Mixed Vs Blocked Search: Four Unique Tasks

NCT ID: NCT06933693

Last Updated: 2025-04-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-01

Study Completion Date

2029-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal is to look for qualitative differences in visual search behavior when one search is performed many times in a row compared to when multiple search tasks are intermixed. Four search tasks are tested. In the Mixed condition, the four tasks are randomly changed from trial to trial. In the Blocked condition, each task is run as a block of 100 trials.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

NOTE: This registration is linked to a Human Subjects registration in ASSIST. That, in turn, is part of an NCI Grant, R01EY017001. The grant describes many proposed experiments and notes that many others might be done as follow-up studies. At the suggestion of the NIH, the investigators grouped these studies into several "studies", each covering multiple experiments. The experiment described here is part of Aim 1 of R01EY017001. It is not possible to register a set of experiments through the PRS system in CT.gov and it is not possible to file an annual report for the grant (RPPR) without an NCT number for projects that have started collecting participants. Accordingly, the investigators are describing one experiment here that would be part of the "Project 1" bundle of studies.

When scientists study visual search in the lab, they usually ask people to do dozens of instances of the same type of task in a block. (e.g., Please find a vertical line….in the next 100 trials). However, in many (maybe most) visual searches in the real world, the participants are rarely looking for the same item (or same type of item) back-to-back. You do one search. Then the participants do another, and so on. (Find the jam. Now, find the bread. Now find a knife, etc). We want to know if the investigators would get the same results if the investigators mixed different searches together as the investigators do when the investigators test in long blocks of one specific type of search. This is important because the investigators want to know if the rules, established by years of blocked experiments, continue to apply in the more mixed real world.

There are multiple variants of this mixed/block experiment. In Experiment 1, observers are trained on four different search tasks. Then they perform 400 trials in the Mixed condition and the Blocked condition. In the Mixed condition, the four tasks are randomly changed from trial to trial. In the Blocked condition, each task is run as a block of 100 trials. Stimuli are placed in random locations in a jiggled 5 x 5 grid. The grid are placed within square field that is 0.5 of the maximum height of the screen. Each stimulus item fit into an invisible box that is 0.11 of the screen height. If the viewing distance is about 60 cm, a standard computer screen would show a stimulus field of about 15 deg on a side and each item would be placed in a box of about 3 x 3 deg. The background is white. Trials are divided evenly between three set sizes: 8, 16, and 24 items and evenly between target-present and absent trials. Stimuli are presented until the observer responds by pressing either 'p' or 'q' to indicate target present or absent, respectively. Accuracy feedback is provided after each trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vision Healthy Attention

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Each observer will do 400 "mixed" trials and 400 "blocked trials.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Blocked Trials

There are four search tasks in this experiment. Each task will be presented in a separate block of 100 trials

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Blocked Trials

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Each search task will be presented in a block of trials.

Mixed Trials

There are four search tasks in this experiment. All tasks will be randomly mixed in a single block of 400 trials.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mixed trials

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All tasks will be randomly mixed in a single block of 400 trials.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mixed trials

All tasks will be randomly mixed in a single block of 400 trials.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Blocked Trials

Each search task will be presented in a block of trials.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pass Ishihara color vision test

Exclusion Criteria

* vision less than 20/25 with correction
* history of neuromuscular or visual disorders
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Eye Institute (NEI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jeremy M Wolfe, PhD

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeremy M Wolfe, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Brigham & Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jeremy M Wolfe, PhD

Role: CONTACT

6178511166

Cailey Tennyson, BA

Role: CONTACT

617-525-3681

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Cailey Tennyson, BA

Role: primary

617-525-3681

Jeremy M Wolfe, PhD

Role: backup

617-851-1166

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01EY017001

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

2007P000646-G

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Visual Attention and Eye Movements
NCT03298737 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Dyslexics' Visual Attention Field
NCT03285789 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Systematic Psychophysical
NCT06965478 RECRUITING NA
Mechanisms of Perceptual Learning
NCT06822101 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Intermediate Visual Space Perception
NCT05419713 RECRUITING NA
Active Cue-Training in Neglect
NCT02945592 COMPLETED NA