Preoperative Anemia Affected to Postoperative Outcomes in Liver Resection
NCT ID: NCT06905041
Last Updated: 2025-04-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
728 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-03-31
2027-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Preoperative Evaluation of the Remaining Part of the Liver for Liver Resection
NCT04100304
Does a Minimally Invasive Approach to Liver Resection Improve Postoperative Outcomes?
NCT07169877
Longitudinal Outcomes in Hepatic Resection
NCT02997098
Prognostic Factors After Liver Transplantation
NCT05018741
Preoperative Edema is a Significant Risk Factor for Post-hepatectomy Complications
NCT06555510
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), anemia is defined as a hemoglobin concentration of less than 12 g/dL in nonpregnant women and less than 13 g/dL in men. The prevalence of preoperative anemia among surgical patients has been reported to be between 32% and 48%. Preoperative anemia is one of the most common medical conditions encountered in surgical patients, with a prevalence ranging from 20% to 45% depending on the type of surgery. Specifically, in hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery, 16.9% to 32.8% of patients present with anemia prior to surgery.
Preoperative anemia is a well-established predictor of the need for perioperative blood transfusions in liver resection, as supported by multiple studies. Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions are associated with numerous adverse outcomes, both short-term and long-term. These include transfusion reactions, increased rates of postoperative infections, cardiopulmonary and thromboembolic events, prolonged mechanical ventilation, re-operations, extended hospital and ICU stays, elevated postoperative morbidity, increased tumor recurrence, reduced disease-specific survival, and decreased overall survival.
A large retrospective study reported a prevalence of preoperative anemia at 32.8%, which was associated with higher rates of postoperative major morbidities and mortality. After adjusting for confounding factors-such as age, type of liver resection, ASA classification, preoperative laboratory results, comorbidities, functional status, and diagnosis-patients with preoperative anemia were found to have a 21% higher risk of developing major morbidities within 30 days (adjusted odds ratio 1.21, 1.09-1.33). These morbidities included organ space infections, sepsis, septic shock, prolonged postoperative ventilator use (\>48 hours), unplanned reintubation, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury requiring dialysis. However, preoperative anemia was not associated with increased postoperative mortality in liver resection (adjusted odds ratio 0.88, 0.66-1.16).
Furthermore, a retrospective study involving 4,170 patients demonstrated that preoperative anemia was associated with an increased risk of major postoperative complications compared to patients without anemia (24% versus 19%). After adjusting for confounders, including age, sex, race, obesity, extent of liver resection, comorbidities, functional status, and clinical and biochemical markers of liver dysfunction and portal hypertension, preoperative anemia was linked to a threefold increased risk of blood transfusion, a twofold increased risk of prolonged hospitalization, and higher healthcare costs in anemic patients. These findings suggest that anemia significantly impacts resource utilization in liver resection.
In a broader context, a study involving 227,425 patients from the ACS-NSQIP database who underwent major non-cardiac surgery reported that 30.4% of patients had preoperative anemia. The results showed that preoperative anemia was associated with increased morbidity and mortality within 30 days, even after adjusting for several known risk factors, including transfusions. Despite this evidence, there are limited studies specifically evaluating the impact of preoperative anemia on outcomes in specific surgeries, particularly liver resection.
The findings of this study could enhance physicians' understanding of the impact of preoperative anemia on postoperative outcomes, emphasizing the importance of its evaluation and treatment. Therefore, the assessment and management of preoperative anemia are essential components of patient blood management in liver resection. Proper assessment and timely intervention could mitigate associated risks and improve surgical outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Anemia group
The patients who had preoperative anemia (hemoglobin levels \< 12 g/dL in female and \< 13 g/dL in male) before liver resection
No interventions assigned to this group
No anemia group
The patients who did not have preoperative anemia before liver resection.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I-III
Exclusion Criteria
Withdrawal criteria:
* Unresectable tumor
* Cardiac arrest during operation
20 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chiang Mai University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Warangkana Lapisatepun
Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Warangkana Lapisatepun, MD. PhD.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chiang Mai University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ANE-2568-0141
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.