UltraSound for Accurate Decisions in Chest PhysioTherapy

NCT ID: NCT02881814

Last Updated: 2023-09-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

153 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-02

Study Completion Date

2024-04-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Introduction: Physiotherapist usually uses a clinical examination, including auscultation, an analysis of blood gasses and chest imaging to determine the indication for chest physiotherapy, to choose the treatment protocol and evaluate the efficacy of the management. Lung ultrasound (LUS) presents greater accuracy than chest X-ray in the diagnosis of lung deficiencies interesting the physiotherapist. So, it could allow the physiotherapist to determine the indication for chest physiotherapy and thus avoid unnecessary or inappropriate treatments. No study has evaluated the impact of LUS on clinical decisions in chest physiotherapy in ICU patients.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of using the results of lung and diaphragm US on clinical decisions in chest physiotherapy in hypoxemic patients hospitalized in ICU.

Method: The physiotherapist carries out a clinical examination and analyses the complementary tests (chest X-ray, chest CT-scan and blood gasses if available). Following the examination, he will put forward one or several hypotheses concerning the respiratory deficiency and will confirm or not the indication for chest physiotherapy. If respiratory physiotherapy is indicated, the physiotherapist will specify the protocol.

A lung and diaphragm US will be done following the evaluation of the clinical physiotherapist, and will make it possible to answer the question: are the results of the lung and diaphragm US compatible with the hypotheses put forward? The LUS report will be given to the clinical physiotherapist. He will specify the respiratory physiotherapy protocol according to the results of the US-scan.

The modification of the clinical decision will be assessed with the Net Reclassification Index (NRI).

Expected results: We expect that decisions for chest physiotherapy will be modified by LUS. The expected benefit for patients is therefore that they will be given a chest physiotherapy protocol that is better suited to the type of respiratory deficiency they are suffering from.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Research hypothesis The lung and diaphragm ultrasound findings provided to the physiotherapist will modify his/her clinical decision-making in regards to chest physiotherapy treatment in the critical care patient.

Objectives Principal objective The principal objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of using the results of lung and diaphragm US on clinical decisions by physiotherapists regarding chest physiotherapy in patients hospitalized in an ICU.

Secondary objectives

1. Determine the accuracy of physiotherapist diagnosis of lung pathology using routine clinical assessment versus LUS findings;
2. Determine the frequency of change in chest physiotherapy treatment with the addition of LUS results to clinical assessment;
3. Determine the frequency of change in medical treatment (determined by intensivist) following the addition of LUS results to clinical assessment findings.
4. Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of LUS in predicting duration of mechanical ventilation and mortality.

Methodology:

Type of study This is a multi-centre prospective (patients enrolled on admission) interventional study evaluating a routine assessment/treatment. The study intends to assess the impact of lung and diaphragm ultrasound on the usual physiotherapist's clinical decision-making process. Each included patient will be clinically assessed by a clinical physiotherapist, and then will have a lung and diaphragm ultrasound by another physiotherapist/operator blinded to the clinical assessment findings. The lung and diaphragm ultrasound findings will then be presented to both the intensivist and clinical physiotherapist to evaluate the impact on the independent clinical decision-making by both the intensivist and physiotherapist.

Data collections

The following data will be collected:

* Demographic: age, sex, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, history of cirrhosis, diabetes or a chronic respiratory disease, heart failure;
* Reason for hospitalization, medical diagnosis if different;
* Treatments: hypnotics, opiates, steroids and anti-hypertensives, oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, NIV, tracheotomy;
* Duration of mechanical ventilation
* Duration of ICU stay
* Vital signs: RR, HR, PA, SpO2, RASS, Glasgow;
* Clinical hypotheses of the clinical physiotherapist;
* LUS findings;
* Choice of chest physiotherapy protocol (before and after ultrasonography).

Nature of the routine care to be evaluated Procedure 1: Decision-making process in chest physiotherapy The clinical physiotherapist is the physiotherapist who manages patients in the CCU.

As soon as chest physiotherapy is prescribed, the physiotherapist carries out a clinical examination and analyses the complementary tests (chest X-ray, chest CT-scan and blood gasses if available). He/she also consults the patient's medical record to find out the reason for admission to the CCU and the medical diagnosis if the critical care physician has made one. Following the examination, he/she will put forward one or several hypotheses concerning the respiratory deficiency (and not the disease - medical diagnosis) and will confirm or not the indication for chest physiotherapy. If respiratory physiotherapy is indicated, the physiotherapist will specify the protocol.

A lung and diaphragm US will be done (see below) following the evaluation of the clinical physiotherapist, and will make it possible to answer the question: are the results of the lung and diaphragm US compatible with the hypotheses put forward? The LUS report will be given to the clinical physiotherapist. It will specify the respiratory physiotherapy protocol according to the results of the US-scan.

Procedure 2: lung and diaphragm US The LUS will be performed by the physiotherapist/operator, who will be blinded to the clinical evaluation of the clinical physiotherapist and the patient's status. The operator will not take part in the management of the patients concerned. The semiology of lung and diaphragm US is described. The following syndromes will be searched for: normal profile, alveolar-interstitial syndrome, pulmonary consolidation, pleural effusion, pneumothorax and diaphragm dysfunction. The physiotherapist/operator will write a detailed LUS-scan report, which will be given to the clinical physiotherapist. It will include the LUS diagnosis and describe the signs observed in the different regions of the chest. The clinical physiotherapist is trained to interpret LUS reports.

