Effect of Joint Mobilization on Alpha Motoneuron Reflex Excitability

NCT ID: NCT01153022

Last Updated: 2010-06-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-02-29

Study Completion Date

2009-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective: To determine the effect of ankle joint mobilization on the alpha motoneuron reflex excitability of the soleus muscle in people with spasticity.

Subjects and Methods: A controlled clinical trial with crossover design and simple masking was conducted in 24 randomized subjects to initiate the control or experimental group. Traction and rhythmic oscillation were applied for five minutes to the ankle joint. Alpha motoneuron reflex excitability was assessed by measuring H wave amplitude (Hoffmann reflex - H reflex), stimulating the tibial nerve at the level of the popliteal fossa and recording in the soleus muscle. In each subject 12 measurements were taken: basal rate, during and after mobilization. Changes in alpha motoneuron reflex excitability were calculated in relation to basal measurement. For each measurement a hypothesis test was performed (Student t test).

Results: In groups of patients with brain injury (BI) and incomplete spinal cord injury (ISCI), a significant difference was found between measurements of both studies, concerning variation in alpha motoneuron reflex excitability during the application of joint mobilization techniques, with a decrease in the experimental group and an increase in the control group. In contrast, no significant differences were found after mobilization therapy. Patients with complete spinal cord injury (CSCI) showed no significant differences in any measurements.

Conclusion: We demonstrate the effectiveness of passive movement in the decrease of muscle tone during the mobilization maneuver in patients with BI or ISCI, but no residual effect after completion of the trial. This research project showed no evidence regarding spasticity reduction in complete spinal cord injuries. This suggests that therapeutic interventions to decrease muscle tone, based on the passive exercise and stimulation of proprioceptors should be reconsidered.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Muscle Spasticity Spinal Cord Injury Stroke Craniocerebral Trauma

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Musculoskeletal manipulations Muscle spasticity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

joint mobilization techniques

In the experimental group, ankle joint mobilization was applied for five minutes, using grade II joint traction rhythmic oscillation (Mailland Scale) with the knee in 15° of flexion, subtalar in neutral and ankle in resting position (10º plantarflexion). During the control study, participants were placed under the same conditions as those of the experimental group but only the hands of the evaluator were placed in the foot, in the position of joint traction simulation.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* people over 18 years old
* spasticity acquired after five years of age
* any etiology
* any location of the injury

Patients were instructed not to consume coffee, cigarettes or energy drinks 24 hours prior to the study nor participate in excessive physical exercise during the day.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Autónoma de Manizales, Colombia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Universidad Autónoma de Manizales

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Julio E Pérez, Master

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidad Autónoma de Manizales

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UAM

Manizales, Caldas Department, Colombia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Colombia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CT01UAM-H reflex

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id