In LMICs, majority of efforts to date has focused on supply-side efforts. While there are new initiatives to study population perspectives and people's care experiences, measures to "ignite demand" for high-quality care are not well understood.
The investigators plan to conduct a randomized-controlled experiment using mobile-phones to study whether routinely collected information on quality of care received by peers can improve access to high-quality care and patient satisfaction. The investigators plan to study whether participants switched providers based on the information provided and the type of information mothers used to switch providers. Additionally, The investigators plan to study whether information about providers led women to be more satisfied with health care services for their child or children. Study participants will include mothers living in an urban setting with less than 2-year old children and already enrolled in an on-going VITERBI cohort in Vientiane, the capital city.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
The intervention group will receive biweekly updates about quality ratings of recently visited health care providers for children by everyone enrolled in the study.
Quality ratings of health care providers for children
Ratings of overall and components of quality (provider knowledge, respectfulness of provider, respectfulness of staff, cleanliness, cost) of health care providers for children will be provided on a webpage. The webpage will be updated every week and participants will be invited to access the latest ratings biweekly.
Control
The control group will not receive any information about health care providers for children.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Quality ratings of health care providers for children
Ratings of overall and components of quality (provider knowledge, respectfulness of provider, respectfulness of staff, cleanliness, cost) of health care providers for children will be provided on a webpage. The webpage will be updated every week and participants will be invited to access the latest ratings biweekly.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lao Tropical and Public Health Institute
OTHER_GOV
Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Günther Fink, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
Amit Aryal, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lao Tropical and Public Health Institute
Vientiane, Vientiane Capital, Laos
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Aryal A, Clarke-Deelder E, Sayasone S, Fink G. Informing Facility Selection Through a Web-Based User Ratings System: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Among Mothers in Urban Lao People's Democratic Republic. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Sep 4;14:e66085. doi: 10.2196/66085.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SwissTI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.