Safety Study of Musculoskeletal Ultrasonographic to Assess Disabilities Arm of Head and Neck Cancer Patient
NCT ID: NCT02369276
Last Updated: 2018-05-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
38 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-04-30
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Real-time and Computerized Sonographic Reporting System in Predicting Malignant Cervical Lymphadenopathy
NCT01130402
Ultrasound-Guided Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Malignant Cervical Lymphadenopathies
NCT01384357
High Definition Ultrasound Imaging of the Intermuscular Bridges at the Interscalene Groove
NCT04547270
Combining MRI and CEUS to Diagnose Small Cervical Lymph Node Metastases in NPC Patients
NCT05389306
Neck Ultrasound by Respiratory Physicians in Patients With Lung Cancer
NCT03970564
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
post SND within 3 months
20 Head and Neck Cancer(HNC) complicated with ipsilateral shoulder disability post SND within 3 months, evaluate the soft tissue of shoulder girdle with musculoskeletal ultrasonography and elastography, compare the finding in each group and the range of motion of their shoulder, the severity of wing scapula, visual pain analog scale and the score of The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
ultrasonography and elastography
Evaluate the soft tissue of shoulder girdle with musculoskeletal ultrasonography and elastography, compare the finding in each group and the range of motion of their shoulder, the severity of wing scapula, visual pain analog scale and the score of The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
post SND within >3- 6months
20 Head and Neck Cancer(HNC) complicated with ipsilateral shoulder disability post SND within \>3- 6months, evaluate the soft tissue of shoulder girdle with musculoskeletal ultrasonography and elastography, compare the finding in each group and the range of motion of their shoulder, the severity of wing scapula, visual pain analog scale and the score of The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
ultrasonography and elastography
Evaluate the soft tissue of shoulder girdle with musculoskeletal ultrasonography and elastography, compare the finding in each group and the range of motion of their shoulder, the severity of wing scapula, visual pain analog scale and the score of The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
post SND within 6 months -1 year
20 Head and Neck Cancer(HNC) complicated with ipsilateral shoulder disability post SND within 6 months -1 year, evaluate the soft tissue of shoulder girdle with musculoskeletal ultrasonography and elastography, compare the finding in each group and the range of motion of their shoulder, the severity of wing scapula, visual pain analog scale and the score of The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
ultrasonography and elastography
Evaluate the soft tissue of shoulder girdle with musculoskeletal ultrasonography and elastography, compare the finding in each group and the range of motion of their shoulder, the severity of wing scapula, visual pain analog scale and the score of The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
post SND within more than 1 year
20 Head and Neck Cancer(HNC) complicated with ipsilateral shoulder disability post SND within more than 1 year, evaluate the soft tissue of shoulder girdle with musculoskeletal ultrasonography and elastography, compare the finding in each group and the range of motion of their shoulder, the severity of wing scapula, visual pain analog scale and the score of The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
ultrasonography and elastography
Evaluate the soft tissue of shoulder girdle with musculoskeletal ultrasonography and elastography, compare the finding in each group and the range of motion of their shoulder, the severity of wing scapula, visual pain analog scale and the score of The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
without shoulder disability
20 Head and Neck Cancer(HNC) post SND without shoulder complication at the control group, evaluate the soft tissue of shoulder girdle with musculoskeletal ultrasonography and elastography, compare the finding in each group and the range of motion of their shoulder, the severity of wing scapula, visual pain analog scale and the score of The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
ultrasonography and elastography
Evaluate the soft tissue of shoulder girdle with musculoskeletal ultrasonography and elastography, compare the finding in each group and the range of motion of their shoulder, the severity of wing scapula, visual pain analog scale and the score of The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ultrasonography and elastography
Evaluate the soft tissue of shoulder girdle with musculoskeletal ultrasonography and elastography, compare the finding in each group and the range of motion of their shoulder, the severity of wing scapula, visual pain analog scale and the score of The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Chau-Peng Leong, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, Niaonsung Hsiang, Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Snow GB, Annyas AA, van Slooten EA, Bartelink H, Hart AA. Prognostic factors of neck node metastasis. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1982 Jun;7(3):185-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1982.tb01581.x.
