Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-04-15
2028-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study Of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) With Mobility Training For Gait Recovery After Chronic Ischemic Stroke
NCT07291024
Non-invasive Trigeminal and Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Stroke Subjects With Chronic Upper Extremity Deficits
NCT06288217
Paired Vagus Nerve Stimulation Mechanisms
NCT06716112
Combined taVNS and tDCS in Subacute Stroke Patients
NCT06244914
VNS During Rehabilitation for Improved Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke
NCT02243020
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To determine the predictors of effective brain rewiring in the individual stroke patient, we will use an EEG and/or functional MRI (fMRI) connectivity biomarker independently of the success of the stimulation paradigm (Aim 2). We will test the hypothesis that better motor function will be associated with increased motor network connectivity pattern.
The central objective of this application is to determine whether taVNS significantly improves motor recovery for both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes through increased connectivity as measured by a biomarker of plasticity. We address our objective through the following aims:
Aim 1: To determine the extent to which taVNS with concurrent occupational therapy (OT), causes significant, lasting motor gains in chronic stroke population
Hypothesis A: More chronic stroke patients treated with taVNS+OT will show clinically meaningful improved hand motor function over Sham+OT immediately after treatment as measured by upper extremity Fugl-Meyer (uFM) test response rate. 60 patients at least 6 months after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with persistent arm weakness will be enrolled in a 6-week double masked, sham-controlled, balanced parallel group design phase 2 clinical trial.
Hypothesis B: The sham group will achieve the same degree of motor function improvement in the open label cross-over phase as the original active taVNS group sustained clinical improvement after OT+VNS.
Hypothesis C: The open label home extension taVNS+OT phase will produce additional motor function improvement and will be associated with improved patient and caregiver satisfaction.
Aim 2: To determine the induced connectivity pattern of the brain resulting in the improved motor performance
Hypothesis A: Chronic stroke patients with improved motor performance will demonstrate increased connectivity between motor cortical areas as measured by high-definition EEG and/or fMRI functional connectivity compared to the non-responders immediately after treatment.
Hypothesis B: Network activation with taVNS is dependent on timing compared to movement and stimulation intensity. We will perform fMRI and /or high-definition EEG to evaluate network activity during taVNS at different intensity and phase of the movement.
This study evaluates the feasibility, efficacy and underlying plasticity changes of adjuvant noninvasive VNS to enhance motor recovery following ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sham Stimulation
Same procedure as with the active stimulation using the device's sham settings to elicit the same cutaneous sensation as the other stimulation conditions..
taVNS
Experimental. The current will be increased gradually for both sham and real stimulation at the beginning of the 90-minute stimulation to lessen the itchy/numb skin sensation and to create the same skin sensation for subject blinding.
taVNS
Weak current (up to 0.8-4 mA) will be delivered using pulses according to standard protocol during each motor task for up to 90-minutes through surface electrodes which will be administered using the intensity identified as resulting in well tolerated skin sensation and best motor performance during our initial testing session.
taVNS
Experimental. The current will be increased gradually for both sham and real stimulation at the beginning of the 90-minute stimulation to lessen the itchy/numb skin sensation and to create the same skin sensation for subject blinding.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
taVNS
Experimental. The current will be increased gradually for both sham and real stimulation at the beginning of the 90-minute stimulation to lessen the itchy/numb skin sensation and to create the same skin sensation for subject blinding.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age more than 18, Male or Female, All racial and ethnic groups
* Entry into the study \>6 months post onset
* Patients who can safely undergo taVNS
* Able to follow 2 step commands
* Modified Ashworth Scale Score =\<3 in the involved upper extremity
* Passive range of motion within functional ranges at the shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand
* UFM =\< 60 (scale 0-66)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with bilateral paresis, or weakness or sensory damage due to peripheral causes (e.g. peripheral nerve injury, muscle or orthopedic injury etc.)
* Subjects with contraindication to MRI of the brain
* Patients with severe uncontrolled medical problems (e.g. cardiovascular disease, severe rheumatoid arthritis, active joint deformity of arthritic origin, active cancer or renal disease, any kind of end-stage pulmonary or cardiovascular disease, or a deteriorated condition due to age, epilepsy or others).
* Patients with unstable cardiac arrhythmia, reentry tachycardia.
* Pregnancy
* Patients with pacemakers or stimulators that interfere with the stimulation, or other investigational devices or drugs
* Non-English speaking individuals will only be eligible if they can provide the appropriate translator for all the sessions of the study as no funding is available to pay for such services. However we plan to include them once funding has been secured in the subsequent larger trial.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Timea Hodics
Director, Interventional Neuro-Recovery Program
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Timea Hodics, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Houston Methodist Research Institute
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRO00038365
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.