Lung Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Pneumothorax Size

NCT ID: NCT01572584

Last Updated: 2013-12-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

115 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-12-31

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background

* Assessment of the percentage of lung collapse is crucial in the therapeutic decision-making of pneumothorax.
* The methods normally used to this purpose are radiological. Computerized tomography scan (CT) is highly accurate because it allows the exact evaluation of the volume of the air layer. However, in clinical practice assessment of the volume of pneumothorax mainly relies on the measurement of the inter-pleural distance at conventional chest radiography (CXR). This latter method is inaccurate.
* Lung ultrasound is a new method highly accurate in the first diagnosis of pneumothorax, with a sensitivity superior to CXR and similar to CT in case of traumatic pneumothorax.
* The scientific community is actually debating about the usefulness of lung ultrasound in the quantification of pneumothorax \[\]. Lung ultrasound can assess the superficial extension of the pneumothorax, but cannot evaluate its volume.

Aim

* Main purpose of the study is to compare measurement of the superficial extension of pneumothorax on the chest wall obtained by lung ultrasound, to the evaluation of the air volume performed by CT in patients with pneumothorax.
* The main hypothesis of the study is that the cut-off between small (\<11% of lung collapse) and large (\>11% of lung collapse) pneumothorax can be identified by a lung ultrasound evaluation of the superficial extension of pneumothorax.
* Second purpose of the study is to compare the accuracies of lung ultrasound and CXR in predicting the volume of pneumothorax assessed by CT.
* Secondary hypothesis is that lung ultrasound demonstrates greater accuracy in the prediction of volume of pneumothorax and percentage of lung collapse.

Methods

* Patients with a diagnosis of pneumothorax confirmed at CT are prospectively enrolled and submitted to lung ultrasound within 20 min from the CT study.
* Different locations of the sonographic "lung point" on the chest wall (i.e. the point on the chest wall where the sonographic pattern of the normally aerated lung alternates with the pathologic sonographic pattern of pneumothorax) are compared with different volumes of pneumothorax measured by CT.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pneumothorax

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Pneumothorax Lung ultrasound Chest sonography

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Radiologic diagnosis of pneumothorax
* Clinical need to perform a CT scan
* Ability to perform the lung ultrasound imaging within 20 minutes from the CT study

Exclusion Criteria

* age less than 16 years
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Giovanni Volpicelli

Medical Doctor, Department of Emergency Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Giovanni Volpicelli, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital

Orbassano, Torino, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Blaivas M, Lyon M, Duggal S. A prospective comparison of supine chest radiography and bedside ultrasound for the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Sep;12(9):844-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.05.005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16141018 (View on PubMed)

Soldati G, Testa A, Sher S, Pignataro G, La Sala M, Silveri NG. Occult traumatic pneumothorax: diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasonography in the emergency department. Chest. 2008 Jan;133(1):204-11. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1595. Epub 2007 Oct 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17925411 (View on PubMed)

Reissig A, Kroegel C. Accuracy of transthoracic sonography in excluding post-interventional pneumothorax and hydropneumothorax. Comparison to chest radiography. Eur J Radiol. 2005 Mar;53(3):463-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.04.014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15741021 (View on PubMed)

Lichtenstein D, Meziere G, Biderman P, Gepner A. The "lung point": an ultrasound sign specific to pneumothorax. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Oct;26(10):1434-40. doi: 10.1007/s001340000627.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11126253 (View on PubMed)

Baumann MH, Strange C, Heffner JE, Light R, Kirby TJ, Klein J, Luketich JD, Panacek EA, Sahn SA; AACP Pneumothorax Consensus Group. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: an American College of Chest Physicians Delphi consensus statement. Chest. 2001 Feb;119(2):590-602. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.2.590.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11171742 (View on PubMed)

Engdahl O, Toft T, Boe J. Chest radiograph--a poor method for determining the size of a pneumothorax. Chest. 1993 Jan;103(1):26-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.103.1.26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8417891 (View on PubMed)

Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Lichtenstein DA, Mathis G, Kirkpatrick AW, Melniker L, Gargani L, Noble VE, Via G, Dean A, Tsung JW, Soldati G, Copetti R, Bouhemad B, Reissig A, Agricola E, Rouby JJ, Arbelot C, Liteplo A, Sargsyan A, Silva F, Hoppmann R, Breitkreutz R, Seibel A, Neri L, Storti E, Petrovic T; International Liaison Committee on Lung Ultrasound (ILC-LUS) for International Consensus Conference on Lung Ultrasound (ICC-LUS). International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Apr;38(4):577-91. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2513-4. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22392031 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SLG-181/2011

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id