Leemans CR, Tiwari R, Nauta JJ, van der Waal I, Snow GB. Recurrence at the primary site in head and neck cancer and the significance of neck lymph node metastases as a prognostic factor. Cancer. 1994 Jan 1;73(1):187-90. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940101)73:13.0.co;2-j.
Carenfelt C, Eliasson K. Occurrence, duration and prognosis of unexpected accessory nerve paresis in radical neck dissection. Acta Otolaryngol. 1980 Nov-Dec;90(5-6):470-3. doi: 10.3109/00016488009131750.
Hillel AD, Kroll H, Dorman J, Medieros J. Radical neck dissection: a subjective and objective evaluation of postoperative disability. J Otolaryngol. 1989 Feb;18(1):53-61.
Terrell JE, Welsh DE, Bradford CR, Chepeha DB, Esclamado RM, Hogikyan ND, Wolf GT. Pain, quality of life, and spinal accessory nerve status after neck dissection. Laryngoscope. 2000 Apr;110(4):620-6. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200004000-00016.
Gordon SL, Graham WP 3rd, Black JT, Miller SH. Acessory nerve function after surgical procedures in the posterior triangle. Arch Surg. 1977 Mar;112(3):264-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1977.01370030036005.
Sobol S, Jensen C, Sawyer W 2nd, Costiloe P, Thong N. Objective comparison of physical dysfunction after neck dissection. Am J Surg. 1985 Oct;150(4):503-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(85)90164-3.
Leipzig B, Suen JY, English JL, Barnes J, Hooper M. Functional evaluation of the spinal accessory nerve after neck dissection. Am J Surg. 1983 Oct;146(4):526-30. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(83)90246-5.
Short SO, Kaplan JN, Laramore GE, Cummings CW. Shoulder pain and function after neck dissection with or without preservation of the spinal accessory nerve. Am J Surg. 1984 Oct;148(4):478-82. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90373-8.
El Ghani F, Van Den Brekel MW, De Goede CJ, Kuik J, Leemans CR, Smeele LE. Shoulder function and patient well-being after various types of neck dissections. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002 Oct;27(5):403-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00604.x.
Inoue H, Nibu K, Saito M, Otsuki N, Ishida H, Onitsuka T, Fujii T, Kawabata K, Saikawa M. Quality of life after neck dissection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Jun;132(6):662-6. doi: 10.1001/archotol.132.6.662.
Cheng PT, Hao SP, Lin YH, Yeh AR. Objective comparison of shoulder dysfunction after three neck dissection techniques. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000 Aug;109(8 Pt 1):761-6. doi: 10.1177/000348940010900811.
Kuntz AL, Weymuller EA Jr. Impact of neck dissection on quality of life. Laryngoscope. 1999 Aug;109(8):1334-8. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199908000-00030.
Guldiken Y, Orhan KS, Demirel T, Ural HI, Yucel EA, Deger K. Assessment of shoulder impairment after functional neck dissection: long term results. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2005 Dec;32(4):387-91. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2005.05.007. Epub 2005 Aug 1.
van Wilgen CP, Dijkstra PU, van der Laan BF, Plukker JT, Roodenburg JL. Shoulder and neck morbidity in quality of life after surgery for head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2004 Oct;26(10):839-44. doi: 10.1002/hed.20052.
van Wouwe M, de Bree R, Kuik DJ, de Goede CJ, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Doornaert P, Leemans CR. Shoulder morbidity after non-surgical treatment of the neck. Radiother Oncol. 2009 Feb;90(2):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.11.003. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
Tsuji T, Tanuma A, Onitsuka T, Ebihara M, Iida Y, Kimura A, Liu M. Electromyographic findings after different selective neck dissections. Laryngoscope. 2007 Feb;117(2):319-22. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000249781.20989.5c.
