Mandibular Sequential Distalization Versus Class III Elastics With Clear Aligners in Class III Patients

NCT ID: NCT06859606

Last Updated: 2025-03-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-12-01

Study Completion Date

2025-01-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Distalizing mandibular molars may be indicated for patients with minor skeletal Class III discrepancies or in Class III subjects with mild crowding. Traditionally, mandibular molar distalization was accomplished using elastics, open coils, and the multiloop edgewise archwire technique. In recent years, several techniques have been developed to reduce the dependence on patient compliance, such as skeletal anchorage. Recently, several reports have been published on mandibular distal movement using miniscrews and some case reports have shown the possibility of obtaining Class III correction with sequential mandibular distalization in non-growing subjects by means of clear aligners. However, a sound clinical judgment should always be made on the basis of a higher level of evidence. Therefore, the purpose of the present prospective study is to provide a detailed analysis of the underlying skeletal and dental changes determined by mandibular distalization therapy with the sequential Invisalign protocol in permanent dentition. This will be accomplished by testing the following null hypothesis: mandibular molar distalization is not achievable with aligners without the application of TADs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Class III malocclusion is considered one of the most challenging maxillofacial disorders in clinical practice characterized by an antero-posterior discrepancy with mandibular protrusion, maxillary retrusion, or a combination of both. In adult patients, managing this condition is further complicated by the absence of residual skeletal growth, limiting therapeutic options to orthodontic interventions and, in some cases, surgical procedures. Diagnosis in Class III adult patients requires distinguishing between skeletal malocclusion and dento-alveolar discrepancy. The combination of orthognathic surgery and orthodontic therapy represents the gold standard for more severe skeletal Class III disharmonies, leading to an improvement of both function and aesthetics. On the other hand, in Class III cases characterized by a prevalent dental component or mild skeletal discrepancy, the malocclusion can be addressed with a dento-alveolar compensation. In these cases, the clinical objectives are to achieve a correct sagittal, canine and molar Class I relationship, as well as ideal values of overjet and overbite. The non-surgical orthopedic approach involves the application of Class III elastics or the distalization of the lower molars, which can improve the sagittal occlusal relationship. As a matter of fact, mandibular distalization allows the increase of lower arch length along with the achievement of the necessary space to correct a Class III relationship. However, bone density and root anatomy make lower molar distalization difficult to achieve. In addition, one of the most frequent adverse effects is represented by the anterior anchorage loss with a worsening of lower incisor proclination and overjet values. Traditional appliances feature the use of open coil springs, inter arch elastics, and lip bumper device combined with fixed appliances. Nowadays, the development of clear aligner technology provides new opportunities even in the management of complex malocclusion cases, including Class III discrepancies. In particular, molar distalization movements and intermaxillary elastics have been proposed as a valid clinical strategy to improve the occlusal relationship without requiring skeletal anchorage devices. During the sagittal mechanics, over-corrected movements should be planned in order to obtain more bodily movements of the lower molars. Moreover, the best accuracy and predictability of distalization movements are supported by the sequential staging and the presence of attachments on the tooth surfaces. Nowadays, scientific evidence on this topic is limited and it is influenced by restrictions in terms of sample size, retrospective design, and lack of long-term observation. Hence, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and efficiency of intermaxillary elastics combined with lower molar distalization by means of clear aligners in the treatment of Class III malocclusion in adult patients. More specifically, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to evaluate the antero-posterior correction induced by Class III elastics combined with lower distalization movements and the application of Class III elastics alone. The possibility of achieving satisfying clinical outcomes without the use of skeletal anchorage was considered to avoid an invasive orthodontic approach

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Class III Malocclusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1 - Lower Distalization Protocol

In Group 1 (Lower Distalization Protocol), all subjects underwent lower molar distalization combined with Class III elastics.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lower molar distalization

Intervention Type OTHER

Lower Distalization Protocol included extraction of the lower third molars before starting treatment and a 50% sequential lower distalization with two teeth being distalized at a time. The distalization started with the movement of lower second molars, followed by the first molars halfway through the process, and so on. Once the canine reached the right position, the "en masse" retraction of the four incisors completed the treatment plan. The protocol comprised the use of Class III intermaxillary elastics to support the distalization movement and to control the proclination of lower incisors

Group 2, Non-Distalization Protocol

In Group 2 (Non-Distalization Protocol) all subjects were treated with dento-alveolar expansion and Class III elastics

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Class III elastics

Intervention Type OTHER

Non-Distalization Protocol featured extraction of the lower third molars before starting treatment, transversal dento-alveolar coordination, strategic interproximal reduction (IPR) in the anterior segment of the lower arch, and the addition of Class III elastics

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lower molar distalization

Lower Distalization Protocol included extraction of the lower third molars before starting treatment and a 50% sequential lower distalization with two teeth being distalized at a time. The distalization started with the movement of lower second molars, followed by the first molars halfway through the process, and so on. Once the canine reached the right position, the "en masse" retraction of the four incisors completed the treatment plan. The protocol comprised the use of Class III intermaxillary elastics to support the distalization movement and to control the proclination of lower incisors

Intervention Type OTHER

Class III elastics

Non-Distalization Protocol featured extraction of the lower third molars before starting treatment, transversal dento-alveolar coordination, strategic interproximal reduction (IPR) in the anterior segment of the lower arch, and the addition of Class III elastics

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult age (≥19 years)
* permanent dentition including second permanent molars
* skeletal Class I or slight Class III (-2° \< ANB \< +2°)
* normal skeletal divergency pattern (SN\^GoGn, 27°-37°)
* Class III canine and molar relationship at baseline (T0), moderate lower arch crowding (≤ +4 mm)
* good compliance with aligners and elastics (≥ 20 hours/day)

Exclusion Criteria

* severe skeletal Class III malocclusion (ANB \< -2°)
* transversal maxillary deficiency
* use of Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs)
* extraction treatments other than third molars
* periodontal disease or temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Francesca Gazzani

Research Assistant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Martina H, Stefano Adriana A, Ernesto B, Alessandra I, Roberto AV, Gabriella G. Lower molar distalization using clear aligners: Is it effective? A systematic review. J Orthod Sci. 2024 Feb 16;13:11. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_174_23. eCollection 2024.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38516119 (View on PubMed)

Rota E, Parrini S, Malekian K, Cugliari G, Mampieri G, Deregibus A, Castroflorio T. Lower molar distalization using clear aligners: bodily movement or uprighting? A preliminary study. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(14), 7123.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Han J, Ning N, Du H, Zhou M, Cai C, Hong Y, et al. Efficacy of clear aligners on mandibular molar distalization: A retrospective study. Digit Med 2021; 7:1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Padmanabhan A, Khan Y, Lambate V, K U, Naveed N, Singh M, Nagi PK. Efficacy of Clear Aligners in Treating Class III Malocclusion With Mandibular Molar Distalization: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2023 Nov 1;15(11):e48134. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48134. eCollection 2023 Nov.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38046776 (View on PubMed)

Pavoni C, Gazzani F, Franchi L, Loberto S, Lione R, Cozza P. Soft tissue facial profile in Class III malocclusion: long-term post-pubertal effects produced by the Face Mask Protocol. Eur J Orthod. 2019 Sep 21;41(5):531-536. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30865768 (View on PubMed)

Gazzani F, Pavoni C, De Razza FC, Lugli L, Cozza P, Lione R. Clear aligner treatment in adult patients with class III malocclusion: lower distalization and class III elastics vs class III elastics alone - a RCT. Eur J Orthod. 2025 Jun 12;47(4):cjaf052. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaf052.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40600239 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

75.23

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.