Medical Spastic Patient Machine Interface MSPMI : Biomechanical and Electrophysiological Assessment of the Triceps Surae Spasticity

NCT ID: NCT03307135

Last Updated: 2020-11-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

67 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-10

Study Completion Date

2020-03-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Spasticity is a disorder of the muscular tonus that occurs in disease including the upper motor neuron (strokes, spinal cord injuries, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injuries or cerebral palsies). It begins few hours after the neural aggression and last until the grave.

The most accepted definition refers to a velocity-dependent increase in stretch reflexes elicited by passive stretch (Lance definition) but new approaches prefers to distinguish neural (reflex) and non-neural (soft tissues alterations) components of the increase resistance to a passive stretch. This deficiency is a major cause of complications as walking impairment, pain or bone deformities and may require intensive therapies (intrathecal baclofen infusion, intramuscular toxin botulinium injection, surgery, etc). Despite its high frequency and the potential complications, only clinical scales (modified Ashworth scale and modified Tardieu scale essentially) with criticized metrological properties are available for daily assessment. The SPASM Consortium has published on 2005 recommendations for developing devices using both mechanical and electrophysiological parameters. The principle challenge was to ally parameters accuracy and utilization facility allowing quickly evaluation to the patient's bed. Few research team works on this topic but mostly on specific population and nowadays, no device has really crossed the door of laboratories.

This kind of tool would help us to improve the quality of the follow-up and to guide us between the choices of specific therapies.

The MSPMI has been created following these recommendations in the University of Technology of Compiègne, thanks to the collaboration between researchers of the UMR 7338 CNRS and a brain surgeon of the Nantes University Hospital. The patent was obtained on 2012. This device allows the assessment of the ankle plantar extensor (triceps surae) during a manually applied stretch movement. This muscle was selected as it is frequently involved and treated for spasticity.

This study aims to evaluate the metrological properties of the MSPMI (reliabilities, responsiveness, known group validity, construct validity, measurement errors and internal consistency) among a large cohort of patients with no restriction of etiologies recruited in the Nantes University Hospital.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Evaluation will include medical histories and specific information about spasticity management and consequences. The patient will be assessed by two evaluators with the MSPMI installed on the foot and the shank. MSPMI allows the record of angular movement of the ankle (position, speed and acceleration), of biomechanics (stiffness, torque, work and power) and electromyography (root mean squared and integrated electromyography signals) of two chiefs of the triceps surae (medial gastrocnemius and soleus). Electromyography data will be recorded on a maximum voluntary contraction when the deficiency will permit it. After that, data will be recorded at 3 velocities (with respect to the clinical scale recommendations) on two different positions (knee flexed and extended), according to our clinical practice. The evaluation on day 0 will allow the assessment of inter-rater intra-session reproductibility, internal consistency, construct validity, measurement error and known group validity. If the patient is hospitalized, he will be included on the "hospitalization group" and a second evaluation following the same protocol will be done 7 days later (assessment of inter and intra-rater inter-session reproductibility). If a specific therapy (selective tibial neurotomy, anesthetic block or botulinum toxin intramuscular injection) is proposed, the patient will be included on the "treatment group" and a new evaluation will be done after the therapy (30 minutes - 2 hours after an anesthetic block, 2-3 months after neurotomy or botulinium toxin injection) allowing assessment of the responsiveness of the MSPMI. If the patient is not on these two situations, he will be included on the "simple evaluation group" and his participation will end.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spasticity, Muscle

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Spasticity electrophysiology biomechanics objective assessment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Simple Assessment group

Intervention is a single evaluation with the MSPMI by two evaluators.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

single assessment with the MSPMI

Intervention Type DEVICE

Manually applied stretch with the MSPMI installed on the foot and shank at 3 different velocities on 2 positions (knee flexed and extended)

Hospitalization group

Evaluation with the MSPMI by two evaluators on two consultations separate by a 7 days interval.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

double assessment with the MSPMI with 7 days of interval

Intervention Type DEVICE

Manually applied stretch with the MSPMI installed on the foot and shank at 3 different velocities on 2 positions (knee flexed and extended)

Treatment group

Evaluation with the MSPMI by two evaluators before and after specific therapies proposed on our usual practices (Selective tibial neurotomy, anesthetic block or botulinum toxin intramuscular injection).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

double assessment with the MSPMI before and after treatment

Intervention Type DEVICE

Manually applied stretch with the MSPMI installed on the foot and shank at 3 different velocities on 2 positions (knee flexed and extended)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

single assessment with the MSPMI

Manually applied stretch with the MSPMI installed on the foot and shank at 3 different velocities on 2 positions (knee flexed and extended)

Intervention Type DEVICE

double assessment with the MSPMI with 7 days of interval

Manually applied stretch with the MSPMI installed on the foot and shank at 3 different velocities on 2 positions (knee flexed and extended)

Intervention Type DEVICE

double assessment with the MSPMI before and after treatment

Manually applied stretch with the MSPMI installed on the foot and shank at 3 different velocities on 2 positions (knee flexed and extended)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Spasticity with respect to the Lance defintion (minimal score of 1 on the modified Ashworth scale)

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindication of ankle manipulation : fracture, phlebitis, bedsore
* amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Compiègne University of Technology

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nantes University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brigitte Perrouin-Verbe, PU-PH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nantes CHU

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Médecine Physique et Réadaptation Neurologique

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bar-On L, Aertbelien E, Molenaers G, Van Campenhout A, Vandendoorent B, Nieuwenhuys A, Jaspers E, Hunaerts C, Desloovere K. Instrumented assessment of the effect of Botulinum Toxin-A in the medial hamstrings in children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2014 Jan;39(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.05.018. Epub 2013 Jun 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23791154 (View on PubMed)

Bar-On L, Van Campenhout A, Desloovere K, Aertbelien E, Huenaerts C, Vandendoorent B, Nieuwenhuys A, Molenaers G. Is an instrumented spasticity assessment an improvement over clinical spasticity scales in assessing and predicting the response to integrated botulinum toxin type a treatment in children with cerebral palsy? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3):515-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Aug 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23994052 (View on PubMed)

de Vlugt E, de Groot JH, Schenkeveld KE, Arendzen JH, van der Helm FC, Meskers CG. The relation between neuromechanical parameters and Ashworth score in stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010 Jul 27;7:35. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-7-35.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20663189 (View on PubMed)

Schless SH, Desloovere K, Aertbelien E, Molenaers G, Huenaerts C, Bar-On L. The Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of an Instrumented Spasticity Assessment in Children with Cerebral Palsy. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 2;10(7):e0131011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131011. eCollection 2015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26134673 (View on PubMed)

Gaverth J, Sandgren M, Lindberg PG, Forssberg H, Eliasson AC. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability of a method to measure wrist and finger spasticity. J Rehabil Med. 2013 Jul;45(7):630-6. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1160.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23695917 (View on PubMed)

Turk R, Notley SV, Pickering RM, Simpson DM, Wright PA, Burridge JH. Reliability and sensitivity of a wrist rig to measure motor control and spasticity in poststroke hemiplegia. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(6):684-96. doi: 10.1177/1545968308315599. Epub 2008 Sep 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18776066 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RC17_0028

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id