Global Assessment of Endoscopic Ultrasound Performance Skills
NCT ID: NCT02455570
Last Updated: 2020-12-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-08-31
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
External, collaborating centers will be invited to participte in the study given that the study inclusion criteria and ethical standard will be ensured.
The investigators of this study have developped a score sheet for the assessment of endosonographists in training to be used in a standard clinical setting. The score sheet is to be used by both the endosonographist in training (performer) for self-assessment and by the supervisor (observer) for assessment of the performer.
First, background data of the performer is recorded (pervious endoscopy experience etc). Then the performer starts the examination under the guidance of the observer. The observer performs continuous evaluation and assessment of the performer according to the skill parameters (N=5) of the Observer score sheet. Each parameter is ranked on a 1-5 scale (1=non-satisfactory performance, 5= excellent performance). Finally the observer is taking over, reevaluates the findings of the performer and finishes the examination.
After the examination the performer fullfills the Performer score sheet. Finally, both the performer and the observer record their preliminary diagosis of the lesion examined.
Adverse events and complications are recorded.
A follow-up of the medical records of the patient is performed 8 weeks after the EUS-examiantion with respect to the final diagnosis of the lesion of interest. The reference standard is set to best available combination of surgery, pathology and imaging reports. The performer´s assessment of the diagnosis is the categorized as CORRECT or FALSE. A correct diagnosis equals 3 Points and a false diagnosis equals 0 Points.
Results in terms of the total and mean score of all perfomers is calculated and collected in a study database. Feasibility of the study assessment sheet is evaluated. Statistical analysis of categorical data is finally applied for evaluating the results with respect to the progress and learning curve of the study participants.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No intervention
No intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The EUS-examination is to be performed by a physician in training as endosonographist OR a physician with a completed training as endosonographist
* The EUS-examination is to be supervised by an experienced endosonographist
* Oral and written consent of the patients examined (age\>18 years)
Exclusion Criteria
* Experimental or therapeutic EUS outside the clinical setting
25 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Per Hedenström
Dr
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Riadh Sadik, Ass prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wani S, Cote GA, Keswani R, Mullady D, Azar R, Murad F, Edmundowicz S, Komanduri S, McHenry L, Al-Haddad MA, Hall M, Hovis CE, Hollander TG, Early D. Learning curves for EUS by using cumulative sum analysis: implications for American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommendations for training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Apr;77(4):558-65. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
Hedenstrom P, Marasco G, Eusebi LH, Lindkvist B, Sadik R. GAPS-EUS: a new and reliable tool for the assessment of basic skills and performance in EUS among endosonography trainees. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun;8(1):e000660. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000660.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Dnr 721-13
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id