The Effect of Virtual Reality on Affective Awareness, Empathy, Clinical Decision Making in Nursing Students
NCT ID: NCT06729918
Last Updated: 2025-07-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-12-11
2025-01-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Video-Based Virtual Reality Education on Self-Confidence and Motivation in Nursing Students
NCT07047157
Virtual Reality in Nursing Students' Communication Skills
NCT07117604
Investigation of the Effect of Virtual Reality Environment on Developing Clinical Skills in Nursing Students
NCT06718881
Virtual Reality and Nursing Students and Dementia
NCT06091462
Investigation of the Effect of Virtual Reality Software on Nurses' Clinical Practice, Problem Solving and Clinical Decision Making Skills and Anxiety in the Care Management of Intensive Care Patients.
NCT05982288
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypothesis 1. Virtual reality-based learning tool affects students' affective awareness Hypothesis 2. Virtual reality-based learning tool affects students' empathy levels.
Hypothesis 3. Virtual reality-based learning tool affects students' self-confidence and anxiety levels in clinical decision making.
The population of the study will consist of 106 student nurses taking the Health Assessment course at Kırıkkale University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing. The sample of the study will consist of students who agree to participate in the study and meet the inclusion criteria.
Randomization in the study; students who meet the sample selection criteria will be randomly divided into 3 groups as virtual reality group, simulated patient group and control (traditional education) group using a computer-based program (www.random.org). Assignment to the virtual reality group, simulated patient group and control (traditional education) groups will be made by an independent researcher to prevent bias and ensure confidentiality.
The data of the study will be collected by using descriptive characteristics form, "Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching", "Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale", "Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing".
Descriptive Characteristics Form The "Descriptive Characteristics Form" was developed by the researchers based on the literature.
"Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching" is a scale developed by Yakar and Duman in 2017. The Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching is a 5-point Likert-type scale (1-Not at all suitable for me; 2-Not suitable for me; 3-Suitable for me; 4-Somewhat suitable for me; 5-Completely suitable for me) consisting of five factors: receiving (7 items), reacting (9 items), valuing (8 items), organizing (7 items), and personification (6 items) and a total of 37 items. The Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient for the overall scale is α=0.896.
"Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale" is a scale developed by Vachon and Lynam in 2015. The Turkish validity and reliability of the Affective and Cognitive Empathy scale was conducted by Yukay Yüksel et al. in 2020. The Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale is a scale developed to measure the affective and cognitive levels of participants. This scale allows the researcher to determine the empathy levels of individuals more comprehensively by examining three different empathy dimensions. The Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient of the scale is α=0.91.
Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing was developed by Krista A. White in 2014. Turkish validity and reliability was conducted by Bektaş et al. in 2017. The scale evaluates nursing students' anxiety and self-confidence in clinical decision making. The six-point Likert-type scale has a total of 27 questions. Scores are obtained separately for self-confidence and anxiety. As the scores obtained from the self-confidence section and its sub-dimensions increase, the student's self-confidence level increases, and as the scores obtained from the anxiety section and its sub-dimensions decrease, the anxiety level decreases. The lowest score that can be obtained from the self-confidence and anxiety sections is 27 and the highest score is 162. The total Cronbach alpha of the self-confidence section of the scale is 0.97 and the total Cronbach alpha of the anxiety section is 0.96.
Research Implementation The theoretical content of the subject will be explained to all students by the researcher using lecture and question and answer techniques. The students will be administered a descriptive characteristics form, Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching", "Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale and Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing (pre-test). Then, students will be randomized into groups according to their academic grade point average.
The virtual reality-based thorax and lung physical examination learning tool was prepared by Aslı Yılmaz and Nurcan Çalışkan. Yılmaz and Çalışkan prepared voice-over content and sound effects to be used in the simulation. After these processes were completed, the algorithm required for the software was created. The researcher planned how the users would move in the simulation, how the menus and controls would work, and how the simulation would respond to the user's actions, and delivered them to the software team. The simulation was developed by the software team using the free and open source "Unity" program to be compatible with the "Oculus" platform.
The simulated patient who will take part in the application was determined. The simulated patient is adult and male. An informative meeting about the process will be held with the simulated patient one week before and on the day of the implementation. Expectations from the simulated patient will be explained at the meeting. Rehearsals will be made regarding the functionality of the application steps and the performance of the simulated patient.
All students in the control group will practice thorax and lung examination on a classmate.
In the health assessment course, three groups will be directed to the laboratories simultaneously. An instructor will be in charge of each group and will ensure coordination. Students in the simulated patient group will work with the simulated patient, students in the virtual reality group will work with virtual reality, and students in the active control group will work on the thorax and lung examination on a classmate who is not in the sample group. While the students are working on the steps of the thorax and lung examination, the instructors will be with them as facilitators. After the practice, the Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching, Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale, and the Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing (post-test) will be administered.
During the fall semester of the academic year, students rotate to different clinics (internal and surgical clinics) 2 days a week. At the end of the 15-week fall semester, students will be administered the Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching, Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale, and the Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing (follow-up test).
Frequency distributions, descriptive statistics, chi-square, one-way analysis of variance (OneWay ANOVA), Levene's test, "multiple comparison test" (Bonferroni, Tamhane's T2) and repeated measures analysis of variance will be used to evaluate the data. 0.05 will be used as the significance level and it will be stated that there is a significant difference in case of p\<0.05 and there is no significant difference in case of p\>0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
virtual reality group
Thoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a virtual reality-based thoracic and lung physical examination learning tool.
Virtual reality
Thoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a virtual reality-based thoracic and lung physical examination learning tool.
simulated patient group
Thoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a simulated patient.
simulated patient
Thoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a simulated patient.
control (traditional education) group
No applicationwas madeto the control group. He/she will practice the thoracic lung physical examination on a classmate who is not in the sample group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Virtual reality
Thoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a virtual reality-based thoracic and lung physical examination learning tool.
simulated patient
Thoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a simulated patient.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Not having eye defects that can affect depth perception such as amblyopia (lazy eye), anisometropia (when the refractions of the two eyes are different from each other) and strabismus (strabismus) (The declaration of the person will be taken as basis)
* Having enrolled in the HEM2005 coded "Health Assessment" course for the first time in the Fall Semester of the 2024-2025 Academic Year.
Exclusion Criteria
* Graduated from high school, associate degree or undergraduate degree in a health-related field,
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Esra DOĞAN YILMAZ, PhD
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Esra DOĞAN YILMAZ, PhD
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emel GÜLNAR, Assoc. Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kırıkkale University
Aslı YILMAZ, MSc
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Gazi University graduate student
Esra DOĞAN YILMAZ, Asst. Prof.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Kırıkkale University
Kamile KIRCA, Asst. Prof.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Kırıkkale University
Şule BIYIK BAYRAM, Assoc. Prof.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Black Sea Technical University
Nurcan ÇALIŞKAN, Prof. Dr.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Gazi University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kirikkale University
Kırıkkale, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
virtual reality-2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.