Assessment of The Accuracy of Complete Crown 3D Superimposition Technique Relative to The Gold Standard Technique for Digital Quantification of Volumetric Soft Tissue Changes in The Esthetic Zone

NCT ID: NCT06673576

Last Updated: 2024-11-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-15

Study Completion Date

2025-05-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to assess the precision of the complete crown technique employed for the superimposition of 3D models, specifically in the quantitative volumetric evaluation of gingival tissues. This technique was initially introduced in an in-vitro study by Dritsas et al. (2023) as a means to achieve an accurate, reproducible, and simple method for quantification of gingival recession.

This study will involve the analysis of digital models in. ply format acquired through intraoral scanning of patients scheduled for esthetic crown lengthening, with predefined inclusion and exclusion

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A digital model T0 (presurgical scan) will be acquired, and the mesh structure will undergo meticulous examination to identify any instances of voids or distorted mesh networks.

Patients will be followed-up for 6 months then undergo the second intraoral scan T6 (6 months follow-up). The resultant mesh structure will be carefully inspected for any defects.

The digital models in. ply format corresponding to T0 (presurgical scan) and T6 (6 months follow-up) will be imported into the BlenderForDental5 software. Notably, the T6 model will be imported twice. Each model will go through a trimming process utilizing the arch cut tool. Subsequently, a base will be created for each model employing the model base tool. A thorough inspection is performed to identify any potential voids in the model base. In cases where voids are detected, the "fill holes" tool will be employed to rectify and fill any voids present within the model base.

Utilizing the superimposition tool, an initial manual alignment of the digital models will be performed, followed by the superimposition procedure. The T0 model will be designated as the reference model, while the first T6 model will be chosen as the moving model. The second T6 model will be designated as the moving.001 model. For the complete crown technique, the crown of the tooth corresponding to the gingival margin under evaluation will be selected using the paint method and circular selection tool. The same selection process will be applied to the moving model. In the case of the gold standard technique, adjacent intact teeth and a portion of the palatal gingiva will be selected. Superimpositions will be executed utilizing the software's iterative closest point algorithm (ICP). A heat map will be generated to verify the accuracy of the superimposition process.

Models will be exported in superimposed orientations to the Geomagic software for the measurement of superimposition accuracy, specifically the root mean square of the tooth corresponding to the gingival margin where volumetric changes are of interest, using the 3D compare tool in Geomagic software.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Volume Assessment Gummy Smile

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients assigned for esthetic crown leghthening

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Complete crown technique for superimposition

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

the complete crown technique, the crown of the tooth corresponding to the gingival margin under evaluation will be selected using the paint method and circular selection tool. The same selection process will be applied to the moving model.

Gold standard technique for superimposition

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

the gold standard technique, adjacent intact teeth and a portion of the palatal gingiva will be selected. Superimpositions will be executed utilizing the software's iterative closest point algorithm (ICP).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Complete crown technique for superimposition

the complete crown technique, the crown of the tooth corresponding to the gingival margin under evaluation will be selected using the paint method and circular selection tool. The same selection process will be applied to the moving model.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Gold standard technique for superimposition

the gold standard technique, adjacent intact teeth and a portion of the palatal gingiva will be selected. Superimpositions will be executed utilizing the software's iterative closest point algorithm (ICP).

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients requiring esthetic crown lengthening.
2. Full-mouth plaque and bleeding score not exceeding 20%.
3. Presence of at least 2.5 mm keratinized tissue width (Pontoriero \& Carnevale, 2001).
4. Patients showing motivation to comply with post-operative care instructions and follow-up appointments.

Exclusion Criteria

* 1\. Systemic health conditions that contraindicate or affect healing of periodontal surgery.

2\. Patients requiring prosthetic crowns or restorations in the esthetic zone. 3. Gummy smile with normal tooth proportions. 4. Patients treated with medications known to affect the gingiva (Phenytoin, Cyclosporine and Nifedipine).

5\. Smokers. 6. Pregnant and nursing females.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

British University In Egypt

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Mohamed Hassan

Assistant Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cairo University

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ahmed Mohamed Hassan, Master Degree of Periodontolog

Role: CONTACT

+201060683334

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Samah Bahaa, Lecturer

Role: primary

+20 100 680 6808

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

131024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.