Preoperative Anemia Affected to Postoperative Outcomes in Liver Resection

NCT ID: NCT06905041

Last Updated: 2025-04-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

728 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-31

Study Completion Date

2027-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To assess the impact of preoperative anemia on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing liver resection

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Globally, anemia affects approximately 33% of the population, with nearly 50% of cases attributed to iron deficiency. In Thailand, anemia remains a significant public health issue, with prevalence rates of 24% among women of reproductive age, 23.8% among nonpregnant women, and 32.2% among pregnant women. Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is the leading and most common cause of anemia worldwide, and it is highly prevalent in Thailand. Moreover, the situation in Thailand is often exacerbated by the widespread incidence of thalassemia and hemoglobinopathies, with 30% to 40% of the population carrying thalassemia genes.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), anemia is defined as a hemoglobin concentration of less than 12 g/dL in nonpregnant women and less than 13 g/dL in men. The prevalence of preoperative anemia among surgical patients has been reported to be between 32% and 48%. Preoperative anemia is one of the most common medical conditions encountered in surgical patients, with a prevalence ranging from 20% to 45% depending on the type of surgery. Specifically, in hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery, 16.9% to 32.8% of patients present with anemia prior to surgery.

Preoperative anemia is a well-established predictor of the need for perioperative blood transfusions in liver resection, as supported by multiple studies. Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions are associated with numerous adverse outcomes, both short-term and long-term. These include transfusion reactions, increased rates of postoperative infections, cardiopulmonary and thromboembolic events, prolonged mechanical ventilation, re-operations, extended hospital and ICU stays, elevated postoperative morbidity, increased tumor recurrence, reduced disease-specific survival, and decreased overall survival.

A large retrospective study reported a prevalence of preoperative anemia at 32.8%, which was associated with higher rates of postoperative major morbidities and mortality. After adjusting for confounding factors-such as age, type of liver resection, ASA classification, preoperative laboratory results, comorbidities, functional status, and diagnosis-patients with preoperative anemia were found to have a 21% higher risk of developing major morbidities within 30 days (adjusted odds ratio 1.21, 1.09-1.33). These morbidities included organ space infections, sepsis, septic shock, prolonged postoperative ventilator use (\>48 hours), unplanned reintubation, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury requiring dialysis. However, preoperative anemia was not associated with increased postoperative mortality in liver resection (adjusted odds ratio 0.88, 0.66-1.16).

Furthermore, a retrospective study involving 4,170 patients demonstrated that preoperative anemia was associated with an increased risk of major postoperative complications compared to patients without anemia (24% versus 19%). After adjusting for confounders, including age, sex, race, obesity, extent of liver resection, comorbidities, functional status, and clinical and biochemical markers of liver dysfunction and portal hypertension, preoperative anemia was linked to a threefold increased risk of blood transfusion, a twofold increased risk of prolonged hospitalization, and higher healthcare costs in anemic patients. These findings suggest that anemia significantly impacts resource utilization in liver resection.

In a broader context, a study involving 227,425 patients from the ACS-NSQIP database who underwent major non-cardiac surgery reported that 30.4% of patients had preoperative anemia. The results showed that preoperative anemia was associated with increased morbidity and mortality within 30 days, even after adjusting for several known risk factors, including transfusions. Despite this evidence, there are limited studies specifically evaluating the impact of preoperative anemia on outcomes in specific surgeries, particularly liver resection.

The findings of this study could enhance physicians' understanding of the impact of preoperative anemia on postoperative outcomes, emphasizing the importance of its evaluation and treatment. Therefore, the assessment and management of preoperative anemia are essential components of patient blood management in liver resection. Proper assessment and timely intervention could mitigate associated risks and improve surgical outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Liver Resection Anemia Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Anemia group

The patients who had preoperative anemia (hemoglobin levels \< 12 g/dL in female and \< 13 g/dL in male) before liver resection

No interventions assigned to this group

No anemia group

The patients who did not have preoperative anemia before liver resection.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All genders, age 20 to 75 years old who undergoing elective liver resection
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I-III

Exclusion Criteria

* Living donor liver resection

Withdrawal criteria:

* Unresectable tumor
* Cardiac arrest during operation
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chiang Mai University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Warangkana Lapisatepun

Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Warangkana Lapisatepun, MD. PhD.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chiang Mai University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Warangkana Lapisatepun, MD. PhD.

Role: CONTACT

+66910688716

Worakitti Lapisatepun, MD.

Role: CONTACT

0910688761

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ANE-2568-0141

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.