In case of mechanically ventilated patient at St. Vincent Hospital (Sydney, Australia), LUS scan will be performed immediately following intubation. Additionnal LUS scans will be performed 72h after intubation and Immediately prior to or following extubation.

Number of patients to recruit and duration of participation for each patient Given the high prevalence of hypoxemia in ICUs, the systematic respiratory assessment in these patients by the physiotherapist and our relatively non-restrictive inclusion criteria, we believe we can recruit more than 300 patients per year.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness Respiratory Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lung ultrasound and clinical decision

Clinical assessment and choice of chest physiotherapy treatmetn performed by the clinical physiotherapist, followed by a comprehensive lung and diaphragm ultrasonography. After ultrasonography, the clinical physiotherapist is asked what CPT treatment he was going finally to implement, and explain the reasons for change, if any.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lung and diaphragm ultrasound

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The ultrasound physiotherapist/operator performs a lung and diaphragm ultrasound. He is blinded to the patient's status and clinical physiotherapist examination. He/she is not involved in patient management or patient clinical decision-making. The ultrasound findings are recorded in the LUS report. The LUS report is reported to the clinical physiotherapist and to the intensivist. The ultrasound diagnosis(es) is recorded.

Mechanically ventilated patients

In case of mechanically ventilated patient at St. Vincent Hospital (Sydney, Australia), LUS scan will be performed immediately following intubation. Additionnal LUS scans will be performed 72h after intubation and Immediately prior to or following extubation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lung and diaphragm ultrasound

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The ultrasound physiotherapist/operator performs a lung and diaphragm ultrasound. He is blinded to the patient's status and clinical physiotherapist examination. He/she is not involved in patient management or patient clinical decision-making. The ultrasound findings are recorded in the LUS report. The LUS report is reported to the clinical physiotherapist and to the intensivist. The ultrasound diagnosis(es) is recorded.

Lung and diaphragm ultrasound in MV patients

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

In case of mechanically ventilated patient at St. Vincent Hospital (Sydney, Australia), LUS scan will be performed immediately following intubation. Additionnal LUS scans will be performed 72h after intubation and Immediately prior to or following extubation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lung and diaphragm ultrasound

The ultrasound physiotherapist/operator performs a lung and diaphragm ultrasound. He is blinded to the patient's status and clinical physiotherapist examination. He/she is not involved in patient management or patient clinical decision-making. The ultrasound findings are recorded in the LUS report. The LUS report is reported to the clinical physiotherapist and to the intensivist. The ultrasound diagnosis(es) is recorded.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Lung and diaphragm ultrasound in MV patients

In case of mechanically ventilated patient at St. Vincent Hospital (Sydney, Australia), LUS scan will be performed immediately following intubation. Additionnal LUS scans will be performed 72h after intubation and Immediately prior to or following extubation.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Hypoxemia(SpO2/FiO2\< 315 (15))(indication for chest physiotherapy)(cf. annexe 1);
* Medical prescription for chest physiotherapy;
* First session of chest physiotherapy;
* Chest X-ray\<12h available;
* Physiotherapist/operator qualified in LUS available;
* Patient's consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of a contra-indication for chest physiotherapy;
* Absence of hypoxemia;
* Absence of a prescription for chest physiotherapy;
* Absence of a chest X-ray \< 12h from the time of physiotherapy assessment;
* Physiotherapist/operator qualified in LUS not available;
* Lung and diaphragm US not possible (surgical emphysema, dressing, scarring, drains etc.);
* Refusal of the patient or a relative to participate in the study;
* Patients to be discharged on the day of the study;
* Patients in palliative care;
* Withdrawal/limitations of medical care with impending death.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hopital Forcilles

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Belaid Bouhemad, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

Aymeric Le Neindre, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hopital Forcilles

George Ntoumenopoulos, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St Vincent's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St Vincent's Hospital

Sydney, , Australia

Site Status

CHU de Dijon

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Forcilles

Férolles-Attilly, , France

Site Status

Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

Paris, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Xirouchaki N, Georgopoulos D. Impact of lung ultrasound on clinical decision making in critically ill patients: response to O'Connor et al. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul;40(7):1063. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3316-6. Epub 2014 May 6. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24797688 (View on PubMed)

Le Neindre A, Mongodi S, Philippart F, Bouhemad B. Thoracic ultrasound: Potential new tool for physiotherapists in respiratory management. A narrative review. J Crit Care. 2016 Feb;31(1):101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.10.014. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26613650 (View on PubMed)

Leech M, Bissett B, Kot M, Ntoumenopoulos G. Lung ultrasound for critical care physiotherapists: a narrative review. Physiother Res Int. 2015 Jun;20(2):69-76. doi: 10.1002/pri.1607. Epub 2014 Dec 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25545613 (View on PubMed)

Le Neindre A, Hansell L, Wormser J, Gomes Lopes A, Diaz Lopez C, Romanet C, Choukroun G, Nguyen M, Philippart F, Guinot PG, Buscher H, Bouhemad B, Ntoumenopoulos G. Thoracic ultrasound influences physiotherapist's clinical decision-making in respiratory management of critical care patients: a multicentre cohort study. Thorax. 2023 Feb;78(2):169-175. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218217. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35321941 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

US-ADEPT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.