Comparing the Assessment Accuracy Between Submental Ultrasound and Speech Therapists in Nasogastric Tube Removal
NCT ID: NCT06877897
Last Updated: 2026-01-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-02-04
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants will undergo both submental ultrasound (SUS) and speech-language pathologists (SLP) assessments and will be randomly assigned to either the SUS group or the SLP group for further evaluation.
The SUS group will follow an oral feeding and tube removal training protocol based on submental ultrasound criteria for swallowing function (maximum hyoid bone displacement ≥ 1.38 cm). The SLP group will follow similar training protocols based on the speech-language pathologist's clinical assessment.
Researchers will compare outcomes such as nasogastric tube removal rate, vital signs, basic laboratory data, hyoid bone displacement on ultrasound, choking and aspiration rates, success rates of training protocols, and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores to determine if SUS is a reliable assessment method for swallowing function and NG tube removal.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
SURE Trial: Swallowing Ultrasound Reliability Evaluation Trial
NCT07098767
Ultrasound Evaluation of Tongue Movements in Speech and Swallowing
NCT00001167
To Evaluate Oral Phase Swallowing Function Using Submental Ultrasound
NCT00752349
Diagnostic Accuracy of Aerodigestive Ultrasound for Predicting Swallowing Disorders
NCT04800783
Gastric Ultrasound in Tube Fed Intubated Patients
NCT04612348
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SUS group
The SUS group follows an oral feeding diet and tube removal training protocol based on submental ultrasound criteria, with a maximum hyoid bone displacement of ≥ 1.38 cm as an indicator of swallowing function.
Submental ultrasound criteria
According to the submental ultrasound criteria, a maximum hyoid bone displacement of ≥1.38 cm is required in the swallowing function assessment to qualify for the oral feeding diet and tube removal training protocol.
SLP group
The SLP group follows an oral feeding diet and tube removal training protocol based on the speech-language pathologist's assessment of swallowing function, which includes evaluating sensory and motor functions of the oral and facial muscles, phonation, swallowing motion, and other relevant factors.
Routine swallowing function assessment of speech-language pathologist
The speech-language pathologist (SLP) assessment includes the evaluation of sensory and motor functions of the oral and facial muscles, phonation, swallowing motion, and other relevant factors.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Submental ultrasound criteria
According to the submental ultrasound criteria, a maximum hyoid bone displacement of ≥1.38 cm is required in the swallowing function assessment to qualify for the oral feeding diet and tube removal training protocol.
Routine swallowing function assessment of speech-language pathologist
The speech-language pathologist (SLP) assessment includes the evaluation of sensory and motor functions of the oral and facial muscles, phonation, swallowing motion, and other relevant factors.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients using a nasogastric tube
* Patients with a nasogastric tube placed due to acute conditions, such as increased oxygen demand, temporary loss of consciousness, or other illnesses causing weakness and a risk of aspiration. After treatment, there is no longer any indication for continued nasogastric tube placement.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with long-term nasogastric tube placement
* Patients requiring a high-concentration oxygen mask or mechanical ventilation with intubation
* Patients with significant drooling or frequent aspiration of saliva
* Patients who have undergone oral or head and neck surgery
* Patients who have received radiation therapy for the head and neck
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Taiwan University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Chin-Chung Shu, Doctor of Clinical Medicine
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
National Taiwan University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hsu CY, Lai JN, Kung WM, Hung CH, Yip HT, Chang YC, Wei CY. Nationwide Prevalence and Outcomes of Long-Term Nasogastric Tube Placement in Adults. Nutrients. 2022 Apr 22;14(9):1748. doi: 10.3390/nu14091748.
Lee YS, Lee KE, Kang Y, Yi TI, Kim JS. Usefulness of Submental Ultrasonographic Evaluation for Dysphagia Patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016 Apr;40(2):197-205. doi: 10.5535/arm.2016.40.2.197. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
Allen JE, Clunie GM, Winiker K. Ultrasound: an emerging modality for the dysphagia assessment toolkit? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jun 1;29(3):213-218. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000708.
Hsiao MY, Chang YC, Chen WS, Chang HY, Wang TG. Application of ultrasonography in assessing oropharyngeal dysphagia in stroke patients. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012 Sep;38(9):1522-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.04.017. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202411050RINC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.