Ferlito A, Johnson JT, Rinaldo A, Pratt LW, Fagan JJ, Weir N, Suarez C, Folz BJ, Bien S, Towpik E, Leemans CR, Bradley PJ, Kowalski LP, Herranz J, Gavilan J, Olofsson J. European surgeons were the first to perform neck dissection. Laryngoscope. 2007 May;117(5):797-802. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3180325b59.
Robbins KT, Medina JE, Wolfe GT, Levine PA, Sessions RB, Pruet CW. Standardizing neck dissection terminology. Official report of the Academy's Committee for Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991 Jun;117(6):601-5. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1991.01870180037007.
Brown H, Burns S, Kaiser CW. The spinal accessory nerve plexus, the trapezius muscle, and shoulder stabilization after radical neck cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 1988 Nov;208(5):654-61. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198811000-00019.
Krause HR, Bremerich A, Herrmann M. The innervation of the trapezius muscle in connection with radical neck-dissection. An anatomical study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1991 Feb;19(2):87-9. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(05)80613-4.
Patten C, Hillel AD. The 11th nerve syndrome. Accessory nerve palsy or adhesive capsulitis? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993 Feb;119(2):215-20. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1993.01880140105016.
Kalra N, Seitz AL, Boardman ND 3rd, Michener LA. Effect of posture on acromiohumeral distance with arm elevation in subjects with and without rotator cuff disease using ultrasonography. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Oct;40(10):633-40. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3155.
Remmler D, Byers R, Scheetz J, Shell B, White G, Zimmerman S, Goepfert H. A prospective study of shoulder disability resulting from radical and modified neck dissections. Head Neck Surg. 1986 Mar-Apr;8(4):280-6. doi: 10.1002/hed.2890080408.
Umeda M, Shigeta T, Takahashi H, Oguni A, Kataoka T, Minamikawa T, Shibuya Y, Komori T. Shoulder mobility after spinal accessory nerve-sparing modified radical neck dissection in oral cancer patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Jun;109(6):820-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.11.027. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996 Jun;29(6):602-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:63.0.CO;2-L.
Carr SD, Bowyer D, Cox G. Upper limb dysfunction following selective neck dissection: a retrospective questionnaire study. Head Neck. 2009 Jun;31(6):789-92. doi: 10.1002/hed.21018.
Kibler WB, Ludewig PM, McClure PW, Michener LA, Bak K, Sciascia AD. Clinical implications of scapular dyskinesis in shoulder injury: the 2013 consensus statement from the 'Scapular Summit'. Br J Sports Med. 2013 Sep;47(14):877-85. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092425. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
Grassi W. Clinical evaluation versus ultrasonography: who is the winner? J Rheumatol. 2003 May;30(5):908-9. No abstract available.
Dinnes J, Loveman E, McIntyre L, Waugh N. The effectiveness of diagnostic tests for the assessment of shoulder pain due to soft tissue disorders: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(29):iii, 1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta7290.
Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. No abstract available.
Martin RM, Fish DE. Scapular winging: anatomical review, diagnosis, and treatments. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2008 Mar;1(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12178-007-9000-5.
Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1991 Apr;13(2):111-34. doi: 10.1177/016173469101300201.
Righetti R, Garra BS, Mobbs LM, Kraemer-Chant CM, Ophir J, Krouskop TA. The feasibility of using poroelastographic techniques for distinguishing between normal and lymphedematous tissues in vivo. Phys Med Biol. 2007 Nov 7;52(21):6525-41. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/21/013. Epub 2007 Oct 16.
Varghese T, Ophir J. Performance optimization in elastography: multicompression with temporal stretching. Ultrason Imaging. 1996 Jul;18(3):193-214. doi: 10.1177/016173469601800303.
Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ. Ultrasound elastography for musculoskeletal applications. Br J Radiol. 2012 Nov;85(1019):1435-45. doi: 10.1259/bjr/93042867.
Grainger AJ. Highlights of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) annual meeting 2010. Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Jan;40(1):137-9. doi: 10.1007/s00256-010-1030-1. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CMRPG8D1201
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.