Cross Bracing Protocol With And Without Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Training in Athletes

NCT ID: NCT06756815

Last Updated: 2025-01-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-01

Study Completion Date

2024-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

ACL Injury is a severe injury for athletes, which frequently results in functional limits and a higher likelihood of re-injury. Although bracing regimens are frequently used in rehabilitation, their ability to restore functional movements after an ACL Injury is still uncertain. Dynamic neuromuscular stabilization (DNS) training, which targets the core and proprioception, has emerged as a viable method for enhancing motor control and decreasing knee instability. The objective of this study is to examine the synergistic impact of cross bracing and DNS training on the functional movements of athletes who have recently experienced an ACL Injury .

A randomized controlled trial will be conducted to study the effects of different interventions on athletes with acute ACL Injury. The participants will be divided into two groups: (A= control group) Cross bracing with conservative treatment, (B= Treatment group) Cross bracing + DNS training with conservative treatment. Both groups will engage in targeted exercises that aim to activate the core, improve proprioception, and enhance movement patterns. The participants' functional movements will be assessed at the beginning of the study and 6 weeks later using established questionnaire such as International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score - assesses knee function and symptoms, Landing error scoring system (LESS), Y Balance (YB), Functional movement screening (FMS) Statistical analysis will be performed to compare the functional performance and neuromuscular parameters between the groups in order to determine the most effective intervention for restoring movement quality after ACL Injury .

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study's emphasis on cross bracing protocol and DNS training is warranted due to the necessity of investigating non-invasive and conservative therapy methods that have the ability to improve functional movements in athletes with ACL Injury . Cross bracing is frequently employed to offer external reinforcement and enhance stability to the knee joint subsequent to an ACL damage, whereas DNS training concentrates on reconditioning the neuromuscular system to enhance movement patterns and motor control. The study seeks to provide significant insights into the most effective rehabilitation regimens for athletes with acute ACL Injury by evaluating the effects of two therapies. The ultimate goal is to enhance their functional results and long-term sports performance.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sports Physical Therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A: Cross bracing + conservative treatment(control group)

Cross brace training week 1-2 1. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds) 2. Quad Sets 3. Straight Leg Raise 4. Ankle Pumps 5. Heel and Toe Raises 6. Glute Bridge Week 3-4

1. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds)
2. Hamstring Curls
3. Step-ups
4. Mini Squats (with support)
5. Leg Press
6. Lateral Leg Raises Week 5-6

1\. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds) 2. Single-leg Balance (with support) 3. Lunges (with proper technique) 4. Squats (bodyweight) 5. Box Jumps 6. Lateral Step-ups

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cross bracing and conservative treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Week Exercise Training Frequency (sets x reps) Week 1-2 1. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds) 2. Quad Sets 3. Straight Leg Raise 4. Ankle Pumps 5. Heel and Toe Raises 6. Glute Bridge 2 sets x 10 reps Week 3-4 1. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds) 2. Hamstring Curls 3. Step-ups 4. Mini Squats (with support) 5. Leg Press 6. Lateral Leg Raises 3 sets x 12 reps Week 5-6 1. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds) 2. Single-leg Balance (with support) 3. Lunges (with proper technique) 4. Squats (bodyweight) 5. Box Jumps 6. Lateral Step-ups 3 sets x 15 reps

Group B: Cross bracing + DNS training + conservative treatment

Week 1-2

1. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds)
2. DNS Core Activation (supine, prone positions)
3. Quad Sets
4. Straight Leg Raise
5. Ankle Pumps
6. Heel and Toe Raises
7. Glute Bridge Week 3-4

1\. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds) 2. DNS Core Stabilization (advanced activation) 3. Hamstring Curls 4. Step-ups 5. Mini Squats 6. Leg Press 7. Lateral Leg Raises 8. Pelvic Tilts Week 5-6

1. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds)
2. DNS Dynamic Stabilization (with resistance)
3. Single-leg Balance (with and without support)
4. Lunges (with added resistance)
5. Squats (bodyweight or weighted)
6. Box Jumps
7. Lateral Step-ups
8. Running Drills (if tolerated)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cross bracing and DNS with conservative treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Week Exercise Training Frequency (sets x reps) Week 1-2

1. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds)
2. DNS Core Activation (supine, prone positions)
3. Quad Sets
4. Straight Leg Raise
5. Ankle Pumps
6. Heel and Toe Raises
7. Glute Bridge 2 sets x 10 reps Week 3-4

1\. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds) 2. DNS Core Stabilization (advanced activation) 3. Hamstring Curls 4. Step-ups 5. Mini Squats 6. Leg Press 7. Lateral Leg Raises 8. Pelvic Tilts 3 sets x 12 reps Week 5-6

1. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds)
2. DNS Dynamic Stabilization (with resistance)
3. Single-leg Balance (with and without support)
4. Lunges (with added resistance)
5. Squats (bodyweight or weighted)
6. Box Jumps
7. Lateral Step-ups
8. Running Drills (if tolerated) 3 sets x 15 reps

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cross bracing and conservative treatment

Week Exercise Training Frequency (sets x reps) Week 1-2 1. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds) 2. Quad Sets 3. Straight Leg Raise 4. Ankle Pumps 5. Heel and Toe Raises 6. Glute Bridge 2 sets x 10 reps Week 3-4 1. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds) 2. Hamstring Curls 3. Step-ups 4. Mini Squats (with support) 5. Leg Press 6. Lateral Leg Raises 3 sets x 12 reps Week 5-6 1. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds) 2. Single-leg Balance (with support) 3. Lunges (with proper technique) 4. Squats (bodyweight) 5. Box Jumps 6. Lateral Step-ups 3 sets x 15 reps

Intervention Type OTHER

Cross bracing and DNS with conservative treatment

Week Exercise Training Frequency (sets x reps) Week 1-2

1. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds)
2. DNS Core Activation (supine, prone positions)
3. Quad Sets
4. Straight Leg Raise
5. Ankle Pumps
6. Heel and Toe Raises
7. Glute Bridge 2 sets x 10 reps Week 3-4

1\. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds) 2. DNS Core Stabilization (advanced activation) 3. Hamstring Curls 4. Step-ups 5. Mini Squats 6. Leg Press 7. Lateral Leg Raises 8. Pelvic Tilts 3 sets x 12 reps Week 5-6

1. Cross Bracing (Isometric Holds)
2. DNS Dynamic Stabilization (with resistance)
3. Single-leg Balance (with and without support)
4. Lunges (with added resistance)
5. Squats (bodyweight or weighted)
6. Box Jumps
7. Lateral Step-ups
8. Running Drills (if tolerated) 3 sets x 15 reps

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

• Landing Error Scoring System • International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score • Functional Movement Screening

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and Female
* Age: 18-30 years.
* Mentally and verbally capable of participating in the study.
* Positive Lachman Test
* Diagnosis of acute ACL Injury with grade 1 and 2 through MRI or arthroscopy.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inflammatory disease, rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathy or active malignancy.
* Neurological disorder or systemic disease.
* Previous surgery on the affected knee.
* Meniscal tear or articular cartilage damage requiring surgical repair
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amir Gul Memon, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

PSRD

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yang XG, Feng JT, He X, Wang F, Hu YC. The effect of knee bracing on the knee function and stability following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Oct;105(6):1107-1114. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.04.015. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31279767 (View on PubMed)

Mahdieh L, Zolaktaf V, Karimi MT. Effects of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization (DNS) training on functional movements. Hum Mov Sci. 2020 Apr;70:102568. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.102568. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31950895 (View on PubMed)

Raines BT, Naclerio E, Sherman SL. Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: What's In and What's Out? Indian J Orthop. 2017 Sep-Oct;51(5):563-575. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_245_17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28966380 (View on PubMed)

Filbay SR, Grindem H. Evidence-based recommendations for the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Feb;33(1):33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31431274 (View on PubMed)

Dunphy E, Button K, Hamilton F, Williams J, Spasic I, Murray E. Feasibility randomised controlled trial comparing TRAK-ACL digital rehabilitation intervention plus treatment as usual versus treatment as usual for patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021 May 5;7(2):e001002. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-001002. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34035951 (View on PubMed)

Greenberg EM, Greenberg ET, Albaugh J, Storey E, Ganley TJ. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation Clinical Practice Patterns: A Survey of the PRiSM Society. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Apr 23;7(4):2325967119839041. doi: 10.1177/2325967119839041. eCollection 2019 Apr.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31041331 (View on PubMed)

Book E, Noyes FR, editors. Read Online The Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction And Basic Science E Book Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Reconstruction and Basic Science2022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Filbay SR, Dowsett M, Chaker Jomaa M, Rooney J, Sabharwal R, Lucas P, Van Den Heever A, Kazaglis J, Merlino J, Moran M, Allwright M, Kuah DEK, Durie R, Roger G, Cross M, Cross T. Healing of acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture on MRI and outcomes following non-surgical management with the Cross Bracing Protocol. Br J Sports Med. 2023 Dec;57(23):1490-1497. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-106931. Epub 2023 Jun 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37316199 (View on PubMed)

Karimijashni M, Sarvestani FK, Yoosefinejad AK. The Effect of Contralateral Knee Neuromuscular Exercises on Static and Dynamic Balance, Knee Function, and Pain in Athletes Who Underwent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Sport Rehabil. 2023 Mar 14;32(5):524-539. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2021-0380. Print 2023 Jul 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36918020 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REC/RCR & AHS/24/0420

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.