Early Myofascial Manual Treatment in Subjects With Spasticity Following Acquired Brain Injury

NCT ID: NCT06898242

Last Updated: 2025-04-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-13

Study Completion Date

2026-03-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Spasticity is characterized by an increase in muscle tone that is velocity-dependent and caused by the exaggeration of the stretch reflex. Clinically, it is found in 70-85% of patients with spinal cord injury at one year, 40-45% in patients with stroke at 12 months, and 25% in patients with traumatic brain injury at one year.

The term 'Severe Acquired Brain Injury' refers to a condition characterized by brain damage that causes a coma with an acute phase score of 8 on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), lasting more than 24 hours. It may be caused by vascular, traumatic, anoxic, infectious, toxic-metabolic, or neoplastic damage, which can cause multiple and complex sensory, cognitive, and behavioral impairments that lead to significant disability. Spasticity occurs frequently in patients with GCA, often at an early stage, with serious repercussions on the rehabilitation process and outcome.

Numerous studies indicate that spasticity due to neurological damage is supported, in addition to hyperexcitable stretch reflexes, by changes in the connective tissues of the peripheral limbs that increase muscle resistance to passive movement. After neurological damage, and starting 1 week after immobilization, alterations in the muscles and connective tissue can be observed: changes in the muscle fibers, changes in the collagen tissue, and changes in the properties of the tendons. It is believed that the quantitative and qualitative changes in the intramuscular connective tissue contribute to the deterioration of the properties and functions of the immobilized muscle, which contributes to the establishment and progression of spasticity.

In patients with spastic paresis, therapeutic interventions are intended to prevent prolonged shortening of the muscles and mobilize the affected areas. According to recent research, the connective tissue is particularly sensitive to mechanical stress, particularly deep manual manipulation and vibration. Several studies have suggested that myofascial release therapy can be a complementary treatment in patients with neurological disorders to reduce muscle spasticity and increase joint mobility.

Myofascial release techniques can be hypothesized to be a valid integrated treatment for spasticity in patients with sequelae from GCA, but their use in this area has been little studied and no studies have been conducted in the post-acute period of intensive hospitalization.

The purpose of the present study is to determine whether manual myofascial release techniques, applied to the upper and lower limbs, are safe, tolerable, and effective in modifying the degree of spasticity and improving functional activity in patients with GCA. Additionally, changes in muscle structure will be evaluated by ultrasound: cross-sectional area, anteroposterior diameter, and pennation angle.

Finally, we will measure the effects of manual myofascial treatment stimulation by measuring electrodermal activity (EDA), which is a non-invasive method in which an electrode bracelet is applied to the patient's right wrist to measure the electrical conductance of the skin, which is a function of the autonomic nervous system, which is controlled by the sweat glands. Various sensory stimulations, including visual, auditory, olfactory, tactile, vestibular, and proprioceptive stimulations, can produce a physical sensation that can influence the patient's sensorimotor output, resulting in physiological changes in the activity of the ANS as a consequence of the processing of sensory afferents. A response to an appropriate sensory stimulus can be regarded as a manifestation of a change in consciousness.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Brain Injury Brain Injury, Vascular Brain Injuries, Traumatic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A: rehabilitative treatment following rehabilitation project plus manual myofascial treatment

Partecipant in group A will perform normal rehabilitative treatment as foreseen by the rehabilitation project plus manual myofascial treatment on the upper and lower limbs with a frequency of 2 times a week for a maximum of 30 minutes for 4 weeks. In particular, on the upper limbs, manual myofascial treatment will be applied in all sessions to the intraosseous membrane and if necessary to the palmar fascia, and brachial fascia sites. On the lower limbs, it will be applied in all sessions to the intraosseous membrane and if necessary to the plantar fascia, and crural fascia sites.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Manual myofascial treatment direct to upper and lower limb

Intervention Type OTHER

Manual treatment direct specifically on fascia connective tissue

Rehabilitative treatment following rehabilitation project

Intervention Type OTHER

Intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for at least 180 minutes/day, 6 days a week, following rehabilitation project

Group B: rehabilitative treatment following rehabilitation project

Partecipant in group B will carry out the normal rehabilitation program, as foreseen by the rehabilitation project, for a total treatment time equal to that of the treated group.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rehabilitative treatment following rehabilitation project

Intervention Type OTHER

Intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for at least 180 minutes/day, 6 days a week, following rehabilitation project

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Manual myofascial treatment direct to upper and lower limb

Manual treatment direct specifically on fascia connective tissue

Intervention Type OTHER

Rehabilitative treatment following rehabilitation project

Intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for at least 180 minutes/day, 6 days a week, following rehabilitation project

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aquired brain injuries from 40 days to 6 months after the event
* Spasticity at upper orvlower limbs quantified at MAS scale \>= than 1
* Age \>= 18 years
* Patient/Caregiver ability to understand and sign the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Spasticity at MAS scale \> 2
* Non consolidatetd fracture and/or muscle injuries to the limbs
* Deep vein thrombosis
* Neoplasms
* Hemodynamic instability
* Local infections to the limbs
* Recent treatment with botulinum toxin (within 40 days)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

PADUA LUCA

associated professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luca Padua, MD, phD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UOC Neuroriabilitazione ad Alta Intensità COD. 75 Policlinico Gemelli

Roma, RM, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ozcakar L, Ata AM, Kaymak B, Kara M, Kumbhare D. Ultrasound imaging for sarcopenia, spasticity and painful muscle syndromes. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2018 Sep;12(3):373-381. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000354.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29912727 (View on PubMed)

Posada-Quintero HF, Chon KH. Innovations in Electrodermal Activity Data Collection and Signal Processing: A Systematic Review. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jan 15;20(2):479. doi: 10.3390/s20020479.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31952141 (View on PubMed)

Heckmatt JZ, Leeman S, Dubowitz V. Ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of muscle disease. J Pediatr. 1982 Nov;101(5):656-60. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(82)80286-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7131136 (View on PubMed)

Dietz V, Sinkjaer T. Spastic movement disorder: impaired reflex function and altered muscle mechanics. Lancet Neurol. 2007 Aug;6(8):725-33. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70193-X.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17638613 (View on PubMed)

Stecco C, Day JA. The fascial manipulation technique and its biomechanical model: a guide to the human fascial system. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2010 Mar 17;3(1):38-40. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v3i1.78. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21589701 (View on PubMed)

Trompetto C, Marinelli L, Mori L, Pelosin E, Curra A, Molfetta L, Abbruzzese G. Pathophysiology of spasticity: implications for neurorehabilitation. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:354906. doi: 10.1155/2014/354906. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25530960 (View on PubMed)

Hinz B. The myofibroblast: paradigm for a mechanically active cell. J Biomech. 2010 Jan 5;43(1):146-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.020. Epub 2009 Oct 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19800625 (View on PubMed)

Stecco A, Pirri C, Caro R, Raghavan P. Stiffness and echogenicity: Development of a stiffness-echogenicity matrix for clinical problem solving. Eur J Transl Myol. 2019 Sep 12;29(3):8476. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2019.8476. eCollection 2019 Aug 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31579488 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

6661

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.