Evaluation of The Effectiveness of The SAFE Early Intervention Program
NCT ID: NCT06930482
Last Updated: 2025-04-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
46 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-01
2023-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Family Collaborative Physiotherapy Programs With High-risk Infants
NCT04035291
Sensory Integration Therapy and Cerebral Palsy
NCT05966428
Sensory Integration Therapy and Function in Cerebral Palsy
NCT07278635
Efficacy of the START-Play Program for Infants With Neuromotor Disorders
NCT02593825
Physiotherapy of At-Risk Infants, Physiotherapist or Family?
NCT02681289
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SAFE Early Intervention Group
Safe early intervention
The SAFE early intervention approach, an activity-focused, sensory intervention program, was applied to the babies in the intervention group in an enriched environment. As part of the intervention, coaching was provided in collaboration with the family on how to support the baby's development. For this purpose, family visits were made 15 days after the initial assessment and once a month. During these visits, the suggestions given to the family were repeated and all questions about the process were answered. It was discussed how the home environment should be structured in a way that is appropriate for the baby's development. The aims of the approaches applied were explained and information was provided about the follow-up process. In order to follow up on whether the family implemented the intervention, the family was interviewed by phone and the family was asked to keep an activity diary.
early intervention approach based on neurodevelopmental treatment
Within the scope of the study, NGT-based applications were applied to the babies included in the control group by their families. After the first assessment, activities were planned to support skills appropriate to the child's developmental level. The treatment movements, how to facilitate the baby's movements, and how to provide hand contact were demonstrated to the families in practice. The applicability of the intervention program was monitored with weekly phone calls. The babies were called to the clinic environment for a check-up every month to revise the intervention program and teach new movements, and an evaluation was made. Two home visits were made to evaluate the families' home environments and parental attitudes (pre- and post-intervention).
Control Group
Safe early intervention
The SAFE early intervention approach, an activity-focused, sensory intervention program, was applied to the babies in the intervention group in an enriched environment. As part of the intervention, coaching was provided in collaboration with the family on how to support the baby's development. For this purpose, family visits were made 15 days after the initial assessment and once a month. During these visits, the suggestions given to the family were repeated and all questions about the process were answered. It was discussed how the home environment should be structured in a way that is appropriate for the baby's development. The aims of the approaches applied were explained and information was provided about the follow-up process. In order to follow up on whether the family implemented the intervention, the family was interviewed by phone and the family was asked to keep an activity diary.
early intervention approach based on neurodevelopmental treatment
Within the scope of the study, NGT-based applications were applied to the babies included in the control group by their families. After the first assessment, activities were planned to support skills appropriate to the child's developmental level. The treatment movements, how to facilitate the baby's movements, and how to provide hand contact were demonstrated to the families in practice. The applicability of the intervention program was monitored with weekly phone calls. The babies were called to the clinic environment for a check-up every month to revise the intervention program and teach new movements, and an evaluation was made. Two home visits were made to evaluate the families' home environments and parental attitudes (pre- and post-intervention).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Safe early intervention
The SAFE early intervention approach, an activity-focused, sensory intervention program, was applied to the babies in the intervention group in an enriched environment. As part of the intervention, coaching was provided in collaboration with the family on how to support the baby's development. For this purpose, family visits were made 15 days after the initial assessment and once a month. During these visits, the suggestions given to the family were repeated and all questions about the process were answered. It was discussed how the home environment should be structured in a way that is appropriate for the baby's development. The aims of the approaches applied were explained and information was provided about the follow-up process. In order to follow up on whether the family implemented the intervention, the family was interviewed by phone and the family was asked to keep an activity diary.
early intervention approach based on neurodevelopmental treatment
Within the scope of the study, NGT-based applications were applied to the babies included in the control group by their families. After the first assessment, activities were planned to support skills appropriate to the child's developmental level. The treatment movements, how to facilitate the baby's movements, and how to provide hand contact were demonstrated to the families in practice. The applicability of the intervention program was monitored with weekly phone calls. The babies were called to the clinic environment for a check-up every month to revise the intervention program and teach new movements, and an evaluation was made. Two home visits were made to evaluate the families' home environments and parental attitudes (pre- and post-intervention).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Parents do not speak Turkish
3 Months
12 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Gazi University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ayse Simsek
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Erzurum Technical University
Erzurum, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Yildiz R, Yildiz A, Apaydin U, Efkere PA, Gucuyener K, Hirfanoglu IM, Elbasan B. Long-Term Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of the SAFE Early Intervention in Infants at Risk: A Randomised Controlled Trial. J Paediatr Child Health. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1111/jpc.70191. Online ahead of print.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
91610558-302.08.01-122723
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.