Global Assessment of Endoscopic Ultrasound Performance Skills

NCT ID: NCT02455570

Last Updated: 2020-12-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-08-31

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a mini-invasive diagnostic procedure in the work-up of various suspicious malignancies. The learning curve of EUS is regarded long but so far the literature of this topic is minimal. Few studies have been published and there are no standardized or validated methods to perform a systematic assessment of endosonographists in training. This study is an observational study dealing with the matter of assessing endosonographists in training.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sahlgrenska Univeristy Hospital is tertiary university endoscopy center. At our endoscopy unit physicians/endoscopists train EUS under the supervision of an experienced endosonographist. Endosonographists examining patients referred for a routine, clinical EUS at the Sahlgrenska Univeristy hospital are candidates for being study subjects. Patients will not be examined by the study endosonographists if supervision is lacking.

External, collaborating centers will be invited to participte in the study given that the study inclusion criteria and ethical standard will be ensured.

The investigators of this study have developped a score sheet for the assessment of endosonographists in training to be used in a standard clinical setting. The score sheet is to be used by both the endosonographist in training (performer) for self-assessment and by the supervisor (observer) for assessment of the performer.

First, background data of the performer is recorded (pervious endoscopy experience etc). Then the performer starts the examination under the guidance of the observer. The observer performs continuous evaluation and assessment of the performer according to the skill parameters (N=5) of the Observer score sheet. Each parameter is ranked on a 1-5 scale (1=non-satisfactory performance, 5= excellent performance). Finally the observer is taking over, reevaluates the findings of the performer and finishes the examination.

After the examination the performer fullfills the Performer score sheet. Finally, both the performer and the observer record their preliminary diagosis of the lesion examined.

Adverse events and complications are recorded.

A follow-up of the medical records of the patient is performed 8 weeks after the EUS-examiantion with respect to the final diagnosis of the lesion of interest. The reference standard is set to best available combination of surgery, pathology and imaging reports. The performer´s assessment of the diagnosis is the categorized as CORRECT or FALSE. A correct diagnosis equals 3 Points and a false diagnosis equals 0 Points.

Results in terms of the total and mean score of all perfomers is calculated and collected in a study database. Feasibility of the study assessment sheet is evaluated. Statistical analysis of categorical data is finally applied for evaluating the results with respect to the progress and learning curve of the study participants.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

E01.370.350.850.280 I02.399 J01.897.608 N06.850.135.060.075.399 F02.784.629.529.274

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Endoscopic Ultrasound Quality Management Education and training Safety Learning curve

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

No intervention

No intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* EUS-examination with or without sampling performed for clinical reasons at one of the participating centers
* The EUS-examination is to be performed by a physician in training as endosonographist OR a physician with a completed training as endosonographist
* The EUS-examination is to be supervised by an experienced endosonographist
* Oral and written consent of the patients examined (age\>18 years)

Exclusion Criteria

* Physicians in EUS-traning without adequate supervision
* Experimental or therapeutic EUS outside the clinical setting
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Per Hedenström

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Riadh Sadik, Ass prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wani S, Cote GA, Keswani R, Mullady D, Azar R, Murad F, Edmundowicz S, Komanduri S, McHenry L, Al-Haddad MA, Hall M, Hovis CE, Hollander TG, Early D. Learning curves for EUS by using cumulative sum analysis: implications for American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommendations for training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Apr;77(4):558-65. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Dec 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23260317 (View on PubMed)

Hedenstrom P, Marasco G, Eusebi LH, Lindkvist B, Sadik R. GAPS-EUS: a new and reliable tool for the assessment of basic skills and performance in EUS among endosonography trainees. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun;8(1):e000660. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000660.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34108134 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Dnr 721-13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id